Court of International Trade puts Trump tariffs on hold

[WEATHER53]

Which nation applied to the International Court for a ruling??
The answer is None
They acted preemptively of their own accord. Not their function nor legal

 

[Edgetho]

See?

Now what do you have to say for yourselves now, huh?

dimocraps ^^

 

[Edgetho]

Which nation applied to the International Court for a ruling??
The answer is None
They acted preemptively of their own accord. Not their function nor legal

The dimocrap scum party led the charge against America. As usual. It was a coalition of dimocrap scum Attorneys General and dimocrap scum-led States.

 

[TemplarKormac]

By the way, Goldman Sachs told CNBC the same thing we did last night, that Trump has a whole host of other laws he can use to maintain the tariffs.

They aren't going anywhere.

 

[kyzr]

Which nation applied to the International Court for a ruling??
The answer is None
They acted preemptively of their own accord. Not their function nor legal

Actually several small businesses filed suit that their businesses would be ruined by tariffs.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Now the leftist posts celebrating last night will be preserved for posterity. Can't delete it now!

This is what happens when you celebrate too soon. Textbook case.

 

[The Duke]

Tell you what....

You study for a few years, gain a few decades in the law profession and eventually become a Federal Judge...

Then we might have to hear what your opinion is on the law... Until that we are leaving it to the professionals...

Tariffs are a tax and Congress does taxes..

Annnnd..ta-da!

Appeals court reinstates Trump's tariffs for now after ruling blocking them

Federal court determined that President Trump doesn't have the authority to unilaterally impose tariffs, dealing a sweeping blow to his main weapon in his trade war.

abcnews.go.com

It's all over now, cupcake.

 

[WEATHER53]

The dimocrap scum party led the charge against America. As usual. It was a coalition of dimocrap scum Attorneys General and dimocrap scum-led States.

No international trade entity

 

[The Duke]

This is like hitting the Democrat offensive with a Howitzer.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Furthermore, if SCOTUS rules he can't use the IEEPA, he can easily shift to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 or Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962.

Barking up the wrong tree as per usual.

 

[The Duke]

You know what it does mean? That it was ******* legal. Unlike Trump's illegal activity to circumvent the legislature.

They ceded that duty to the president decades ago, goobersmoocher.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Now, if the textualists on SCOTUS rule like I think they might,

It could be 5-4 or 6-3 against Trump using the IEEPA. So, leftists will celebrate even then, until they realize what other laws Trump has at his disposal.

What they fail to realize is that SCOTUS will not rule on whether the President has the power to implement the tariffs, but on rather if the usage of the law was proper, big difference.

 

[Edgetho]

Actually several small businesses filed suit that their businesses would be ruined by tariffs.

That's who the DISGUSTING FILTH is trying to push as their Working Class Heroes. I don't know if they'd even have standing. It was Gavin Newscum and several dimocrap scum Attorneys General with the power to push it.

AI Overview
Learn more

The tariff lawsuit involved 12 states: Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Vermont. These states, along with their Democratic attorneys general, filed suit in the U.S. Court of International Trade to challenge President Trump's executive orders that imposed tariffs on various imports

 

[The Duke]

Now, if the textualists on SCOTUS rule like I think they might,

It could be 5-4 or 6-3 against Trump using the IEEPA. So, leftists will celebrate even then, until they realize what other laws Trump has at his disposal.

What they fail to realize is that SCOTUS will not rule on whether the President has the power to implement the tariffs, but on rather if the usage of the law was proper, big difference.

You know what I know? I know there's a lot of assholes out there not doing good things fer muh 'Muricans.
Da fuq is wrong with these people? They're here with us, they may think they're different, but they're really not.
They're not really helping themselves or future generations.

 

[TemplarKormac]

"Weeping may endure for a night, but glory cometh in the morning."

Psalm 30:5

 

[Edgetho]

They ceded that duty to the president decades ago, goobersmoocher.

They almost had to. Legislatures and Courts can take Months and YEARS to stop their squabbling and get off their asses.

A single Executive can respond to unfair Tariffs and Trade Practices in minutes, long before Congress has even figured where their parking spots are.

Yes, we'd all like for the deliberative process to be more present in our dealings but the other side won't cooperate.

 

[BluesLegend]

Now the leftist posts celebrating last night will be preserved for posterity. Can't delete it now!

This is what happens when you celebrate too soon. Textbook case.

Trump punched Dems in the dick again, poor things.

 

[Edgetho]

You know what I know? I know there's a lot of assholes out there not doing good things fer muh 'Muricans.
Da fuq is wrong with these people? They're here with us, they may think they're different, but they're really not.

Sorry to disagree with you, but they ARE different. They're scum for starters. Full of hate. They mostly hate life for making them the inferior pieces of shit they are so they also hate anybody enjoying life. They don't want us to. They don't, why should we?

Anything else I can do for you today?

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Aaaaaaand Trump already won on appeal.

 

[JLW]

Funny how the market skyrocketed on news that Trump exceeded his Constitutional authority in enacting his tariffs and how red MAGA are all in a fit that Trump can not exercise his control over free enterprises.

The district court is right. The president has engaged in ultra vires action regarding the imposition of his tariffs against nearly every country of the world (except Russia) and in clear violation of the IEEPA. The appeals court has temporarily stayed the DC's decision, but the DC's rationale was right on the money. If Trump wants to impose a blanket tariff, he needs Congressional approval, as opposed to the excuse that there is some kind of "national emergency" to come under the IEEPA.

If Trump said there was a "national emergency" against China, that would fly; but, against countries like Botswana, Cameroon and the Virgin Islands, it is pure unadulterated bullshit.