CPAC Attendee Hands Out 'Seven-Point Plan' To Reinstall donald trump

These people are totally bat crap crazy.
In all seriousness, my guess is that CPAC knows how gullible and conned the base is, and they're just keeping the fire lit for fundraising.

I don't believe, at least for now, that knowledgeable people higher up really believe any of this post-election madness.

CPAC used to hold one conference per year but now that they need the money, they’re holding two conferences this year because grifters gotta grift.

It is shocking to those of us who live outside the United States that your country allows a political group with the stated purpose of overthrowing the democratically elected government of the United States, to continue to promote lies, sedition, and White in any other country in the world would be called “treason”.

There seem to be no legal consequences for Republicans who continue to spread lies and propaganda in the wake of the 2020 election.
You say they are lie's, yet you can't prove them lie's because the court's haven't heard the case's, and refuse to hear the cases in which is a travesty of justice in regards to the American population. That has been one aspect of this thing, and it leaves everything in limbo, and it leaves the imagination's to go wild, and opens the door to suspicion and distrust among the population. Otherwise it's dividing the nation into groups, and once this happens it's hard to get the group's back together.

And you come back immediately with the lie that the courts didn’t hear the evidence. There was no evidence.

The courts heard the cases which Giuliani and the others presented. None of the cases filed involved “fraud” or “theft of the election”. Giuliani simply argued that votes should not count.

In court case after court case, Giuliani presented video supporting his claims that cases of Biden votes had but being pulled out and counted after poll watchers had been sent home.

Then state election officials came in and explained that as each shift ended, all ballots had to be returned to their boxes and put away, and then they they went home. Then the new shift of ballot counters and Paul watchers arrived at the counting Station, pulled out the boxes of ballots and proceeded with the count with the next shift of state workers and poll watchers.

Trump and Giuliani stood in front of television cameras and talked about theft and fraud in the election, but in court Giuliani said that they were not claims be of “fraud”.

Rudy Giuliani was recently suspended by the New York State Bar Association, for lying both in and out of court. He faces a similar suspension, and possible permanent disbarment in both states for lying in court and lying to the public about the nature of the cases he presented.

Sydney Powell is facing similar disciplinary actions for her part in deceiving the American people, and both Gulliani and Powell are facing a $1.3 billion dollar defamation suit by the manufacturer of Dominion voting machines.

Jenna Ellis, bless her heart, had the good sense not to put her name on or sign any documents filed in connection with any of these law suits, and thus escaped any legal consequences for her lies. She’s got a job with Newsmaxx, as a legal and religion contributor for the 2022 and 2024 elections. Lying to the public and in front of the cameras is one thing, but lying in writing on legal documents filed in a court of law is perjury.

While it appears that Ellis may have landed on her feet here, despite her lying to the cameras. It should be remembered that Newsmax is also facing a $1.3 billion lawsuit from the makers of Dominion voting machines and that may be enough to bankrupt the network and put for Jenna out of work.

So yes the courts have heard the cases and they have thrown all of them out. Trump lost. He lost the election. He has exhausted every legal recount and every appeal in every court all of the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

Trump made false and spurious claims to the courts that states didn’t follow their own election laws, and those claims were completely untrue.
Without actually going to trial in order that both sides present their evidence before the judge, a jury, and before the American public as witnesses to the charges and remedies, then we have no justice in this country. It matters not about all the shenanigans and back and forth, where as what ultimately matters is justice before the eyes of the American people. That didn't happen due to political reasons, and everyone knows it.

Anything that involves the people's business such as voter integrity, and charges made against an election should be heard, and then a court date set. No one is lying about anything, but rather everyone is wanting transparency instead of politics or corruption that hides the truth in these things. Without a transparent court trial that opens the windows to the allowing of both sides to have their day in court, then the American people have lost in the situation.

So what you’re saying is that Donald Trump should’ve been tried for conspiring with Russia. We cannot cannot possibly know the truth of whether or not Trump conspired with Russia because there never was a trial and nobody presented the evidence.

The public is entitled to a trial and that never happened so we can never know for sure whether Trump conspired with Russia without a trial.
 
These people are totally bat crap crazy.

Their "seven point plan" can never happen.

I don't know how these people became so delusional.

As many Republicans, conservatives, and others on the right have acknowledged themselves: this is about sowing mistrust and discord among the American people; it’s about compelling voters to lose confidence in the political process; and it’s about undermining our democratic institutions – all of which is perceived by rightist as benefiting Republican officeholders and candidates.

They don’t really believe the ridiculous misinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies they propagate – such as the election being ‘stolen’ or ‘reinstating’ Trump; it’s about making the political process so chaotic and toxic that it’s abandoned by most voters, thus establishing and maintaining Republican minority rule.

Consequently, they are not delusional or crazy – conservatives are participating in a collective misinformation campaign, and rhetoric about ‘reinstating’ Trump is part of that process.
All your words might be correct if the public wasn't first hand witnesses to the misconduct of the Democrat's for the last 4+ years now, so good luck with holding up your misinformation campaign forever.
What misconduct?

Not looking the other way to presidential grafting?
 
These people are totally bat crap crazy.

Their "seven point plan" can never happen.

I don't know how these people became so delusional.


Why would CPAC want a Russian asset in the White House? Very confusing...

View attachment 511561

In his new book, “American Kompromat,” Unger interviewed Yuri Shvets, who told him that the KGB manipulated Trump with simple flattery. “In terms of his personality, the guy is not a complicated cookie,” he said, “his most important characteristics being low intellect coupled with hyperinflated vanity. This makes him a dream for an experienced recruiter.”

An Ex-KGB Agent Says Trump Was a Russian Asset Since 1987.


Because CPAC, and the rest of the Trump Cult, believe that stories of Trump’s ties to Russia are all part of the “Russian Hoax”. No collusion. Total exoneration.

Bill Barr said so.
actually Mueller said so. Did you not read Vol 1 of the Mueller report?

No, Mueller did NOT say so.

Mueller said there was “insufficient evidence to prove conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt”. Mueller didn’t say there was “no evidence” of a conspiracy, nor did he exonerate Trump.

In his response to Barr’s Summary of his report, Mueller reiterated that he did NOT exonerate Trump at all.

It should also be remembered that Flynn, Stone and Manafort all continued to lie throughout the investigation and cover up their dealings with their Russian handlers during that time.

It would’ve been interesting to know the findings of the Mueller report in regards to conspiracy with the Russians, had Flynn, Manafort and Stone been honest in their dealings with investigators.
you obviously didn’t read vol 1…or hear his testimony. He clearly says there was no conspiracy

I quoted volume one. His testimony was basically mumbling one word answers he did not say definitively there was no conspiracy.

He did say that Trump is NOT exonerated. He also could not charge Trump if he found crimes, but could have exonerated Trump had he found no criminal conduct.

Barr said Trump was exonerated. Mueller denied emphatically that Trump was exonerated.

You just continue to repeat the same debunked lies that the Trump cult has been spouting since the beginning.
 
These people are totally bat crap crazy.
In all seriousness, my guess is that CPAC knows how gullible and conned the base is, and they're just keeping the fire lit for fundraising.

I don't believe, at least for now, that knowledgeable people higher up really believe any of this post-election madness.

CPAC used to hold one conference per year but now that they need the money, they’re holding two conferences this year because grifters gotta grift.

It is shocking to those of us who live outside the United States that your country allows a political group with the stated purpose of overthrowing the democratically elected government of the United States, to continue to promote lies, sedition, and White in any other country in the world would be called “treason”.

There seem to be no legal consequences for Republicans who continue to spread lies and propaganda in the wake of the 2020 election.
You say they are lie's, yet you can't prove them lie's because the court's haven't heard the case's, and refuse to hear the cases in which is a travesty of justice in regards to the American population. That has been one aspect of this thing, and it leaves everything in limbo, and it leaves the imagination's to go wild, and opens the door to suspicion and distrust among the population. Otherwise it's dividing the nation into groups, and once this happens it's hard to get the group's back together.

And you come back immediately with the lie that the courts didn’t hear the evidence. There was no evidence.

The courts heard the cases which Giuliani and the others presented. None of the cases filed involved “fraud” or “theft of the election”. Giuliani simply argued that votes should not count.

In court case after court case, Giuliani presented video supporting his claims that cases of Biden votes had but being pulled out and counted after poll watchers had been sent home.

Then state election officials came in and explained that as each shift ended, all ballots had to be returned to their boxes and put away, and then they they went home. Then the new shift of ballot counters and Paul watchers arrived at the counting Station, pulled out the boxes of ballots and proceeded with the count with the next shift of state workers and poll watchers.

Trump and Giuliani stood in front of television cameras and talked about theft and fraud in the election, but in court Giuliani said that they were not claims be of “fraud”.

Rudy Giuliani was recently suspended by the New York State Bar Association, for lying both in and out of court. He faces a similar suspension, and possible permanent disbarment in both states for lying in court and lying to the public about the nature of the cases he presented.

Sydney Powell is facing similar disciplinary actions for her part in deceiving the American people, and both Gulliani and Powell are facing a $1.3 billion dollar defamation suit by the manufacturer of Dominion voting machines.

Jenna Ellis, bless her heart, had the good sense not to put her name on or sign any documents filed in connection with any of these law suits, and thus escaped any legal consequences for her lies. She’s got a job with Newsmaxx, as a legal and religion contributor for the 2022 and 2024 elections. Lying to the public and in front of the cameras is one thing, but lying in writing on legal documents filed in a court of law is perjury.

While it appears that Ellis may have landed on her feet here, despite her lying to the cameras. It should be remembered that Newsmax is also facing a $1.3 billion lawsuit from the makers of Dominion voting machines and that may be enough to bankrupt the network and put for Jenna out of work.

So yes the courts have heard the cases and they have thrown all of them out. Trump lost. He lost the election. He has exhausted every legal recount and every appeal in every court all of the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

Trump made false and spurious claims to the courts that states didn’t follow their own election laws, and those claims were completely untrue.
Without actually going to trial in order that both sides present their evidence before the judge, a jury, and before the American public as witnesses to the charges and remedies, then we have no justice in this country. It matters not about all the shenanigans and back and forth, where as what ultimately matters is justice before the eyes of the American people. That didn't happen due to political reasons, and everyone knows it.

Anything that involves the people's business such as voter integrity, and charges made against an election should be heard, and then a court date set. No one is lying about anything, but rather everyone is wanting transparency instead of politics or corruption that hides the truth in these things. Without a transparent court trial that opens the windows to the allowing of both sides to have their day in court, then the American people have lost in the situation.

So what you’re saying is that Donald Trump should’ve been tried for conspiring with Russia. We cannot cannot possibly know the truth of whether or not Trump conspired with Russia because there never was a trial and nobody presented the evidence.

The public is entitled to a trial and that never happened so we can never know for sure whether Trump conspired with Russia without a trial.
That would have been just fine with me. Yes, go to trial when this bullcrap rises to a level that hurts this nation in ways that is unimaginable. I'm for anyone going before a grand jury if they are accused of crime's that rise to a level that warrant's such a situation. However, I am also ok with courts not hearing cases if the cases don't rise to the worthiness of the court, and therefore the court feels it a waste of time to move forward on a case not being proven properly.

In the case of Russia, Russia, Russia, yes a hearing was maybe warranted to clear the air finally. In the case of Hillary the same. In the case of Biden and Ukraine, a hearing should have definitely been scheduled to review that situation. It all should be vetted, and then the air cleared for the health and well being of the nation.
 
"We need your financial help to make this happen".
Donating to someone who exposes fraud is a good thing.

I guess that's why so many around him get busted.
Just proves a two sided justice system, because Democrat's get a pass while conservatives are attacked like animals in the wild by raving mad wolves. What a shame it all is, and no matter how hard the Democrat's try to hide their hand, they can't do it.
 
These people are totally bat crap crazy.

Their "seven point plan" can never happen.

I don't know how these people became so delusional.

They've been made crazy by the Democrat's who alledgedly did everything in their power to save their leftist agenda, and to use government power to SHOVE it down the American citizen's throat's. And they are doing so without so much as a tiny glass of water to help with the pain. It's a tough pill to swallow for the majority, but the minority Democrat's are hoping they can succeed with government help in their final push to transform the nation against the good citizen's will. Good luck with that.

The school boards are already feeling the heat because of the Americans will to save their children from it's horrid indoctrination, and it won't stop there.
It looks like the majority supports the leftist agenda or at least some of it because if they didn't Biden wouldn't be POTUS right now, would he?

The middle class is fed up with being screwed over by right wing Rpublican policies that have left them out in favor of the top 2%. That's why Biden is POTUS & Trump's ass was booted out.
 
"We need your financial help to make this happen".
Donating to someone who exposes fraud is a good thing.

I guess that's why so many around him get busted.
Just proves a two sided justice system, because Democrat's get a pass while conservatives are attacked like animals in the wild by raving mad wolves. What a shame it all is, and no matter how hard the Democrat's try to hide their hand, they can't do it.

People have protested over a two sided justice system and many now complaining dismissed their concerns.
 
These people are totally bat crap crazy.

Their "seven point plan" can never happen.

I don't know how these people became so delusional.


Why would CPAC want a Russian asset in the White House? Very confusing...

View attachment 511561

In his new book, “American Kompromat,” Unger interviewed Yuri Shvets, who told him that the KGB manipulated Trump with simple flattery. “In terms of his personality, the guy is not a complicated cookie,” he said, “his most important characteristics being low intellect coupled with hyperinflated vanity. This makes him a dream for an experienced recruiter.”

An Ex-KGB Agent Says Trump Was a Russian Asset Since 1987.


Because CPAC, and the rest of the Trump Cult, believe that stories of Trump’s ties to Russia are all part of the “Russian Hoax”. No collusion. Total exoneration.

Bill Barr said so.
actually Mueller said so. Did you not read Vol 1 of the Mueller report?

No, Mueller did NOT say so.

Mueller said there was “insufficient evidence to prove conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt”. Mueller didn’t say there was “no evidence” of a conspiracy, nor did he exonerate Trump.

In his response to Barr’s Summary of his report, Mueller reiterated that he did NOT exonerate Trump at all.

It should also be remembered that Flynn, Stone and Manafort all continued to lie throughout the investigation and cover up their dealings with their Russian handlers during that time.

It would’ve been interesting to know the findings of the Mueller report in regards to conspiracy with the Russians, had Flynn, Manafort and Stone been honest in their dealings with investigators.
you obviously didn’t read vol 1…or hear his testimony. He clearly says there was no conspiracy

I quoted volume one. His testimony was basically mumbling one word answers he did not say definitively there was no conspiracy.

He did say that Trump is NOT exonerated. He also could not charge Trump if he found crimes, but could have exonerated Trump had he found no criminal conduct.

Barr said Trump was exonerated. Mueller denied emphatically that Trump was exonerated.

You just continue to repeat the same debunked lies that the Trump cult has been spouting since the beginning.
You are quoting part of Vol 2....he didn't exonerate Trump of the allegations he investigated of obstruction in Vol 2, he left it up to his bosses and Congress...both of which found nothing to charge or impeach on, thus exonerating him

Vol 1, relates to the "collusion" "conspiracy" hoax


"Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

"In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.” In so doing, the Office recognized that the word “collud[e]” was used in communications with the Acting Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation’s scope and that the term has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law. In connection with that analysis, we addressed the factual question whether members of the Trump Campaign “coordinat[ed]”—a term that appears in the appointment order—with Russian election interference activities. Like collusion, “coordination” does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. We understood coordination to require an agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference. That requires more than the two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other’s actions or interests. We applied the term coordination in that sense when stating in the report that the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

Now moving on to his testimony: Robert Mueller's testimony before Congress: Full transcript

COLLINS:

Thank you. Is it true, the evidence gathered during your investigation -- given the questions that you've just answered, is it true the evidence gathered during your investigation did not establish that the president was involved in the underlying crime related to Russian election interference as stated in Volume 1, page 7?
MUELLER:

We found insufficient evidence of the president's culpability.
COLLINS:

So that would be a yes.
MUELLER:

Pardon?
COLLINS:

That would be a yes.

MUELLER:

Yes.

OLLINS:

Thank you. Isn't it true the evidence did not establish that the president or those close to him were involved in the charged (ph) Russian computer hacking or active measure conspiracies or that the president otherwise had unlawful relationships with any Russian official, Volume 2, page 76? Correct?
MUELLER:

I will leave the answer to our report.
COLLINS:

So that is a yes. Is that any (ph) true your investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with Russian government in election interference activity, Volume 1, page 2; Volume 1, page 173?
MUELLER:

Thank you. Yes.
 
They don’t really believe the ridiculous misinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies they propagate – such as the election being ‘stolen’ or ‘reinstating’ Trump; it’s about making the political process so chaotic and toxic that it’s abandoned by most voters, thus establishing and maintaining Republican minority rule.
There's at least one Michigan judge who agrees with you:

July 12, 2021

"Just how untethered from reality this argument is became clear today when U.S. District Judge Linda V. Parker held a hearing on whether the lawyers who tried to overturn the 2020 election results in Michigan should face sanctions.

"Those lawyers, dubbed the 'Kraken' by one of their leaders, Trump-affiliated lawyer Sidney Powell, produced close to 1000 pages of affidavits intending to cast doubt on the election results. Michigan and the city of Detroit filed complaints with the bar after the lawsuits failed, calling for punishment for the lawyers who had signed on to the effort.

"As today’s hearing proceeded, it became clear that the so-called Kraken lawyers had made no effort to verify much of anything they presented to the court.

"Repeatedly, Parker asked if anyone had tried to verify any of the affidavits they had filed; repeatedly, they indicated they had not.

"At one point, Parker said, 'I don't think I've ever really seen an affidavit" like this. "This is really fantastical,' Parker said. "How can any of you, as officers of the court, present this type of an affidavit?"

"Parker suggested that the whole point of the lawsuits in the first place was to spread lies to make people think the election wasn’t legitimate. 'My concern is that counsel here has submitted affidavits to suggest and make the public believe that there was something wrong with the election...'"
 

Forum List

Back
Top