Darwinism is no longer just a scientific theory but the basis of a worldview

[basquebromance]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

 

[night_son]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

In order to understand the true motive of Darwinism, one must fully comprehend the Hegelian Dialectic. There's a bridge to be built there, between Darwin and Marx. I would applaud the courage of the individual who not only builds but also dares cross such a bridge, for much of the world and all of his peers will deem him as perhaps the most onerous and annoying heretic in human history. Funny that, as whoever does do it will also be the most honest "heretic" who ever lived.

 

[ding]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

In order to understand the true motive of Darwinism, one must fully comprehend the Hegelian Dialectic. There's a bridge to be built there, between Darwin and Marx. I would applaud the courage of the individual who not only builds but also dares cross such a bridge, for much of the world and all of his peers will deem him as perhaps the most onerous and annoying heretic in human history. Funny that, as whoever does do it will also be the most honest "heretic" who ever lived.

I'm not certain but I think this atheist may be him.

What scares the new atheists | John Gray

 

[progressive hunter]

evolution and all it teachs is more of a religion than Hanuka ,,,

the fossil record is pure speculation based on poor assumptions,,,

 

[alang1216]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

Much of Darwin's theories have been discredited, especially in his later works. However, his masterpiece, natural selection, stands firm and always will. It is accepted as fact by the vast majority of scientists everywhere. Period.

 

[progressive hunter]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

Much of Darwin's theories have been discredited, especially in his later works. However, his masterpiece, natural selection, stands firm and always will. It is accepted as fact by the vast majority of scientists everywhere. Period.

it stands firm in quicksand,,,

 

[alang1216]

evolution and all it teachs is more of a religion than Hanuka ,,,

the fossil record is pure speculation based on poor assumptions,,,

The fossil record is exactly that, a record of what lived on the planet. The scientific method has removed speculations and assumptions about what fossils mean over the centuries.

 

[alang1216]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

Much of Darwin's theories have been discredited, especially in his later works. However, his masterpiece, natural selection, stands firm and always will. It is accepted as fact by the vast majority of scientists everywhere. Period.

it stands firm in quicksand,,,

Your ignorance is again showing. Just because you refuse to learn the facts don't mean the facts don't exist.

 

[progressive hunter]

evolution and all it teachs is more of a religion than Hanuka ,,,

the fossil record is pure speculation based on poor assumptions,,,

The fossil record is exactly that, a record of what lived on the planet. The scientific method has removed speculations and assumptions about what fossils mean over the centuries.

so when did they prove that???

I never heard a time machine was invented,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

Much of Darwin's theories have been discredited, especially in his later works. However, his masterpiece, natural selection, stands firm and always will. It is accepted as fact by the vast majority of scientists everywhere. Period.

it stands firm in quicksand,,,

Your ignorance is again showing. Just because you refuse to learn the facts don't mean the facts don't exist.

what facts???

 

[Moonglow]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

Darwinism-the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin.

Natural selection-the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution.

Why would there need to be ancient fossils to prove what is obvious to humans in the current time on the planet?

 

[Hollie]

evolution and all it teachs is more of a religion than Hanuka ,,,

the fossil record is pure speculation based on poor assumptions,,,

Such are the rantings of the hyper-religious.

 

[progressive hunter]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

Darwinism-the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin.

Natural selection-the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution.

Why would there need to be ancient fossils to prove what is obvious to humans in the current time on the planet?

there is no proof that any animal evolved into another animal other than its own kind,,,

 

[Moonglow]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

Darwinism-the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin.

Natural selection-the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution.

Why would there need to be ancient fossils to prove what is obvious to humans in the current time on the planet?

there is no proof that any animal evolved into another animal other than its own kind,,,

I never said they did.

 

[Hollie]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

You should know that phrases such as “Darwinism” are clear indicators that your comments are stolen from one of the many fundamentalist Christian ministries; AIG, Creation.com for example.

Which one did you steal from?

 

[fncceo]

If life on this planet did not evolve through the process of natural selection.

How, precisely, did life on this planet come into being and what fossil evidence can you present to support your supposition?

 

[alang1216]

The fossil record is exactly that, a record of what lived on the planet. The scientific method has removed speculations and assumptions about what fossils mean over the centuries.

so when did they prove that???

I never heard a time machine was invented,,,

If you were to dig up a fossil of a clam, is there any doubt in your mind that a clam lived and died before becoming a fossil? Fossils are frozen snapshots of past time.

 

[Hollie]

The ever-expanding fossil archives don’t look good for Darwin, who made clear and concrete predictions that have (so far) been falsified—according to many reputable paleontologists, anyway. When does the clock run out on those predictions? Never

Darwinism-the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin.

Natural selection-the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution.

Why would there need to be ancient fossils to prove what is obvious to humans in the current time on the planet?

there is no proof that any animal evolved into another animal other than its own kind,,,

There are lots of transitional fossils. So, as usual, you are wrong.

You should know that the phrase “kinds” is a slogan that is littered across all of the fundamentalist Christian ministries and used by the charlatans there to denigrate science.

 

[alang1216]

what facts???

Exactly my point.

 

[progressive hunter]

The fossil record is exactly that, a record of what lived on the planet. The scientific method has removed speculations and assumptions about what fossils mean over the centuries.

so when did they prove that???

I never heard a time machine was invented,,,

If you were to dig up a fossil of a clam, is there any doubt in your mind that a clam lived and died before becoming a fossil? Fossils are frozen snapshots of past time.

I never said different,,,but that clam never evolved into anything but a clam which is what evo claims did happen