COVID-19’s Biological Politics

@20 h, Fenton is told that...."We regret to inform you that your manuscript is inappropriate for posting."
'....Following rejection without explanation by preprint server @arxiv our paper exposing anomalies in the ONS vaxx mortality data has now also been rejected by preprint server @MedArXiv. Manuscript title: "What the ONS Mortality COVID-19 Surveillance Data Can Tell Us About Vaccine Safety and Efficacy.'
 
From Flutrackers, a cruise ship with 800 C-19 patients:

11 Nov 2022 Australia - Majestic Princess Cruise with 800 COVID-19 Patients Set to Dock in Sydney
 
It looks like Pfizer over Moderna, though these people don't have both oars in the water. Regardless of rarity, the diversity of particularizations in each patient (the uniqueness of each genome) should prompt inquiry of the difference between the two vaccines, which is not rigorously scrutinized, but left esoteric in this report. By default, it should lead to questions of the spike protein: "Is the R in either Pfizer or Moderna a CGG CGG, or is it different from SARS-CoV-2 CGG CGG? (See post 1,337)

'....[This study] should help put to rest 'vaccine hesitancy'....'
 
Because the Twitter prompt interferes with our search history, we are currently unable to specifically point to the places where we see Dalgleish and Sorensen mentioned on Rixey's page. If USMB has not yet learned who Sorensen and Dalgleish are, there is a keyword search.

In addition, we can see that Rixey looks at pertinent points and asks questions, though still does not seem to know the RGD connection to tropism, which tropism he does mention for the SARS-CoV-2 spike. Thus he wonders why they would use lipid nanoparticles when the spike alone has sufficient tropism. Rixey also mentions Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, but has yet to make the RGD (tropism) link to Parkinson's as well.

But Rixey's page is key to understanding Fau Chi's freudian slip in his video for SARS-CoV-2 mutation, D614G.
 
On this thread, we have asked, due to its tropism, if the RGD motif stays in the vaccines. Rixey gets close to the RGD motif we have already shown for SARS-CoV-2 at positions 403-405:

'.....Why would you keep the 364-390 section - The Furin Cleavage Site - in a vax? You would'nt.'
 
On this thread, we have asked, due to its tropism, if the RGD motif stays in the vaccines. Rixey gets close to the RGD motif we have already shown for SARS-CoV-2 at positions 403-405:

'.....Why would you keep the 364-390 section - The Furin Cleavage Site - in a vax? You would'nt.'

One can click (several times if need be) on the image of the sequences and see the RGD motif on Rixey's page at position 403-405. The arginine (R) is in blue. Does it stay in the vax or not?
 
What Rixey says above, " stabilized the 'native.' pre-fusion, uncleaved Spike," links to the only, undoubtedly vaccine-linked mutation we've yet seen for SARS-CoV-2: Omicron N969K of the HR1 region. This heptad repeat region is stabilized for vaccine production.
 
In Myth of the Blind Watchmaker, Rixey points to a colleague: 'An unofficial companion article by Arkmedic from 4/10/2022 is highly relevant.'

Arkmedic says of the HIV inserts: 'And there we have it. 3 gene sequences. None of them exist in viruses. One of them doesn't exist in nature at all.'

Arkmedic is the second one we notice that doesn't mention the exact match with SARS-CoV-2: the uncultured marine virus we mentioned in 2021. Demaneuf does not mention it:

Post # 1,268

The report that does mention it is from the University of Michigan:

Post #531

As readers can see, the uncultured virus sequence is identical to SARS-CoV-2 sequence.
 
Post #1,268
 
Arkmedia also rants about the pangolins and bats and their distance from humans, though Baric's bat coronavirus, RsSHC014, linked to Daszak in 2011, came from the edge of an expressway on the outskirts of Kunming.
 
Fake Pangolins in the News:

'@3h: Gof virologists are burning down one prestigious science journal after another! Nature medicine, lancet, science, now PNAS!, and whatever other journals published fake pangolin studies.'
 
Russia in the News

'@elonmusk: Leave it to the Russians to help explain Ralph Baric's synthetic coronavirus system.'
 
Quay's page has been noted on this thread, which shows RGDP sequence just before deletions. We have also mentioned the RGD sequence in HCov-229E, both linking to Supotnitskiy's passage (post # 1,356):

'Using MAXHOM algorithm used to align putative S1-S2 junction region of the S-glycoprotein coronaviruses, KE Follis (University of Montana, Missoula, 2006) found remnants of a furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV, HCov-229E, and NL-63 glycoproteins that disappeared as a result of spontaneous deletions. A once-existing protease-responsive site was signaled by a single arginine (R) at position 667 of the SARS-CoV S glycoprotein.'
 
At least they are naming the mutations for deer-to-human transmission, but coyly do not mention Moderna vaccine, which lost out to Pfizer:

'....These results suggest that white-tailed deer S-gene mutations do not have substantial antigenic impact on antigenicity....two doses or three of BNT162b2....'
 
We point back to post # 1,333 (Dr. McCullough's kidney information) with this interesting kidney/remdesivir thread:

 
If the twitter login prompt appears, click on it, then click on the 'x' of the next page to eliminate it, until such time as it may appear again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top