Zone1 Cut it off

As noted in scripture, it is much more than symbolic. Who else would we remember?

Yes, it is a hard teaching...who/which faith can believe it? Catholic. Orthodox. Coptic.
In Mt 26:29 after Jesus had said, "this is my blood" and prayed, he still referred to the contents as, "fruit of the vine". If transubstantiation of the juice into blood had occurred, as both Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches say it was at this time, then Jesus would never have referred to it as "fruit of the vine' but rather "blood". This proves that when Jesus said "take eat & drink" he LITERALLY gave them bread and juice.
 
In Mt 26:29 after Jesus had said, "this is my blood" and prayed, he still referred to the contents as, "fruit of the vine". If transubstantiation of the juice into blood had occurred, as both Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches say it was at this time, then Jesus would never have referred to it as "fruit of the vine' but rather "blood". This proves that when Jesus said "take eat & drink" he LITERALLY gave them bread and juice.
Jesus couldn't have been more clear. He was given a chance to soften his statement and chose to not make it symbolic. He used words like gnaw and chomp.
 
In Mt 26:29 after Jesus had said, "this is my blood" and prayed, he still referred to the contents as, "fruit of the vine". If transubstantiation of the juice into blood had occurred, as both Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches say it was at this time, then Jesus would never have referred to it as "fruit of the vine' but rather "blood". This proves that when Jesus said "take eat & drink" he LITERALLY gave them bread and juice.
Do you believe in the Resurrection? Is that a miracle that has your approval, therefore you can believe? Those who believe in the miracle of the Resurrection have the faith to believe that bread and wine can retain the appearances of bread and wine while also becoming the body, the blood, the divinity of Christ. To not believe this can be compared to saying, After Jesus rose from the dead, I believe he could have walked through locked doors and could have disappeared after the breaking of the bread on the road to Emmaus--or he could have eaten and touched--but it has to be one or the other.
 
Not necessarily money. There are plenty of other forms of payment out there. The biggest part of the of always was that the more I did, not only didn’t I get the good stuff in life, but I continued to accrue the bad stuff in life at an accelerated pace.
What was the stuff you wanted from life?
 
What was the stuff you wanted from life?
A little bit of decency. Maybe a bit of fairness. Not getting slapped in the face and kicked in the balls by life every time I turned around?

I’m 50 years and 3 months old and I’ve spent the last 51 years (from the moment of my conception) getting the short straw every single time straws get drawn. Eventually being the laughingstock, the butt if the jokes, the loser in every single situation gets a little old. Especially when it’s for things you have no control over.
 
A little bit of decency. Maybe a bit of fairness. Not getting slapped in the face and kicked in the balls by life every time I turned around?

I’m 50 years and 3 months old and I’ve spent the last 51 years (from the moment of my conception) getting the short straw every single time straws get drawn. Eventually being the laughingstock, the butt if the jokes, the loser in every single situation gets a little old. Especially when it’s for things you have no control over.
Exactly. High on the list of what we desire is respect. Every person has bodily imperfections, unsightliness--and some of us have more than our fair share of them--or so it seems. I often work with special needs kids, and often the first thing that is seen is the imperfection(s). How bad these imperfections are, they are not the person. The loveliness inside cannot be hidden, but it is often overlooked. People who ever slapped you, have the worse deformity. They are blind, they cannot see, and that is often disgusting and always pitiful.

This being said, the physical deformity/unsightliness is there and always will be. It is vital to give people the time to give this surface a good look, because the best of people out there who get to know you, quickly get past the surface and see only the inner person/personality. Because they make us feel we are worth knowing, we absolutely know for a fact they are worth knowing. When a beautiful outward appearance and an ugly outward appearance turn into people who are best friends, everyone knows there is something beyond and deeper in each than what is seen on the surface.

Sometimes it pays to be respectful to those who are beautiful because some have that same lonely feeling that no one really sees them, the person inside. Think about having the only thing that is ever respected about you by many is your beauty. We are a broken people.
 
I'm amputating women. As a Catholic, God considers me still married to my ex-wife. If I have sex with someone else, that's adultery in God's eyes.
 
Do you believe in the Resurrection? Is that a miracle that has your approval, therefore you can believe? Those who believe in the miracle of the Resurrection have the faith to believe that bread and wine can retain the appearances of bread and wine while also becoming the body, the blood, the divinity of Christ. To not believe this can be compared to saying, After Jesus rose from the dead, I believe he could have walked through locked doors and could have disappeared after the breaking of the bread on the road to Emmaus--or he could have eaten and touched--but it has to be one or the other.
you take it out of context to fir your church.
 
you take it out of context to fir your church.
She has a valid point. Apparently it's not too much of a miracle for you to believe God was born into this world, performed 40 or so miracles of which included bringing others back from death and then resurrected himself from death but it's too much for you to believe that he can turn bread and wine into his body and blood even though that's exactly what he said he was doing.
 
It's amazing to think that God can will the universe into existence such that life and intelligence would arise and doubt anything he could do.
 
Now I understand .

It is Goddy Boy telling the Tranny bio- males to remove their appendages in service to him .

Telling them what naughty mutants they are .
But that they are STILL LOVED IF THEY WILL JUST DO AS THEY ARE FUCKING WELL TOLD .
 
jesus said fruit of the vine, which is wine not blood.
ā€œUnless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in youā€ John 6:53
 
jesus said fruit of the vine, which is wine not blood.
"I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world.ā€ John 6:51
 
jesus said fruit of the vine, which is wine not blood.
The Jews quarreled among themselves, saying, ā€œHow can this man give us [his] flesh to eat?ā€ Jesus said to them, ā€œAmen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him." John 6:52-56
 
jesus said fruit of the vine, which is wine not blood.
Then many of his disciples who were listening said, ā€œThis saying is hard; who can accept it?ā€ Since Jesus knew that his disciples were murmuring about this, he said to them, ā€œDoes this shock you? What if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? It is the spirit that gives life, while the flesh is of no avail. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life. John 6:60-63
 

What did Jesus mean when He said we must eat His flesh and drink His blood?​


Jesus eat flesh drink blood

Answer

In John 6:53–57, Jesus says, ā€œVery truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.ā€ Upon hearing these words, many of Jesus’ followers said, ā€œThis is a hard teachingā€ (verse 60), and many of them actually stopped following Him that day (verse 66).

Jesus’ graphic imagery about eating His flesh and drinking His blood is indeed puzzling at first. Context will help us understand what He is saying. As we consider everything that Jesus said and did in John 6, the meaning of His words becomes clearer.

Earlier in the chapter, Jesus fed the 5,000 (John 6:1–13). The next day, the same multitudes continued to follow Him, seeking another meal. Jesus pointed out their short-sightedness: they were only seeking physical bread, but there was something more important: ā€œFood that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give youā€ (verse 27). At this point, Jesus attempts to turn their perspective away from physical sustenance to their true need, which was spiritual.

This contrast between physical food and spiritual food sets the stage for Jesus’ statement that we must eat His flesh and drink His blood. Jesus explains that it is not physical bread that the world needs, but spiritual bread. Jesus three times identifies Himself as that spiritual bread (John 6:35, 48, 51). And twice He emphasizes faith (a spiritual action) as the key to salvation: ā€œMy Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal lifeā€ (verse 40); and ā€œVery truly I tell you, the one who believes has eternal lifeā€ (verse 47).

Jesus then compares and contrasts Himself to the manna that Israel had eaten in the time of Moses: ā€œYour ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, yet they died. But here is the bread that comes down from heaven, which anyone may eat and not dieā€ (John 6:49–50). Like manna, Jesus came down from heaven; and, like manna, Jesus gives life. Unlike manna, the life Jesus gives lasts for eternity (verse 58). In this way, Jesus is greater than Moses (see Hebrews 3:3).

Having established His metaphor (and the fact that He is speaking of faith in Him), Jesus presses the symbolism even further: ā€œI am the living bread that came down from heaven. Anyone who eats this bread will live forever; and this bread, which I will offer so the world may live, is my flesh. . . . I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you cannot have eternal life within you. But anyone who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life. . . . My flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Anyone who eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him. . . . Anyone who feeds on me will live because of meā€ (John 6:51–56, NLT).

To prevent being misconstrued, Jesus specifies that He has been speaking metaphorically: ā€œThe Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you—they are full of the Spirit and lifeā€ (John 6:63). Those who misunderstood Jesus and were offended by His talk about eating His flesh and drinking His blood were stuck in a physical mindset, ignoring the things of the Spirit. They were concerned with getting another physical meal, so Jesus uses the realm of the physical to teach a vital spiritual truth. Those who couldn’t make the jump from the physical to the spiritual turned their backs on Jesus and walked away (verse 66).

At the Last Supper, Jesus gives a similar message and one that complements His words in John 6—when the disciples gather to break bread and drink the cup, they ā€œproclaim the Lord’s death until he comesā€ (1 Corinthians 11:26). In fact, Jesus said that the bread broken at the table is His body, and the cup they drink is the new covenant in His blood, shed for the forgiveness of sins (Matthew 26:26–28). Their act of eating and drinking was to be a symbol of their faith in Christ. Just as physical food gives earthly life, Christ’s sacrifice on the cross gives heavenly life.

Some people believe that the bread and wine of communion are somehow transformed into Jesus’ actual flesh and blood, or that Jesus somehow imbues these substances with His real presence. These ideas, called transubstantiation (professed by the Catholic and Orthodox churches) and consubstantiation (held by some Lutherans), ignore Jesus’ statement that ā€œthe flesh counts for nothingā€ (John 6:63). The majority of Protestants understand that Jesus was speaking metaphorically about His flesh and blood and hold that the bread and wine are symbolic of the spiritual bond created with Christ through faith.

In the wilderness testing, the devil tempts Jesus with bread, and Jesus answers, ā€œIt is written: ā€˜Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of Godā€™ā€ (Matthew 4:4, quoting Deuteronomy 8:3). The implication is that the bread is God’s Word and that is what sustains us. Jesus is called the Word of God who came to earth and was made flesh (John 1:14). The Word of God is also the Bread of Life (John 6:48).

The book of Hebrews references the way that God uses the physical things of this earth as a way to help us understand and apply spiritual truth. Hebrews 8:5 says that some tangible things are ā€œa copy and shadow of what is in heaven,ā€ and that chapter explains how the Old Covenant, so concerned with physical rites and ceremonies, was replaced by the New Covenant in which God’s laws are written on our hearts (verse 10; cf. Jeremiah 31:33).

Hebrews 9:1–2 says, ā€œThe first covenant had regulations for worship and also an earthly sanctuary. A tabernacle was set up. In its first room were the lampstand and the table with its consecrated bread; this was called the Holy Place.ā€ According to Hebrews 8:5, the consecrated bread, or the ā€œbread of the Presence,ā€ was a physical representation of a spiritual concept, namely, the actual presence of God being continually with us today. The physical tent of meeting has been replaced by a spiritual temple of God (1 Corinthians 3:16), and the physical bread of the Presence has become the spiritual bread that abides within us through the Holy Spirit.

When Jesus said we must ā€œeat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his bloodā€ (John 6:53), He spoke, as He often did, in parabolic terms. We must receive Him by faith (John 1:12). ā€œBlessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filledā€ (Matthew 5:6). We understand that we need physical food and drink; Jesus wants us to understand that we also need spiritual food and drink—and that is what His sacrifice provides.
 
Back
Top Bottom