Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 145,554
- 32,642
- 2,180
Ehhh WRONG. Like I said discrimination against men its obviously the last discrimination allowed.
Lucky for you that you're no man.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ehhh WRONG. Like I said discrimination against men its obviously the last discrimination allowed.
Discrimination against men...not a surprise...it will be the last thing if it ever happens to be given equal rights...we have no right to stop a woman from murdering our babies and now we have no rights to see our children born. Feminazis win again...time is coming soon I hope though...
Is English you're first language?
Discrimination against men...not a surprise...it will be the last thing if it ever happens to be given equal rights...we have no right to stop a woman from murdering our babies and now we have no rights to see our children born. Feminazis win again...time is coming soon I hope though...
Is English you're first language?
....men *****...men ***** about men's right blah blah blah
Discrimination against men...not a surprise...it will be the last thing if it ever happens to be given equal rights...we have no right to stop a woman from murdering our babies and now we have no rights to see our children born. Feminazis win again...time is coming soon I hope though...
Is English you're first language?
Is it yours? *Note the lack of an apostrophe*
....once you give up your sperm you no more rights to the said sperm or products of that sperm
sure its a good line of reasoning....

LOL think of how that kid was made genius...been there done thatDoubtful kid doubtful.
Not trolling, I created the damn kid I will see it born if I choose to.
Great I don't care who its about it sets a stupid precedent and now ANY woman can bar her husband or fiance or bf who is the father of the child from the delivery room. If my wife tried that and succeeded she would be signing divorce papers in the hospital. I guarantee you that. We as a couple decided to have kids that gives us BOTH full rights to the child at all times including delivery. You feminist cocksuckers can rot in hell. End of the story.
Ex-fiance. An ex-fiance wanted the right to watch is ex while in labor.
If your wife didn't want you there, then fine, serve her with divorce papers. If she doesn't want you there, then maybe it is time for divorce. None of that gives you the right to gawk at a naked woman who doesn't want you gawking at her.
End of story.
You have no right to look at a naked woman against her will. But enjoy forcing yourself into the room where she is lying naked pleading with the nurses to remove you. And enjoy your time in prison.
She has no constitutional right to bar me from seeing it born either. Just because some ********** in a robe says I can't be in there don't mean jack shit to me or any other sane person.Doubtful kid doubtful.
Not trolling, I created the damn kid I will see it born if I choose to.
Great I don't care who its about it sets a stupid precedent and now ANY woman can bar her husband or fiance or bf who is the father of the child from the delivery room. If my wife tried that and succeeded she would be signing divorce papers in the hospital. I guarantee you that. We as a couple decided to have kids that gives us BOTH full rights to the child at all times including delivery. You feminist cocksuckers can rot in hell. End of the story.
You have no Constitutional right to see a child you claim, but cannot prove, is yours born.
Is it yours? *Note the lack of an apostrophe*
Aren't you special?
Bitchy much?![]()
At last, a Judge makes a common sense decision. It should be headlines.
New Jersey Judge: Women Can Block Dads From Delivery Room « CBS Philly
“It’s well established under federal and state law that there is a privacy right when a woman’s in labor.”
Rutgers professor and family law expert Sally Goldfarb says a Passaic County judge made the right call last November in his decision, which was published this week, when he sided with pregnant woman that her ex-fiancee had no legal right to be in the delivery room.
“What this man was seeking to do was really interfere with the woman’s ability to exercise her own choices about giving birth in privacy and that to me falls outside of the rights that a father is legitimately entitled to.”
The law isn't for loving couples, it's for couples whose last communication was six months ago when he called her a ******* **** and she spit in his face.
The law isn't for loving couples, it's for couples whose last communication was six months ago when he called her a ******* **** and she spit in his face.
And that is fair enough, as long as it isn't used for women to simply deny their partner the right to watch the birth of their child.
Technically we don't see it either we're generally preoccupied.But we have to be there
See, if it were we men who gave birth the C-section rate would be 100% and a mighty array of drugs would as policy be employed to ensure total lack of consciousness or memory of the event. In fact, I'm guessing the entire 3rd trimester would long since have been transferred to a birthing pod that science fiction cannot even imagine.