The rationale behind Democrat lawfare

[berg80]

~~~~~~>
Tsk, Tsk, Tsk! using vulgar language does not accomplish any of your goals.
However, it does prove your lack of education, intelligence and ignorance...

Neither does providing factual info in refute of everything you've been duped in to believing. BTW, you just accused me of having a lack of ignorance. Finally, we agree on something.

Next time, instead of using an over used, specious talking point in the thread title ask yourself how the US legal system was supposed to deal with all of the orange piece of shit's many crimes? Was the DoJ under Garland supposed to ignore that Dotard refused to comply with a subpoena for the return of top secret, classified docs? Should he have turned a blind eye to the fake elector scheme that was part of the plot to steal the election?