Court upholds a persons right to legally resist an illegal arrest.

[mudwhistle]

They will stand by and let some hood rat steal shit out of someone's car or out of a store...but they want to site you for dropping ashes on the sidewalk.

 

[progressive hunter]

Thus the fact that they're a bunch of jerk-offs that normally wouldn't be hired to guard a 7/11.

who the hippies or exbikers??

 

[JusticeHammer]

Sure, but the courts are saying the same about law enforcement.

The courts are heavily left biased.

 

[mudwhistle]

who the hippies or exbikers??

No....the beta boys with nipple rings.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The officers had argued that they should be held harmless; they noted that it was a magistrate who actually issued the arrest warrant, albeit at the request of one of the deputies. And they said they were entitled to qualified immunity, which protects law enforcement officers from a wide swath of legal liability.

Ellis, though, said that “qualified immunity is not for blunders,” and ruled as a matter of law that the deputies violated Souter's rights.

Very good.