CPAC: Speaker pledges end of American democracy to wild applause.

[progressive hunter]

It depends on how you define the "public".

Are we still a republic if we only let white land-owning males vote in elections?

and if we allow martians to run things they would ban people from saturn to use the womens restrooms,,,

anymore make believe games you want to play??

it depends on how you define stupid cock sucker,,

 

[martybegan]

The reason you guys are so afraid of the word democratic is that you think you have the authority to determine who's vote counts and who's vote is to be disregarded.

No, it's because dems equate it with strict majority rule, which is mob rule.

 

[Marener]

and if we allow martians to run things they would ban people from saturn to use the womens restrooms,,,

anymore make believe games you want to play??

it depends on how you define stupid cock sucker,,

Are we still a republic if we only let white land-owning males vote in elections?

 

[progressive hunter]

Does America have any part of representative democracy (ie. do you get to vote for someone to represent you in government)?

whats the constitution say??

it says a republic form of government and what else?? we vote for our reps,,

so beings the CONSTITUTION requires a REPUBLIC form of government that means we are a constitutional republic,,

 

[progressive hunter]

No, it's because dems equate it with strict majority rule, which is mob rule.

what theyre doing is trying to gaslight younger generations away from constitutional rule into mob rule,,

 

[Marener]

No, it's because dems equate it with strict majority rule, which is mob rule.

Dems equate it with providing equal voice to all citizens. Republicans want to pick and choose who's voice counts because they'd rather distort the system than convince others of their platform.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

why is it you never explain anything and just rant like a 5 yr old girl??


what about obama and biden ruling by EOs and bypassing the system in favor of a dictatorship??

Trump is on pace to sign more executive orders than any ...​

CNN
https://www.cnn.com › 2017/10/13 › politics › donald-tr...
Oct 13, 2017 — On Thursday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at allowing people to band together to seek more affordable health ...

On Thursday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at allowing people to band together to seek more affordable health insurance, a move some consider an attempt to cripple the Affordable Care Act.

It was the 49th executive order that Trump has signed since coming into office on January 20. The last president to sign that many executive orders through October 13 of his first year in office? Lyndon Johnson.

Which makes the fact that Obama had signed roughly half of the executive orders at this point in 2009 as Trump has signed so far in 2017 rich with irony.

Trump outstripping Obama on pace of executive orders​

AP News
https://apnews.com › ...
Oct 19, 2019 — President Donald Trump seems to have discovered it's easier and often more satisfying to get things done through administrative action.

It wasn’t too long ago that Donald Trump derided presidential executive orders as “power grabs” and a “basic disaster.”

He’s switched sides in a big way: In each year of his presidency, he has issued more executive orders than did former President Barack Obama during the same time span. He surpassed Obama’s third-year total just recently.

Back in 2012, Trump had tweeted: “Why Is @BarackObama constantly issuing executive orders that are major power grabs of authority?”

 

[progressive hunter]

Dems equate it with providing equal voice to all citizens. Republicans want to pick and choose who's voice counts because they'd rather distort the system than convince others of their platform.

so you think promoting the constitution that requires people vote for their reps means we dont want people voting for their reps??

 

[progressive hunter]

Trump is on pace to sign more executive orders than any ...​

View attachment 908751
CNN
https://www.cnn.com › 2017/10/13 › politics › donald-tr...
Oct 13, 2017 — On Thursday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at allowing people to band together to seek more affordable health ...

On Thursday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at allowing people to band together to seek more affordable health insurance, a move some consider an attempt to cripple the Affordable Care Act.

It was the 49th executive order that Trump has signed since coming into office on January 20. The last president to sign that many executive orders through October 13 of his first year in office? Lyndon Johnson.

Which makes the fact that Obama had signed roughly half of the executive orders at this point in 2009 as Trump has signed so far in 2017 rich with irony.

Trump outstripping Obama on pace of executive orders​

View attachment 908752
AP News
https://apnews.com › ...
Oct 19, 2019 — President Donald Trump seems to have discovered it's easier and often more satisfying to get things done through administrative action.

It wasn’t too long ago that Donald Trump derided presidential executive orders as “power grabs” and a “basic disaster.”

He’s switched sides in a big way: In each year of his presidency, he has issued more executive orders than did former President Barack Obama during the same time span. He surpassed Obama’s third-year total just recently.

Back in 2012, Trump had tweeted: “Why Is @BarackObama constantly issuing executive orders that are major power grabs of authority?”

so youre only against them when repubes do them,,

got it,,

 

[AMart]

That is exactly why you folks don’t give a damn about our democratic institutions.

And those inside those corrupt institutions virtually nobody gets elected. This is really what the lefts means democracy .... they mean corrupt institutions controlled by people who don't believe in the constitution.

 

[Marener]

so you think promoting the constitution that requires people vote for their reps means we dont want people voting for their reps??

You want to use gerrymandering to minimize the voices of some and maximize the voices of others.

 

[CowboyTed]

No, it's because dems equate it with strict majority rule, which is mob rule.

While the speaker wants to be run by a bunch of religious clerics on there interpretation of the Bible...

For example: Jesus said nothing about abortion or IVF and yet someone reads the Bible and gets that from it...

 

[Captain Caveman]

What's the constitution say??

it says a republic form of government and what else?? we vote for our reps,,

so beings the CONSTITUTION requires a REPUBLIC form of government that means we are a constitutional republic,,

Yes, a republic's head of state is called a president and a King or Queen as head of state is called a constitutional democracy.

It's just all word play. Democracy is where the people make the laws, if everyone voted on all laws, that's pure direct democracy. But everyone can't fit into Congress/the Commons, so you vote for a person to represent you to vote on the laws. Read about Switzerland and direct democracy.

Whether or not the US constitution contains the word democracy, in modern political terminology, the part where you vote for someone to represent you in making laws, that bit is called representative democracy.

Edit - if you say Republic and I say Republic with representative democracy, both are right, it doesn't effect how America runs or is running.

 

[progressive hunter]

You want to use gerrymandering to minimize the voices of some and maximize the voices of others.

when you stop moving the goal posts and spinning in circles get back to me,,

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

so youre only against them when repubes do them,,

got it,,

Nope, just pointing out the hypocrisy...........And lies.
Ideas are best when the president has the backing and votes in congress.
It just doesn't work that way anymore.

 

[CowboyTed]

Could someone show us a country that said we are going run a country on the interpretations of religious text by religious experts?

Can we see how that is going or went?
I see a lot of Democracies going well... Actually the top countries in the world for human development index are all representative democracies..

 

[Marener]

when you stop moving the goal posts and spinning in circles get back to me,,

You already demonstrated you have a very limited intellectual capacity to debate.

Is it still a republic if only white land-owning males can vote for representatives?

 

[progressive hunter]

Yes, a republic's head of state is called a president and a King or Queen as head of state is called a constitutional democracy.

It's just all word play. Democracy is where the people make the laws, if everyone voted on all laws, that's pure direct democracy. But everyone can't fit into Congress/the Commons, so you vote for a person to represent you to vote on the laws. Read about Switzerland and direct democracy.

Whether or not the US constitution contains the word democracy, in modern political terminology, the part where you vote for someone to represent you in making laws, that bit is called representative democracy.

we arent a republic because its to complicated to have everyone vote,, we are one because people are stupid and some are evil and some would use that vote to oppress others like democrats did with slavery,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Could someone show us a country that said we are going run a country on the interpretations of religious text by religious experts?

Can we see how that is going or went?

your welcome,,

 

[martybegan]

Dems equate it with providing equal voice to all citizens. Republicans want to pick and choose who's voice counts because they'd rather distort the system than convince others of their platform.

And non citizens, dead citizens, and any citizen who threw out their ballot (they just assume those people are Biden voters).