Crowley's False Fact Check Saves President, Derails Debate

[EriktheRed]

So do any of you smart assed libtards wanna tell us why the obama said the day after the attack "it was terrorists" and then five days later the ambassador to the UN Rice said "No it wasn't it was a spontaneous mob" how come that dumb ass woman still has a job? We'd really like to know.

Romney whiffed and lost the debate last night. Suck on it, little wingnut.

I'll take winning on the issues to winning the debate, which is what CNN found.

Oh, but you haven't really "won" on this, either. This issue isn't the Obama-killer you all would like it to be. And if Rmoney really wants to push the issue next week, then maybe he can also talk about what HE said after this happened.

 

[freedombecki]

I would bet any amount of money that Candy Crowley is tickled pink at how the debate went. How could she not? She's an Obama supporter and she got a chance to help him against Mitt Romney. You honestly think that is going diminish Crowley's "stature" in the liberal Main Stream Media? I'm sorry but she'll come out of this as a hero to the Left. The one question that Barack Obama had to fear more than any other in this debate was asked and when Obama tried to bullshit his way through it the moderator came to his rescue by declaring that Obama had indeed called it a terrorist attack in his Rose Garden speech. Please note that the question Obama was asked was who made the decision not to give additional security to the embassy in Bengazi...a question he totally sidestepped. It's a question that a GOOD moderator would have insisted he answer but Crowley was too busy riding to the President's rescue to do her real job.

Candy Crowley went into the debate dressed for a ball but loaded for bear. She manipulated the conversation to allow Obama to enunciate his whiney misrepresentation of Romney as a "liar" spew at a time when he knew Romney would not be allowed by her to call him on it.

Candy Crowley jumped all over Romney on 3 different occasions when he tried to defend himself and cut him off even going so far as lording it over him a "civilian" had a question to ask him, so he couldn't talk about his being called a liar in the most calumnious way.

The set up was hoping to place Romney in a meltdown, which just didn't happen, much to Candy Crowley's dismay.

She set up the program so Obama could masquerade his liar spiel as the truth, and disallow Romney to respond immediately and appropriately.

But she did allow Obama to talk 4 minutes more than Romney, since all else failed.

That's a sales technique employed by the advertising industry--put out more advertising than your competitor can buy, and you will sell more product.

But unfortunately, Democrats have made the American public leary of their ill-doing, and they are going to pay the price at the polls on November 6 for their malicious set-ups these debates have become.

They don't want the American public to understand the width and depth of the lengths they have gone to to wrest our freedoms--First through last--in order to set up the DNC Make-a-Wish Government it has always set its sights on, with Republicans paying all their savings, inheritances, and the majority of their earnings so Democrats can snore the morning hours away on welfare after spliffing all night.

FAIL!

 

[Cheddarmelon]

I would bet any amount of money that Candy Crowley is tickled pink at how the debate went. How could she not? She's an Obama supporter and she got a chance to help him against Mitt Romney. You honestly think that is going diminish Crowley's "stature" in the liberal Main Stream Media? I'm sorry but she'll come out of this as a hero to the Left. The one question that Barack Obama had to fear more than any other in this debate was asked and when Obama tried to bullshit his way through it the moderator came to his rescue by declaring that Obama had indeed called it a terrorist attack in his Rose Garden speech. Please note that the question Obama was asked was who made the decision not to give additional security to the embassy in Bengazi...a question he totally sidestepped. It's a question that a GOOD moderator would have insisted he answer but Crowley was too busy riding to the President's rescue to do her real job.

Candy Crowley went into the debate dressed for a ball but loaded for bear. She manipulated the conversation to allow Obama to enunciate his whiney misrepresentation of Romney as a "liar" spew at a time when he knew Romney would not be allowed by her to call him on it.

Candy Crowley jumped all over Romney on 3 different occasions when he tried to defend himself and cut him off lording it over him a "civilian" had a question to ask him, so he couldn't talk about it.

The set up was hoping to place Romney in a meltdown, which just didn't happen, much to Candy Crowley's dismay.

She set up the program so Obama could masquerade his liar spiel as the truth, and disallow Romney to respond immediately and appropriately.

But she did allow Obama to talk 4 minutes more than Romney, since all else failed.

That's a sales technique employed by the advertising industry--put out more advertising than your competitor can buy, and you will sell more product.

But unfortunately, Democrats have made the American public leary of their ill-doing, and they are going to pay the price at the polls on November 6 for their malicious set-ups these debates have become.

They don't want the American public to understand the width and depth of the lengths they have gone to to wrest our freedoms--First through last--in order to set up the DNC Make-a-Wish Government it has always set its sights on, with Republicans paying all their savings, inheritances, and the majority of their earnings so Democrats can snore the morning hours away on welfare after spliffing all night.

FAIL!

 

[ScienceRocks]

Time line of lies!

Obama's Benghazi Lies - Home

Destroys Obama's case. It wasn't about a ******* terrorist attack, BUT the protest over our freedom of speech.

Susan Rice said on the 16th that this wasn't a pre-planned attack. LIES

On the 18th Obama went on the letterman show and blamed our first amendment for the attack. LIES!!!

If the terrorized was supposed to mean a terrorist attack. Well, Obama sure inserted his foot in his ass.

Clinton on the 21st was the first to say it was a Terrorist attack. SPIN!

Obama on the view on the 25th said it was about the ******* video! Spin some more!!!

 

[rdean]

Crowley, quite incorrectly, took Obama's side and the crowd exploded.

Nice try!!!

There were no sides, there are just the facts.

You fuckers don't get that.

Republicans have never met a fact they didn't want to "rewrite".

Texas schools board rewrites US history with lessons promoting God and guns

 

[JoeB131]

So "acts of terror" and "terrorist attacks" are two different things?

Sheesh.

It's against Sharia law to call cold blooded murderers on Jihad for Allah Terrorists. Obama was showing submission to Shariah by saying what he said rather than to call extremist Muslims the terrorists that they are for their high crimes against humanity.

Any way you roll the dice, Obama's politically correct number is up, and he's going down.

And you can always tell the crazies when they claim Obama is really a closet Muslim...

 

[ScienceRocks]

Read all about it...Obama spins and lies!!!!


Time line of lies!

Obama's Benghazi Lies - Home

Destroys Obama's case. It wasn't about a ******* terrorist attack, BUT the protest over our freedom of speech.

On the 13th he was talking about the protest when he said terrorized.

Susan Rice said on the 16th that this wasn't a pre-planned attack. LIES

On the 18th Obama went on the letterman show and blamed our first amendment for the attack. LIES!!!

If the terrorized was supposed to mean a terrorist attack. Well, Obama sure inserted his foot in his ass.

Clinton on the 21st was the first to say it was a Terrorist attack. SPIN!

Obama on the view on the 25th said it was about the ******* video! Spin some more!!!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD4a9GHBF_U&feature=related]Carney maintains Libya attack was not preplanned - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPzjayOh-PU&feature=relmfu]Who is responsible for the attack in Benghazi? - YouTube[/ame]

 

[JoeB131]

So do any of you smart assed libtards wanna tell us why the obama said the day after the attack "it was terrorists" and then five days later the ambassador to the UN Rice said "No it wasn't it was a spontaneous mob" how come that dumb ass woman still has a job? We'd really like to know.

Distinction without a difference...

 

[JoeB131]

I would bet any amount of money that Candy Crowley is tickled pink at how the debate went. How could she not? She's an Obama supporter and she got a chance to help him against Mitt Romney. You honestly think that is going diminish Crowley's "stature" in the liberal Main Stream Media? I'm sorry but she'll come out of this as a hero to the Left. The one question that Barack Obama had to fear more than any other in this debate was asked and when Obama tried to bullshit his way through it the moderator came to his rescue by declaring that Obama had indeed called it a terrorist attack in his Rose Garden speech. Please note that the question Obama was asked was who made the decision not to give additional security to the embassy in Bengazi...a question he totally sidestepped. It's a question that a GOOD moderator would have insisted he answer but Crowley was too busy riding to the President's rescue to do her real job.

Candy Crowley went into the debate dressed for a ball but loaded for bear. She manipulated the conversation to allow Obama to enunciate his whiney misrepresentation of Romney as a "liar" spew at a time when he knew Romney would not be allowed by her to call him on it.

Candy Crowley jumped all over Romney on 3 different occasions when he tried to defend himself and cut him off lording it over him a "civilian" had a question to ask him, so he couldn't talk about it.

The set up was hoping to place Romney in a meltdown, which just didn't happen, much to Candy Crowley's dismay.

She set up the program so Obama could masquerade his liar spiel as the truth, and disallow Romney to respond immediately and appropriately.

But she did allow Obama to talk 4 minutes more than Romney, since all else failed.

That's a sales technique employed by the advertising industry--put out more advertising than your competitor can buy, and you will sell more product.

But unfortunately, Democrats have made the American public leary of their ill-doing, and they are going to pay the price at the polls on November 6 for their malicious set-ups these debates have become.

They don't want the American public to understand the width and depth of the lengths they have gone to to wrest our freedoms--First through last--in order to set up the DNC Make-a-Wish Government it has always set its sights on, with Republicans paying all their savings, inheritances, and the majority of their earnings so Democrats can snore the morning hours away on welfare after spliffing all night.

FAIL!

Good one, dude.

Hey, I've noticed a flaw where you can't Rep a post that's really long.

 

[Cheddarmelon]

Candy Crowley went into the debate dressed for a ball but loaded for bear. She manipulated the conversation to allow Obama to enunciate his whiney misrepresentation of Romney as a "liar" spew at a time when he knew Romney would not be allowed by her to call him on it.

Candy Crowley jumped all over Romney on 3 different occasions when he tried to defend himself and cut him off lording it over him a "civilian" had a question to ask him, so he couldn't talk about it.

The set up was hoping to place Romney in a meltdown, which just didn't happen, much to Candy Crowley's dismay.

She set up the program so Obama could masquerade his liar spiel as the truth, and disallow Romney to respond immediately and appropriately.

But she did allow Obama to talk 4 minutes more than Romney, since all else failed.

That's a sales technique employed by the advertising industry--put out more advertising than your competitor can buy, and you will sell more product.

But unfortunately, Democrats have made the American public leary of their ill-doing, and they are going to pay the price at the polls on November 6 for their malicious set-ups these debates have become.

They don't want the American public to understand the width and depth of the lengths they have gone to to wrest our freedoms--First through last--in order to set up the DNC Make-a-Wish Government it has always set its sights on, with Republicans paying all their savings, inheritances, and the majority of their earnings so Democrats can snore the morning hours away on welfare after spliffing all night.

FAIL!

Good one, dude.

Hey, I've noticed a flaw where you can't Rep a post that's really long.

rep doesn't matter much.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Obama bin Lying

 

[EriktheRed]

Obama bin Lying

Hiya, Frank


The Prez kicked Mitt's ass last night.

Just wanted to let ya know.

 

[NYcarbineer]

This is the right simply changing a story they don't like. This is no different than the UE number scam they tried to pull a couple weeks ago. Didn't like the number, so it must have been faked. Don't like Romney lying and getting caught red handed at it, make up a new story where Romney didn't lie.

 

[Oldstyle]

This is the right simply changing a story they don't like. This is no different than the UE number scam they tried to pull a couple weeks ago. Didn't like the number, so it must have been faked. Don't like Romney lying and getting caught red handed at it, make up a new story where Romney didn't lie.

"This" is simply people pointing out the absurdity of that "story".

The Obama Administration knew there was no demonstration that night in Bengazi because they had access to streaming video of the attack as it occurred that clearly showed there was no crowd outside the embassy before the terrorist attack began.

The truth is...this Administration knew that this was an act of terrorism right from the start. They CHOSE to label it something else for political reasons. They CHOSE to put forth a false narrative that our Ambassador and three other Americans were murdered because of the YouTube video even though they knew that was NOT the case at all.

Why would they do such a thing? It's obvious that the only reason to do what they did was an attempt to save themselves from political embarrassment shortly before the election. That in and of itself angers me but what really disgusts me is that they then had the utter gall to accuse Mitt Romney of playing politics with this issue.

Barack Obama had the chutzpah to stand on that stage...deny that he or anyone in his Administration had misled the American people in any way and called Romney "offensive" for making such a charge. He did so KNOWING that he'd lied and been exposed doing so. Again....why would anyone do something so stupid? Quite simply because THIS President believes that the Main Stream Media will always have his back no matter how blatant the lie is that he tells...and judging from Candy Crowley's performance, his assessment is correct.

 

[Cheddarmelon]

This is the right simply changing a story they don't like. This is no different than the UE number scam they tried to pull a couple weeks ago. Didn't like the number, so it must have been faked. Don't like Romney lying and getting caught red handed at it, make up a new story where Romney didn't lie.

"This" is simply people pointing out the absurdity of that "story".

The Obama Administration knew there was no demonstration that night in Bengazi because they had access to streaming video of the attack as it occurred that clearly showed there was no crowd outside the embassy before the terrorist attack began.

The truth is...this Administration knew that this was an act of terrorism right from the start. They CHOSE to label it something else for political reasons. They CHOSE to put forth a false narrative that our Ambassador and three other Americans were murdered because of the YouTube video even though they knew that was NOT the case at all.

Why would they do such a thing? It's obvious that the only reason to do what they did was an attempt to save themselves from political embarrassment shortly before the election. That in and of itself angers me but what really disgusts me is that they then had the utter gall to accuse Mitt Romney of playing politics with this issue.

Barack Obama had the chutzpah to stand on that stage...deny that he or anyone in his Administration had misled the American people in any way and called Romney "offensive" for making such a charge. He did so KNOWING that he'd lied and been exposed doing so. Again....why would anyone do something so stupid? Quite simply because THIS President believes that the Main Stream Media will always have his back no matter how blatant the lie is that he tells...and judging from Candy Crowley's performance, his assessment is correct.

 

[Interpol]

This is the right simply changing a story they don't like. This is no different than the UE number scam they tried to pull a couple weeks ago. Didn't like the number, so it must have been faked. Don't like Romney lying and getting caught red handed at it, make up a new story where Romney didn't lie.

"This" is simply people pointing out the absurdity of that "story".

The Obama Administration knew there was no demonstration that night in Bengazi because they had access to streaming video of the attack as it occurred that clearly showed there was no crowd outside the embassy before the terrorist attack began.

The truth is...this Administration knew that this was an act of terrorism right from the start. They CHOSE to label it something else for political reasons. They CHOSE to put forth a false narrative that our Ambassador and three other Americans were murdered because of the YouTube video even though they knew that was NOT the case at all.

Why would they do such a thing? It's obvious that the only reason to do what they did was an attempt to save themselves from political embarrassment shortly before the election. That in and of itself angers me but what really disgusts me is that they then had the utter gall to accuse Mitt Romney of playing politics with this issue.

Barack Obama had the chutzpah to stand on that stage...deny that he or anyone in his Administration had misled the American people in any way and called Romney "offensive" for making such a charge. He did so KNOWING that he'd lied and been exposed doing so. Again....why would anyone do something so stupid? Quite simply because THIS President believes that the Main Stream Media will always have his back no matter how blatant the lie is that he tells...and judging from Candy Crowley's performance, his assessment is correct.

In the Middle East, state media rules the day. If the media puts something out, it's as though the government is a sponsor of it.

So when people over there who now get the internet stumble upon right-wing sites--which are all about inflaming anger and not about understanding anything--those people think that the American government is a sponsor to that right-wing bullshit.

So then our government has to come out and explain the actions of the stupid among us, the unpatriotic among us, the hateful and the bigoted among us.

Our government has to explain this so that people learn and understand that the media isn't state-run like over there, and we explain it in order to disconnect this great country from the vile shit the worst among us perpetuate.

So, the right-wing can continue on with this meme that there is some grand conspiracy that says the administration was only thinking about political repercussions, but in fact, the POTUS declared the following day that it was an act of terror, and in the subsequent days following, and ever since.

Meanwhile, what isn't a conspiracy is the fact that Republicans voted to cut security for Embassies.

Suck it.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Crowley's False Fact Check Saves President, Derails Debate​

by John Nolte16 Oct 2012

[snip]
We're done with the second presidential debate, but it was apparent 45 minutes in that between the questions Crowley chose and her handling of who was allowed to speak and when, that this debate was a total and complete setup to rehabilitate Barack Obama.

If these are truly undecided voters, they're apparently undecided between Obama and the Green Party. Moreover, as I write this, Obama's already enjoyed four more minutes of speaking time than Romney. In a ninety-minute debate, that's a big deal.

The lowest and most dishonest part of Crowley's disgraceful "moderation" was when she actually jumped into the debate to take Obama's side when the issue of Benghazi came up. To cover for his and his administration's lying for almost two weeks about the attack coming as the result of a spontaneous protest over a YouTube video, Obama attempted to use as cover the claim that he had called the attack a "terrorist attack" on that very first day during his Rose Garden statement.

Romney correctly disputed that.

Crowley, quite incorrectly, took Obama's side and the crowd exploded.


Read more: Crowley Saves Obama with False Fact-Check

?


Sorry you're wrong.

Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi. Among those killed was our Ambassador, Chris Stevens, as well as Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith. We are still notifying the families of the others who were killed. And today, the American people stand united in holding the families of the four Americans in our thoughts and in our prayers.

The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I've also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.

Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.

Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died.

It's especially tragic that Chris Stevens died in Benghazi because it is a city that he helped to save. At the height of the Libyan revolution, Chris led our diplomatic post in Benghazi. With characteristic skill, courage, and resolve, he built partnerships with Libyan revolutionaries, and helped them as they planned to build a new Libya. When the Qaddafi regime came to an end, Chris was there to serve as our ambassador to the new Libya, and he worked tirelessly to support this young democracy, and I think both Secretary Clinton and I relied deeply on his knowledge of the situation on the ground there. He was a role model to all who worked with him and to the young diplomats who aspire to walk in his footsteps.

Along with his colleagues, Chris died in a country that is still striving to emerge from the recent experience of war. Today, the loss of these four Americans is fresh, but our memories of them linger on. I have no doubt that their legacy will live on through the work that they did far from our shores and in the hearts of those who love them back home.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.

But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in stark contrast to those of their attackers. These four Americans stood up for freedom and human dignity. They should give every American great pride in the country that they served, and the hope that our flag represents to people around the globe who also yearn to live in freedom and with dignity.

We grieve with their families, but let us carry on their memory, and let us continue their work of seeking a stronger America and a better world for all of our children.

Thank you. May God bless the memory of those we lost and may God bless the United States of America.

Candy Crowley was only upholding her obligation as a journalist. When someone lies about something that is not a matter of a opinion - that is either factually true or not - in a forum she is moderating, and she knows for sure its not a truth - she has a journlistic obligation to report the truth. I know the whole idea is a hard thing for FOX Opinions viewers like yourself to swallow, but that's the way journalists are supposed to act.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

yeah we can....it's on every show.....quit watching porn and pay attention to politics......God your dumb.....when did the president call Benghazi a terrorist act and why talk about a video for 2 weeks......talk about dupe

No, the transcript you fools had from the Rose Garden was edited, and the Crowly "apology" video too.

Obama called it an act of terror 9/12, and a terrorist act when intelligence said THAT, and talked about the video in relation to the 20+ countries when THAT was the case.

You people are bamboozled every day by fast talking, bought off charlatans.

francoshit:

The TRANSCRIPT was the WHITE HOUSE transcript, you stupid dishonest diseased dildo.

You are bamboozled by life itself, you hapless hump.

HERE'S THE ******* VIDEO YOU MORON

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=3Nu6VZ9DeVc#t=257s

NOW SUCK ON IT

Do you need another birth certificate or something before you'll accept it as the President's words?

 

[Interpol]

Crowley's False Fact Check Saves President, Derails Debate​

by John Nolte16 Oct 2012

[snip]
We're done with the second presidential debate, but it was apparent 45 minutes in that between the questions Crowley chose and her handling of who was allowed to speak and when, that this debate was a total and complete setup to rehabilitate Barack Obama.

If these are truly undecided voters, they're apparently undecided between Obama and the Green Party. Moreover, as I write this, Obama's already enjoyed four more minutes of speaking time than Romney. In a ninety-minute debate, that's a big deal.

The lowest and most dishonest part of Crowley's disgraceful "moderation" was when she actually jumped into the debate to take Obama's side when the issue of Benghazi came up. To cover for his and his administration's lying for almost two weeks about the attack coming as the result of a spontaneous protest over a YouTube video, Obama attempted to use as cover the claim that he had called the attack a "terrorist attack" on that very first day during his Rose Garden statement.

Romney correctly disputed that.

Crowley, quite incorrectly, took Obama's side and the crowd exploded.


Read more: Crowley Saves Obama with False Fact-Check

?


Sorry you're wrong.

Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi. Among those killed was our Ambassador, Chris Stevens, as well as Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith. We are still notifying the families of the others who were killed. And today, the American people stand united in holding the families of the four Americans in our thoughts and in our prayers.

The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I've also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.

Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.

Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died.

It's especially tragic that Chris Stevens died in Benghazi because it is a city that he helped to save. At the height of the Libyan revolution, Chris led our diplomatic post in Benghazi. With characteristic skill, courage, and resolve, he built partnerships with Libyan revolutionaries, and helped them as they planned to build a new Libya. When the Qaddafi regime came to an end, Chris was there to serve as our ambassador to the new Libya, and he worked tirelessly to support this young democracy, and I think both Secretary Clinton and I relied deeply on his knowledge of the situation on the ground there. He was a role model to all who worked with him and to the young diplomats who aspire to walk in his footsteps.

Along with his colleagues, Chris died in a country that is still striving to emerge from the recent experience of war. Today, the loss of these four Americans is fresh, but our memories of them linger on. I have no doubt that their legacy will live on through the work that they did far from our shores and in the hearts of those who love them back home.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.

But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in stark contrast to those of their attackers. These four Americans stood up for freedom and human dignity. They should give every American great pride in the country that they served, and the hope that our flag represents to people around the globe who also yearn to live in freedom and with dignity.

We grieve with their families, but let us carry on their memory, and let us continue their work of seeking a stronger America and a better world for all of our children.

Thank you. May God bless the memory of those we lost and may God bless the United States of America.

Candy Crowley was only upholding her obligation as a journalist. When someone lies about something that is not a matter of a opinion - that is either factually true or not - in a forum she is moderating, and she knows for sure its not a truth - she has a journlistic obligation to report the truth. I know the whole idea is a hard thing for FOX Opinions viewers like yourself to swallow, but that's the way journalists are supposed to act.

But, but, but.....he could have been talking about ANY NUMBER of terror attacks!!!

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Crowley's False Fact Check Saves President, Derails Debate​

by John Nolte16 Oct 2012

[snip]
We're done with the second presidential debate, but it was apparent 45 minutes in that between the questions Crowley chose and her handling of who was allowed to speak and when, that this debate was a total and complete setup to rehabilitate Barack Obama.

If these are truly undecided voters, they're apparently undecided between Obama and the Green Party. Moreover, as I write this, Obama's already enjoyed four more minutes of speaking time than Romney. In a ninety-minute debate, that's a big deal.

The lowest and most dishonest part of Crowley's disgraceful "moderation" was when she actually jumped into the debate to take Obama's side when the issue of Benghazi came up. To cover for his and his administration's lying for almost two weeks about the attack coming as the result of a spontaneous protest over a YouTube video, Obama attempted to use as cover the claim that he had called the attack a "terrorist attack" on that very first day during his Rose Garden statement.

Romney correctly disputed that.

Crowley, quite incorrectly, took Obama's side and the crowd exploded.


Read more: Crowley Saves Obama with False Fact-Check

?


Sorry you're wrong.

Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi. Among those killed was our Ambassador, Chris Stevens, as well as Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith. We are still notifying the families of the others who were killed. And today, the American people stand united in holding the families of the four Americans in our thoughts and in our prayers.

The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I've also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.

Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.

Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died.

It's especially tragic that Chris Stevens died in Benghazi because it is a city that he helped to save. At the height of the Libyan revolution, Chris led our diplomatic post in Benghazi. With characteristic skill, courage, and resolve, he built partnerships with Libyan revolutionaries, and helped them as they planned to build a new Libya. When the Qaddafi regime came to an end, Chris was there to serve as our ambassador to the new Libya, and he worked tirelessly to support this young democracy, and I think both Secretary Clinton and I relied deeply on his knowledge of the situation on the ground there. He was a role model to all who worked with him and to the young diplomats who aspire to walk in his footsteps.

Along with his colleagues, Chris died in a country that is still striving to emerge from the recent experience of war. Today, the loss of these four Americans is fresh, but our memories of them linger on. I have no doubt that their legacy will live on through the work that they did far from our shores and in the hearts of those who love them back home.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.

But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in stark contrast to those of their attackers. These four Americans stood up for freedom and human dignity. They should give every American great pride in the country that they served, and the hope that our flag represents to people around the globe who also yearn to live in freedom and with dignity.

We grieve with their families, but let us carry on their memory, and let us continue their work of seeking a stronger America and a better world for all of our children.

Thank you. May God bless the memory of those we lost and may God bless the United States of America.

Candy Crowley was only upholding her obligation as a journalist. When someone lies about something that is not a matter of a opinion - that is either factually true or not - in a forum she is moderating, and she knows for sure its not a truth - she has a journlistic obligation to report the truth. I know the whole idea is a hard thing for FOX Opinions viewers like yourself to swallow, but that's the way journalists are supposed to act.

But, but, but.....he could have been talking about ANY NUMBER of terror attacks!!!

You'd think that would be purely satirical but I guarantee you what you have just said will be echoed by a rightie moron soon enough. They will actually sit there and tell you straight faced.