Crisis at the National Archives (Obama Destruction of Documents)

[excalibur]

Yep, and the MSM, the DoJ, the FBI, and Democrats in Congress could care less about the destruction of documents by Øbama and his crew. They did nothing about it then or since.

...​

​

To support this effort, in 2014 President Obama signed the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments. For the first time electronic government records were placed under the 1950 Federal Records Act. The new law also included updates clarifying "the responsibilities of federal government officials when using non-government email systems" and empowering "the National Archives to safeguard original and classified records from unauthorized removal.” Additionally, it gives the Archivist of the United States the final authority in determining just what is a government record.​

​

And yet the accumulation of recent congressional testimony has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and “loss” of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges. So far, former President Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Lynch and several EPA officials have been named as offenders. The IRS suffered record “losses” as well. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy called it “an unauthorized private communications system for official business for the patent purpose of defeating federal record-keeping and disclosure laws.”​

​

Clearly, America’s National Archives is facing the first major challenge to its historic role in preserving the records of the United States. What good is the National Archives administering a presidential library, like the planned Obama library in Chicago, if it is missing critical records of interest to scholars? And what’s to prevent evasion of the entire federal records system by subsequent administrations to suit current politics rather than serve scholars for centuries to come?​

​

...​

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/06/10/crisis_at_the_national_archives_137241.html

 

[Moonglow]

Why did Trump not do anything?

 

[konradv]

Yep, and the MSM, the DoJ, the FBI, and Democrats in Congress could care less about the destruction of documents by Øbama and his crew. They did nothing about it then or since.

...​

​

To support this effort, in 2014 President Obama signed the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments. For the first time electronic government records were placed under the 1950 Federal Records Act. The new law also included updates clarifying "the responsibilities of federal government officials when using non-government email systems" and empowering "the National Archives to safeguard original and classified records from unauthorized removal.” Additionally, it gives the Archivist of the United States the final authority in determining just what is a government record.​

​

And yet the accumulation of recent congressional testimony has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and “loss” of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges. So far, former President Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Lynch and several EPA officials have been named as offenders. The IRS suffered record “losses” as well. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy called it “an unauthorized private communications system for official business for the patent purpose of defeating federal record-keeping and disclosure laws.”​

​

Clearly, America’s National Archives is facing the first major challenge to its historic role in preserving the records of the United States. What good is the National Archives administering a presidential library, like the planned Obama library in Chicago, if it is missing critical records of interest to scholars? And what’s to prevent evasion of the entire federal records system by subsequent administrations to suit current politics rather than serve scholars for centuries to come?​

​

...​

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/06/10/crisis_at_the_national_archives_137241.html

You’re citing four year old articles in ‘Current Events’?

 

[Truth2Know]

Down the memory hole you go...

 

[jehanne1431]

You’re citing four year old articles in ‘Current Events’?

If it is still true, his is citing a lot more than just that.

 

[excalibur]

You’re citing four year old articles in ‘Current Events’?

And?

 

[Rogue AI]

You’re citing four year old articles in ‘Current Events’?

Made current due the malfeasance and corruption found in Brandon's administration.

 

[2aguy]

But……Obama and his people are democrats…..silly rabbit…….tricks only apply to republicans…..

 

[konradv]

And?

Need I say more?!?!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Need I say more?!?!

Need HE say more?

 

[konradv]

Need HE say more?

He needs to say something. There are standards for coherence that aren’t being met!

 

[jknowgood]

 

[Resnic]

Yep, and the MSM, the DoJ, the FBI, and Democrats in Congress could care less about the destruction of documents by Øbama and his crew. They did nothing about it then or since.

...​

​

To support this effort, in 2014 President Obama signed the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments. For the first time electronic government records were placed under the 1950 Federal Records Act. The new law also included updates clarifying "the responsibilities of federal government officials when using non-government email systems" and empowering "the National Archives to safeguard original and classified records from unauthorized removal.” Additionally, it gives the Archivist of the United States the final authority in determining just what is a government record.​

​

And yet the accumulation of recent congressional testimony has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and “loss” of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges. So far, former President Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Lynch and several EPA officials have been named as offenders. The IRS suffered record “losses” as well. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy called it “an unauthorized private communications system for official business for the patent purpose of defeating federal record-keeping and disclosure laws.”​

​

Clearly, America’s National Archives is facing the first major challenge to its historic role in preserving the records of the United States. What good is the National Archives administering a presidential library, like the planned Obama library in Chicago, if it is missing critical records of interest to scholars? And what’s to prevent evasion of the entire federal records system by subsequent administrations to suit current politics rather than serve scholars for centuries to come?​

​

...​

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/06/10/crisis_at_the_national_archives_137241.html

Just remember. This is the same institution that pulled this bullshit

National Archives introduces 'harmful language alert' for records, including Constitution

The National Archives Records Administration has placed a "harmful language alert" on records in the website's catalog, including the nation's founding documents.

news.yahoo.com

 

[justaschmuck9]

View attachment 682254

great cartoon

Night of the Living Dead