LeftofLeft
Diamond Member
- Oct 18, 2011
- 26,238
- 16,659
- 1,405
Again, no argument there. But questioning the outcome of an election does not make one radical or far right.Pandering to MAGA in a Blue State makes him unelectable
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, no argument there. But questioning the outcome of an election does not make one radical or far right.Pandering to MAGA in a Blue State makes him unelectable
I highly doubt that. With food, clothing, and gas all doubling since the Biden presidency, with lower and middle classes struggling as they are, look for huge leftist losses this November.
When you do that broadly and with no proof it will make you far right in a state like Maryland.Again, no argument there. But questioning the outcome of an election does not make one radical or far right.
He won't win the primary.Of course you are, they stand between you and your vision of turning the world into P. T. Barnum’s circus sideshow.
Questioning the outcome of the election is gaslighting and pandering to reactionary right-wingers....especially when off the record, those same folks ADMIT there was no voter fraud....but you are saying you are ok with being lied to because it makes you feel better...Again, no argument there. But questioning the outcome of an election does not make one radical or far right.
We shall soon see. As fuel prices go - so does the cost of manufacturing and delivering goods. Under Trump, we were actually exporting oil. Russia's "special military operation" did spike oil prices. However, the so-called "green" policies of Democrats have rendered us ill prepared to stave off the inflation we are now living through.You got me there…
Republicans SHOULD win the Senate easily given a mid term election and a poor economy they can blame on Democrats
But then they run MAGA candidates like Walker and Mastriano and will rob victory with defeat in Georgia and Pennsylvania
Even though Mastriano is running for Governor, his extremism will draw the Democratic vote and doom Oz
In 2000, 2004, and 2016 there were electric Democrats who claimed those lost elections to be stolen or cheated. Based on your criteria, they were nut jobs.When you do that broadly and with no proof it will make you far right in a state like Maryland.
When you question one election with definable proof, you are not a radical. When you claim all elections that you lose to be stolen, it makes you a nut job
Everything you are siting is Opinion. Go look at the NY Post article. At the top of the page it says Opinion. They are not trying to present Opinion as News or fact. Big difference.Questioning the outcome of the election is gaslighting and pandering to reactionary right-wingers....especially when off the record, those same folks ADMIT there was no voter fraud....but you are saying you are ok with being lied to because it makes you feel better...
Now back to you clutching your pearls over Cox being labeled far right because he is pushes the Big Lie -- are you saying that is a mainstream position now? Cool...
I notice you avoided Biden being called the most radical leftist president in US history by the media..why did you avoid that?? Still trying to figure out how to move the goal posts with that one??
![]()
Biden is the most radical left-wing president in US history, period
Joe Biden is off to the most left-wing start of any Democratic president in recent memory. Just two weeks later, the dulcet tones of Biden’s inaugural address already seem an artifact of a by…nypost.com
And here is the article you dodged...let me guess, it isn't the "mainstream media" enough for you??
![]()
Obama is a leftist radical
For that we need to look beyond his campaign rhetoric to some of the people and...www.newstimes.com
"Obama is a disciple of Saul Alinsky, another anti-American radical who developed the role of "community organizer," and authored the book "Rules for Radicals," whom he dedicated to Lucifer, "the very first radical." As a "community organizer" Obama became very proficient at following Alinsky's rules for using deception to gain power."
That is word for word what right-wingers said about Obama his whole 8 years.....why? Because they must lie about their opponent's position because their own policies suck......but you are whining about media calling some candidate far right -- why are you so upset about that?? Every candidate you morons nominated that lost; your main complaint about them was that they aren't far right enough...you folks have not rejected anyone for being too far right...the only time you criticize someone is when you think they are a "RINO" not because they are "far right"
In 2000, 2004, and 2016 there were electric Democrats who claimed those lost elections to be stolen or cheated. Based on your criteria, they were nut jobs.
He won't win the general.He already has....
Cox doesn’t have a chance in MarylandHe won't win the general.
Hogan was able to win in Maryland because of his family history and moderate positionsI tend to agree. All the high-population counties that surround DC will vote what their government paychecks tell them - no matter the state of the economy.
Obama is simply a queer deviant who hates his own whiteness, the liberty provided to the average everyday American and he loves his tranny wife's ideology of hate ****** too.But Obama is a radical leftist Muslim terrorist Buddhist Marxist tho right?
Remember when you idiots said that??
You clowns are masters at calling any candidate with a D by their name radical, far left, blah blah...you morons called Biden far left...so spare me.....
^ I rest my case ^Obama is simply a queer deviant who hates his own whiteness, the liberty provided to the average everyday American and he loves his tranny wife's ideology of hate ****** too.
View attachment 672331
Isn't Cox running to get a government paycheck??I tend to agree. All the high-population counties that surround DC will vote what their government paychecks tell them - no matter the state of the economy.
What were the specific grievances in 2000 and 2004? Those align with the specific grievances in 2020 in the contestable states. I don’t argue the difference in 2020 trying to overturn the election but my point was just about “questioning” the results of the election. I have questions about 2020 but accepted it and moved on. Another big difference.2000 and 2004 were about specific states. Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004. There were specific, identifiable grievances.
2016 had identifiable Russian interference in the election. While Dems claimed it validated the integrity of the results, they never sought to overturn the results
2020 was an assault on our Democracy by a Crybaby Loser who could not admit he lost