Court of International Trade puts Trump tariffs on hold

[excalibur]

Meanwhile, all the nations coming to the table and signing agreements with us, very favorable agreements to us, and the leftoids cheer losing that.

We already know that you leftoids hate America, this proves it further, as if any further proof were needed.

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

One of the judges was appointed by Trump, gomer.

Seems to be a pattern....Trump is too ******* crazy even for his own judges.

 

[Unkotare]

I've said all I'm going to say.
...

You keep saying that, but you keep on saying.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You keep saying that, but you keep on saying.

Yeah, about that. I keep thinking of more to say.

It would be a waste to leave it unsaid.

Also... I have a bad habit of not unfollowing threads.

 

[TemplarKormac]

One of the judges was appointed by Trump, gomer.

Seems to be a pattern....Trump is too ******* crazy even for his own judges.

Doesn't matter who appointed whom. The law runs against them.

 

[Unkotare]

Yeah, about that. I keep thinking of more to say.

It would be a waste to leave it unsaid.
...

Not so much.

 

[IM2]

You really need to stop posting tweets as if they are fact.

Because just naming acts doesn't prove anything, junior.

The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and the Trade Act of 1974 continued this trend, adding provisions like Section 232 and Section 301, which allowed the President to impose tariffs in response to national security threats or unfair trade practices. However, these powers were still subject to specific findings and justifications, ensuring that executive actions were neither arbitrary nor unrestricted.


Throughout these legislative changes, the Supreme Court’s insistence on the “intelligible principle” doctrine remained a cornerstone, mandating that any delegation of authority must come with clear guidelines to avoid unfettered presidential power.

Can the President Declare a Trade War?​

The President’s authority to impose tariffs operates within a framework designed to balance swift executive action with legislative oversight. Key provisions include:

• Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962: Enables the President to impose tariffs if imports threaten national security, following a thorough investigation.
• Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974: Allows the President to impose retaliatory tariffs to counteract unfair foreign trade practices.
• International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA): Grants the President authority to regulate commerce during national emergencies involving foreign threats, requiring a formal declaration.

Who Controls U.S. Tariffs? The Constitution vs. Presidential Power – usconstitution.net

www.usconstitution.net

The president cannot impose tariffs on his own whims arbitrarily. Period.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Doesn't matter who appointed whom. The law runs against them.

Wrong...for the reasons that several of us have already explained to your simple MAGA butt.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Not so much.

(scratches head)

I don't remember pissing in your Wheaties this morning, mister.

 

[Care4all]

This is or could be the out the President needs...his worldwide tariff plan has been topsy turvy, chaos, market disrupting, and small business crushing.

If this summary judgement stands up on appeal, then Trump can blame activist judges and still be able to make the claim that his tariffs would have worked, but he was stopped... kind of thing that has him written all over it...imo.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Wrong...for the reasons that several of us have already explained to your simple MAGA butt.

I've cited all the laws that grant him the power.

But the cult of resistance has a hold on that shiveled brain of yours.

 

[IM2]

And how do Trump's tariffs meet the conditions in these laws, simp?

They do not....no matter how much you cry about it.

Blanket tariffs for no reason other than Trump is ******* crazy and plays with his own feces is not a legitimate reason for him to implement his tariffs.

The young boy thinks that he's besting me in some kind of contest he's created in his mind.

 

[Marener]

The leftists here can get bent.

• Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232), allows the President to impose tariffs or other trade restrictions for national security reasons.
• Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301), permits the President to impose tariffs to address unfair trade practices by foreign nations.
• International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977, grants the President authority to impose tariffs during national emergencies.

Did you read the decision?

 

[excalibur]

The courts don't seem interested in protecting Americas national security.

Nor do the leftoids. They're celebrating, in spite of all the success Trump has had to date, negotiating successful deals with more to come.

No such deals can be reached if a President needs Congress involved in every negotiation with every nation.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

The young boy thinks that he's besting me in some kind of contest he's created in his mind.

He's got serious problems.....total MAGA gomer.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

I've cited all the laws that grant him the power.

But the cult of resistance has a hold on that shiveled brain of yours.

The laws don't do what you say, simp.

Sorry...it saddens me tremendously to have to explain that to you.

 

[IM2]

I've cited all the laws that grant him the power.

But the cult of resistance has a hold on that shiveled brain of yours.

You didn't cite the laws, you cited the titles. I cited the conditions whereby Trump can impose tariffs, and what Trump is doing meets none of the conditions; therefore, the courts issued a summary judgment and ended his tariffs.

 

[Unkotare]

(scratches head)

I don't remember pissing in your Wheaties this morning, mister.

I don't eat cereal.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Did you read the decision?

I did.

All Trump needs to do is move most of his tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.

That eliminates the substance of this ruling.