The very first vaccines for COVID-19 to complete
phase 3 testing are an entirely new type:
mRNA vaccines.
Never before have
mRNA vaccines ...
been approved for use in any disease.
Learn how mRNA vaccines trigger an immune response against COVID-19.
www.cdc.gov
New Approach to Vaccines
mRNA vaccines are a new type of vaccine to protect against infectious diseases. To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies.
Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, they teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies. That immune response, which produces antibodies, is what protects us from getting infected if the real virus enters our bodies.
I linked where I got that information. It's a site that is PRO vaccination.
I just want to make sure that it's absolutely without question understood that this is NEW, never been used on a mass scale.
It changes your cells to make it make a protien that it doesn't need, that looks like Covid.
Just say "Yes. I understand that." That's all.
Great post. But another thing to consider is that these aren't even vaccines also:
Since mRNA therapies do not render the immunized person immune, and do not inhibit transmission of the virus, they cannot qualify as a public health measure capable of providing collective benefit that supersedes individual risk, and therefore cannot be mandated.
Marketing mRNA Therapy as Vaccine Violates Federal Law
Since mRNA "vaccines" do not meet the medical and/or legal definition of a vaccine, referring to them as vaccines, and
marketing them as such, is a deceptive practice that violates9 15 U.S. Code Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission Act,10 the law that governs advertising of medical practices.
The lack of completed human trials also puts these mRNA products at odds with 15 U.S. Code Section 41. Per this law,11,12 it is unlawful to advertise "that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made."
Here's the problem: The primary end point in the COVID-19 "vaccine" trials is not an actual vaccine trial end point because, again, vaccine trial end points have to do with immunity and transmission reduction. Neither of those was measured.
What's more, key secondary end points in Moderna's trial include prevention of severe COVID-19 disease (defined as need for hospitalization) and prevention of infection by SARS-CoV-2, regardless of symptoms.13,14 However, Moderna did not actually measure rate of infection, stating that it was too "impractical" to do so.
That means there's no evidence of this gene therapy having an impact on infection, for better or worse. And, if you have no evidence, you cannot fulfill the U.S. Code requirement that states you must have "competent and reliable scientific evidence … substantiating that the claims are true."
Making matters worse, both Pfizer and Moderna are now eliminating their control groups by offering the real vaccine to any and all placebo recipients who want it.15 The studies are supposed to go on for a full two years, but by eliminating the control group, determining effectiveness and risks is going to be near impossible.
Read full article:
As calls for mandatory COVID-19 vaccination increase globally, it's now more imperative to understand what these injections are. Learn more here.
articles.mercola.com
