Crazy eyes Cortez trying to chase jobs away from New York

[conserveguy877]

G500 now has gone full tilt insecure over crazy eyes cortez terrible math skills. Good example where the real misogyny is. Sad!

Again, show me where he math is wrong. You can't do it. Now that your stupid meme you have been parroting is broken, you are in a quandry and just double down on your stupidity by repeating something which has already been proven to be false.

So go ahead. Show me where the math is wrong. I have proven it is correct. It is a fact we would spend less on health care than we do now if we switched to UHC.

There you go with parroting your crazy eyes girl again. First figure out if she can do the math on her apartment.

If your rent or mortgage payment dropped, how would you be able to afford that lower rent/mortgage?

If the amount our country pays for health care dropped, how would we be able to afford that lower cost?

G500 now has gone full tilt insecure over crazy eyes cortez terrible math skills. Good example where the real misogyny is. Sad!

Again, show me where he math is wrong. You can't do it. Now that your stupid meme you have been parroting is broken, you are in a quandry and just double down on your stupidity by repeating something which has already been proven to be false.

So go ahead. Show me where the math is wrong. I have proven it is correct. It is a fact we would spend less on health care than we do now if we switched to UHC.

There you go with parroting your crazy eyes girl again. First figure out if she can do the math on her apartment.

If your rent or mortgage payment dropped, how would you be able to afford that lower rent/mortgage?

If the amount our country pays for health care dropped, how would we be able to afford that lower cost?

 

[g5000]

The airheads at Fox News were asking the wrong question, and the commie was trying to dumb it down so that even they could understand how stupid their question was. But it backfired. The Fox News airheads, and their parroting rube viewers, are even dumber than she realized.

Asking how we could afford UHC was the same as asking how you can afford lower rent. It's a stupid question.

If your rent was lowered, you would not ask your landlord how you were going to be able to afford the new lower rent. You would just pay it, and be happy about it.

Just so with UHC. Our national health care cost would be lower, and it is stupid to ask how we could afford it.

But that is just what the Fox News airheads asked. How can we afford cheaper health care?

It is THEIR math which is fucked.

Which is why they are going to lose and we are going to end up with UHC.

 

[Votto]

I don't pay $1,200 out of pocket. I just explained to you that I pay $550 out of pocket and that includes dental and vision. Just health is closer to $485 out of pocket and I can choose any doctor and don't have to be constrained by a Gov't body. Do you not speak English? Anything and everything run by the gov't vs. the private sector is waaaaaaaaaaaay worse. Hence capitalism works so well most of the time. Now you want me to pay almost 3x more for worse service? How is that feasible?

Jesus, man. It was an analogy to help you grasp the principle at work, you dumb ****.

Countries with UHC pay far less per capita for health care than we do. You totally made up your "3x more" figure. It has no attachment to reality whatsoever.

You are trying to move the goalposts now.

Do the math, simpleton. IF you pay $1200 a month out of pocket for health insurance/health care, and then we switch to UHC and your out of pocket expenses go to ZERO, but you pay an extra $1100 a month in taxes to pay for UHC, are you coming out ahead or behind?

You gave the $1,200 number not me. Come up witha real number and we can debate.

Oh, you want an exact number? No problem, retard.

We pay an average of $7200 PER PERSON each year for health care.

If we enact UHC and the PER PERSON cost dropped to $3300 (the median amount paid by other OECD countries), would we come out ahead or behind?


You simply cannot explain how the commie's math is wrong. You parroted a bullshit meme and now you are stuck looking like an idiot.

Who is WE??!?!?! Not true. I pay a lot less. What commie? I just gave you the laser eye surgery example. Learn to read, you dumb Leftist.

How expensive would a single-payer system be?

Wow. I can't deal with this kind of retardation.

The commie wasn't talking about you, idiot. She was talking about the TOTAL COST FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.

She is saying the cost PER CAPITA would go down. And she is probably right.

Before we go further, you need to know I am very much opposed to UHC. But I am sick and tired of retards like you allowing the ******* commies to win through your stupidity.

G500 now has gone full tilt insecure over crazy eyes cortez terrible math skills. Good example where the real misogyny is. Sad!

Again, show me where he math is wrong. You can't do it. Now that your stupid meme you have been parroting is broken, you are in a quandry and just double down on your stupidity by repeating something which has already been proven to be false.

So go ahead. Show me where the math is wrong. I have proven it is correct. It is a fact we would spend less on health care than we do now if we switched to UHC.

Why not listen to members of your own democrat party who did the numbers and now are backing away from a Single payer system?

In North Carolina, Democratic State Representative Verla Insko moved to kill her own pro-single-payer bill. An assessment from the state legislature's Fiscal Research Division pegged the cost of single-payer at $70 billion, $42 billion of which would have to come from the state. That latter figure is almost twice the state budget.

 

[Votto]

The airheads at Fox News were asking the wrong question, and the commie was trying to dumb it down so that even they could understand how stupid their question was. But it backfired. The Fox News airheads, and their parroting rube viewers, are even dumber than she realized.

Asking how we could afford UHC was the same as asking how you can afford lower rent. It's a stupid question.

If your rent was lowered, you would not ask your landlord how you were going to be able to afford the new lower rent. You would just pay it, and be happy about it.

Just so with UHC. Our national health care cost would be lower, and it is stupid to ask how we could afford it.

But that is just what the Fox News airheads asked. How can we afford cheaper health care?

It is THEIR math which is fucked.

Interestingly, Veterans have a single payer system with the government, but sadly, many opt out because they want better treatment.

Now if they are putting Veterans on secret death lists in Arizona to help cut costs, why would the average citizen fair any better?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

My wife's plan is $550 per month for the family and includes Dental and VSP. Company pays 60% and she pays 40%. Now you want me to pay more in taxes and have the Government control the medical system, which will make it worse? No thank you.

So your problem is duh gubmint! and not the savings...correct?

??? Both ???

I gave the laser eye surgery example and I live in Boston. I am not some hick from the South. Save your comedy, Marky. I will gladly compare resumes with you any day.

 

[g5000]

The airheads at Fox News were asking the wrong question, and the commie was trying to dumb it down so that even they could understand how stupid their question was. But it backfired. The Fox News airheads, and their parroting rube viewers, are even dumber than she realized.

Asking how we could afford UHC was the same as asking how you can afford lower rent. It's a stupid question.

If your rent was lowered, you would not ask your landlord how you were going to be able to afford the new lower rent. You would just pay it, and be happy about it.

Just so with UHC. Our national health care cost would be lower, and it is stupid to ask how we could afford it.

But that is just what the Fox News airheads asked. How can we afford cheaper health care?

It is THEIR math which is fucked.

Interestingly, Veterans have a single payer system with the government, but sadly, many opt out because they want better treatment.

Now if they are putting Veterans on secret death lists in Arizona to help cut costs, why would the average citizen fair any better?

I'm a retired veteran. I use Tricare. I am able to use the same doctors as my neighbors. I have never used the VA.

I would NEVER opt out of Tricare. It is way, way, way cheaper than what employers offer.

 

[bendog]

Ocasio-Cortez Claims New Yorkers Are ‘Outraged’ Over Opening of New Amazon Headquarters

While most states are begging Amazon to put their headquarters in their state to drastically improve their local economy, Crazy Eyes Cortez is busy trying to chase them out of New York, one of two places they decided to put their headquarters.

She says that they have been given too many perks and not paying enough taxes as the infrastructure in New York crumbles.

So I guess with or without Amazon, the infrastructure in New York will crumble.

Hilarious

I personally want to thank the dead head socialists of New York for electing this high school student to the US Congress.

It's the same complaint of the libertarians that govt incentives (tax give aways) shouldn't be used to bribe employers to locate in specific locals.

 

[g5000]

Jesus, man. It was an analogy to help you grasp the principle at work, you dumb ****.

Countries with UHC pay far less per capita for health care than we do. You totally made up your "3x more" figure. It has no attachment to reality whatsoever.

You are trying to move the goalposts now.

Do the math, simpleton. IF you pay $1200 a month out of pocket for health insurance/health care, and then we switch to UHC and your out of pocket expenses go to ZERO, but you pay an extra $1100 a month in taxes to pay for UHC, are you coming out ahead or behind?

You gave the $1,200 number not me. Come up witha real number and we can debate.

Oh, you want an exact number? No problem, retard.

We pay an average of $7200 PER PERSON each year for health care.

If we enact UHC and the PER PERSON cost dropped to $3300 (the median amount paid by other OECD countries), would we come out ahead or behind?


You simply cannot explain how the commie's math is wrong. You parroted a bullshit meme and now you are stuck looking like an idiot.

Who is WE??!?!?! Not true. I pay a lot less. What commie? I just gave you the laser eye surgery example. Learn to read, you dumb Leftist.

How expensive would a single-payer system be?

Wow. I can't deal with this kind of retardation.

The commie wasn't talking about you, idiot. She was talking about the TOTAL COST FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.

She is saying the cost PER CAPITA would go down. And she is probably right.

Before we go further, you need to know I am very much opposed to UHC. But I am sick and tired of retards like you allowing the ******* commies to win through your stupidity.

G500 now has gone full tilt insecure over crazy eyes cortez terrible math skills. Good example where the real misogyny is. Sad!

Again, show me where he math is wrong. You can't do it. Now that your stupid meme you have been parroting is broken, you are in a quandry and just double down on your stupidity by repeating something which has already been proven to be false.

So go ahead. Show me where the math is wrong. I have proven it is correct. It is a fact we would spend less on health care than we do now if we switched to UHC.

Why not listen to members of your own democrat party who did the numbers and now are backing away from a Single payer system?

In North Carolina, Democratic State Representative Verla Insko moved to kill her own pro-single-payer bill. An assessment from the state legislature's Fiscal Research Division pegged the cost of single-payer at $70 billion, $42 billion of which would have to come from the state. That latter figure is almost twice the state budget.

I am not a member of the "democrat [sic] party". I was a Republican all my life until this year. Now I am a registered Independent.

As for a state level UHC, the only way UHC will ever be viable is on a national scale. And that is because of the current structure of our health care system which has been more and more federalized over the decades since LBJ.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You gave the $1,200 number not me. Come up witha real number and we can debate.

Oh, you want an exact number? No problem, retard.

We pay an average of $7200 PER PERSON each year for health care.

If we enact UHC and the PER PERSON cost dropped to $3300 (the median amount paid by other OECD countries), would we come out ahead or behind?


You simply cannot explain how the commie's math is wrong. You parroted a bullshit meme and now you are stuck looking like an idiot.

Who is WE??!?!?! Not true. I pay a lot less. What commie? I just gave you the laser eye surgery example. Learn to read, you dumb Leftist.

How expensive would a single-payer system be?

Wow. I can't deal with this kind of retardation.

The commie wasn't talking about you, idiot. She was talking about the TOTAL COST FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.

She is saying the cost PER CAPITA would go down. And she is probably right.

Before we go further, you need to know I am very much opposed to UHC. But I am sick and tired of retards like you allowing the ******* commies to win through your stupidity.

G500 now has gone full tilt insecure over crazy eyes cortez terrible math skills. Good example where the real misogyny is. Sad!

Again, show me where he math is wrong. You can't do it. Now that your stupid meme you have been parroting is broken, you are in a quandry and just double down on your stupidity by repeating something which has already been proven to be false.

So go ahead. Show me where the math is wrong. I have proven it is correct. It is a fact we would spend less on health care than we do now if we switched to UHC.

Why not listen to members of your own democrat party who did the numbers and now are backing away from a Single payer system?

In North Carolina, Democratic State Representative Verla Insko moved to kill her own pro-single-payer bill. An assessment from the state legislature's Fiscal Research Division pegged the cost of single-payer at $70 billion, $42 billion of which would have to come from the state. That latter figure is almost twice the state budget.

I am not a member of the "democrat [sic] party". I was a Republican all my life until this year. Now I am a registered Independent.

As for a state level UHC, the only way UHC will ever be viable is on a national scale. And that is because of the current structure of our health care system which has been more and more federalized over the decades since LBJ.

So then you may be reasonable. Why not follow the same model as Botox and Laser Eye surgery?

 

[g5000]

"secret death lists in Arizona"

The parroting rubes never learn.

 

[hadit]

How about her "math" regarding paying for Nationalized Healthcare? Please explain that rationale.

Her math is sound. Why don't you explain why it isn't?

Because $2Trn, which is the cost of Trump tax cuts does not equal $32.7Trn.

Basic math, that even a gay, Leftist clown should be able to do. Unless you believe 2 is greater than 32.7?

That $32.7 trillion is how much would be spend over ten years.

We currently spend $3.3 trillion a year on health care. Over ten years, that is $33 trillion.

So please explain why her math is not sound.

So we would need to spend double that to meet the additional $33Trn. Do you not see that?

Once again, if you pay $1200 a month out of pocket for health insurance/health care, and then we switch to UHC and your out of pocket expenses go to ZERO, but you pay an extra $1100 a month in taxes to pay for UHC, are you coming out ahead or behind?

This is basic math. You can do it!

Interesting number you picked, $1200. Where did you get it?

 

[BluesLegend]

I love that she's the new leader of the Democratic party

 

[g5000]

Oh, you want an exact number? No problem, retard.

We pay an average of $7200 PER PERSON each year for health care.

If we enact UHC and the PER PERSON cost dropped to $3300 (the median amount paid by other OECD countries), would we come out ahead or behind?


You simply cannot explain how the commie's math is wrong. You parroted a bullshit meme and now you are stuck looking like an idiot.

Who is WE??!?!?! Not true. I pay a lot less. What commie? I just gave you the laser eye surgery example. Learn to read, you dumb Leftist.

How expensive would a single-payer system be?

Wow. I can't deal with this kind of retardation.

The commie wasn't talking about you, idiot. She was talking about the TOTAL COST FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.

She is saying the cost PER CAPITA would go down. And she is probably right.

Before we go further, you need to know I am very much opposed to UHC. But I am sick and tired of retards like you allowing the ******* commies to win through your stupidity.

G500 now has gone full tilt insecure over crazy eyes cortez terrible math skills. Good example where the real misogyny is. Sad!

Again, show me where he math is wrong. You can't do it. Now that your stupid meme you have been parroting is broken, you are in a quandry and just double down on your stupidity by repeating something which has already been proven to be false.

So go ahead. Show me where the math is wrong. I have proven it is correct. It is a fact we would spend less on health care than we do now if we switched to UHC.

Why not listen to members of your own democrat party who did the numbers and now are backing away from a Single payer system?

In North Carolina, Democratic State Representative Verla Insko moved to kill her own pro-single-payer bill. An assessment from the state legislature's Fiscal Research Division pegged the cost of single-payer at $70 billion, $42 billion of which would have to come from the state. That latter figure is almost twice the state budget.

I am not a member of the "democrat [sic] party". I was a Republican all my life until this year. Now I am a registered Independent.

As for a state level UHC, the only way UHC will ever be viable is on a national scale. And that is because of the current structure of our health care system which has been more and more federalized over the decades since LBJ.

So then you may be reasonable. Why not follow the same model as Botox and Laser Eye surgery?

Botox and laser eye surgery are ELECTIVE surgeries.

Apples and oranges.

 

[night_son]

Ocasio-Cortez Claims New Yorkers Are ‘Outraged’ Over Opening of New Amazon Headquarters

While most states are begging Amazon to put their headquarters in their state to drastically improve their local economy, Crazy Eyes Cortez is busy trying to chase them out of New York, one of two places they decided to put their headquarters.

She says that they have been given too many perks and not paying enough taxes as the infrastructure in New York crumbles.

So I guess with or without Amazon, the infrastructure in New York will crumble.

Hilarious

I personally want to thank the dead head socialists of New York for electing this high school student to the US Congress.

Holy Chupacabra!

 

[g5000]

I love that she's the new leader of the Democratic party

No she isn't. But she is the new bugaboo of your propaganda party.

She has you all shitting your pants.

A woman who hasn't even been sworn in yet. A future junior congresswoman from a tiny district in New York.

 

[BluesLegend]

I love that she's the new leader of the Democratic party

No she isn't. But she is the new bugaboo of your propaganda party.

She has you all shitting your pants.

We will paint her as the Dem's new leader whether they want her to be or not.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Who is WE??!?!?! Not true. I pay a lot less. What commie? I just gave you the laser eye surgery example. Learn to read, you dumb Leftist.

How expensive would a single-payer system be?

Wow. I can't deal with this kind of retardation.

The commie wasn't talking about you, idiot. She was talking about the TOTAL COST FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.

She is saying the cost PER CAPITA would go down. And she is probably right.

Before we go further, you need to know I am very much opposed to UHC. But I am sick and tired of retards like you allowing the ******* commies to win through your stupidity.

G500 now has gone full tilt insecure over crazy eyes cortez terrible math skills. Good example where the real misogyny is. Sad!

Again, show me where he math is wrong. You can't do it. Now that your stupid meme you have been parroting is broken, you are in a quandry and just double down on your stupidity by repeating something which has already been proven to be false.

So go ahead. Show me where the math is wrong. I have proven it is correct. It is a fact we would spend less on health care than we do now if we switched to UHC.

Why not listen to members of your own democrat party who did the numbers and now are backing away from a Single payer system?

In North Carolina, Democratic State Representative Verla Insko moved to kill her own pro-single-payer bill. An assessment from the state legislature's Fiscal Research Division pegged the cost of single-payer at $70 billion, $42 billion of which would have to come from the state. That latter figure is almost twice the state budget.

I am not a member of the "democrat [sic] party". I was a Republican all my life until this year. Now I am a registered Independent.

As for a state level UHC, the only way UHC will ever be viable is on a national scale. And that is because of the current structure of our health care system which has been more and more federalized over the decades since LBJ.

So then you may be reasonable. Why not follow the same model as Botox and Laser Eye surgery?

Botox and laser eye surgery are ELECTIVE surgeries.

Apples and oranges.

Yes but the system works. If I sprain an ankle, have the flu or cut myself while slicing tomatoes I should not have to rely on super expensive insurane. How about insuring for only very critical and significant injuries and the rest we let the free market decide?

 

[MarcATL]

We, she got elected, so. She can't be that dumb. Actually it's pretty smart move if you ask me.

Getting elected = being smart? Since when?

You're right, because the current POTUS is. One. Big. Dummy.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

We, she got elected, so. She can't be that dumb. Actually it's pretty smart move if you ask me.

Getting elected = being smart? Since when?

You're right, because the current POTUS is. One. Big. Dummy.

One big billionaire who dates and marries models and now is the most powerful man in the world? That dummy? LOL

Your TDS is working OT, Marky. How many languages do you speak?

 

[MarcATL]

Once again, if you pay $1200 a month out of pocket for health insurance/health care, and then we switch to UHC and your out of pocket expenses go to ZERO, but you pay an extra $1100 a month in taxes to pay for UHC, are you coming out ahead or behind?

This is basic math. You can do it!

I don't pay $1,200 out of pocket. I just explained to you that I pay $550 out of pocket and that includes dental and vision. Just health is closer to $485 out of pocket and I can choose any doctor and don't have to be constrained by a Gov't body. Do you not speak English? Anything and everything run by the gov't vs. the private sector is waaaaaaaaaaaay worse. Hence capitalism works so well most of the time. Now you want me to pay almost 3x more for worse service? How is that feasible?

Jesus, man. It was an analogy to help you grasp the principle at work, you dumb ****.

Countries with UHC pay far less per capita for health care than we do. You totally made up your "3x more" figure. It has no attachment to reality whatsoever.

You are trying to move the goalposts now.

Do the math, simpleton. IF you pay $1200 a month out of pocket for health insurance/health care, and then we switch to UHC and your out of pocket expenses go to ZERO, but you pay an extra $1100 a month in taxes to pay for UHC, are you coming out ahead or behind?

Here's the thing, far rightwing palookas like AzogtheDefiler won't get it, because they don't want to. Period. No matter how better the math is, how good it will be for them, they just don't want to. They are ideologically against it. They have purposed in their hearts not to let one. single. solitary. fact, penetrate their brains.

Lost case, buddy.