CDZ Could (actual) Conservatives support this kind of single payer?

WTF are you talking about? All I said was that there are lots of example of what you're talking about. I see no point in listing them all.
Right! That's not where you want the conversation to go. You know that it's just heading into a box canyon. Pretty much the same as Flash did when I told him that Canadians get some HC from big tech companies for 1/10 the cost Americans pay.

In Canada the 'socialist' wolves got in the doors of the big tech companies and there's no way of getting them out.
 
Which other tune do you imagine I will whistle?

Yeah. You seem to be missing the point.


The point being that the new technology diagnostic and treatment equipment didn't make itself and if we want it then we are going to have to pay for it.

Like Heinlein said "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch".
 
The point being that the new technology diagnostic and treatment equipment didn't make itself and if we want it then we are going to have to pay for it.
Uh, ok. Not sure what that has to do with anything, but I agree.
 
It wasn't luck. It was working hard.
That's probably quite true.
And next you will tell me that if everybody worked hard then they would have no trouble paying $100,000 or more.
So really pal, where's the problem?

The rubber just met the road!

You don't want answers, your ideology can't accept any answers. Your personal issue is claimed by you to not have been an issue and so you have zero interest in anybody else's plight.

Let me put it in American terms for you: If they can't afford $100,000 then they're lazy. Have I got that pretty much right?

p.s. 1/10 of the price, LOL
 
The point being that the new technology diagnostic and treatment equipment didn't make itself and if we want it then we are going to have to pay for it.

Like Heinlein said "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch".
I have a way of getting the lunch to you at 1/10 the price!
LOL

It's a steak sandwich instead of a big mac.
 
Yes, cost sharing is a great example! Everybody shares in the cost of HC for all the American people.

That's the group insurance concept that gives employers a lower price for insurance.
Both your suggestion and insurance companies 'dictate' prices. The difference is that your suggestion dictates fairer or lower prices.

Canada's universal HC is really just 'group' insurance on a large scale. The bigger the 'group', the better the price.
The big difference, however, lies in whether they are voluntary or not. Socialized medicine is forced on all.
 
I completely understand what you want because I have what you want.

In fact, the world's plans force doctors to perform more cost efficiently. One example of many is requiring a doctor to use a simple X-ray when the MRI isn't necessary. There are many more examples but that should serve to introduce the principle idea.

The downside is that some doctors run from Canada to the US. But do consider that the US currently gives them a place to run to. At the American people's expense of course.

Private HC will go to huge expense to keep the socialist wolves away from their doors.

The rest of the world took the side of the wolves.

Dude, the entire country of Canada has about the same population as California. Yes, that makes a huge difference.
 
The point being that the new technology diagnostic and treatment equipment didn't make itself and if we want it then we are going to have to pay for it.

Like Heinlein said "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch".

Wait a minute. Healthcare is the ONLY industry where technology allows lower costs. MRI's have been around for a long time now. But the cost of one just keeps going up and up.
 
Dude, the entire country of Canada has about the same population as California. Yes, that makes a huge difference.
So you're suggesting that what works in Canada can't work in a country with 330 million.
I would say that the bigger the population (the group), the easier it is to make it work. That's the principle of 'group' insurance.
Do you think 'group' insurance applies to your questions?
 
A regular physical exam might run to $200. That's $800 a year for a family of four. Try this, contact your doctor and offer him $600 cash every year to do physicals for a family of four. No insurance companies to wrangle, no co-pays to collect. You could probably get the deal and be able to cut hundreds off your insurance plan.

That's fine and dandy.
What about when you go into the hospital with Covid. Or your son breaks an arm. Or your wife comes down with pneumonia? It's not "IF" you need healthcare. It's when.
 
Your HC system is so far completely safe from the socialist wolves at the door.

Yes, greed is a huge factor.

Is the cost of pharmaceuticals negotiable? Can those big companies supply it to the people at 1/10 the price is some instances?

1/10th of who's cost? The citizens? Or the governments? It still costs. And "we the people" still pay for it.

I heard Biden reversed something that Trump initiated that kept the cost of insulin down.
 
That's fine and dandy.
What about when you go into the hospital with Covid. Or your son breaks an arm. Or your wife comes down with pneumonia? It's not "IF" you need healthcare. It's when.
That's what low premium catastrophic care plans with high deductibles are for.
 
Wait a minute. Healthcare is the ONLY industry where technology allows lower costs. MRI's have been around for a long time now. But the cost of one just keeps going up and up.
I suspect the MRI that you have at your local diagnostic center is probably much better than the technology of 20 years ago.

However, to put things in perspective the technology of vehicles have increased significantly in the last couple of decades and they are now more expensive.

The point I was making is that improved technology and accessibility to that techology have helped to increase cost of health care.

However, government destruction of the free market takes the cake.
 
I suspect the MRI that you have at your local diagnostic center is probably much better than the technology of 20 years ago.

However, to put things in perspective the technology of vehicles have increased significantly in the last couple of decades and they are now more expensive.

The point I was making is that improved technology and accessibility to that techology have helped to increase cost of health care.

However, government destruction of the free market takes the cake.

A lot of the price increases can't be attributed to the value of the USD. The car industry also equates the cost of the union employee's, their health insurance and other benefits.

Although there is a shortage in the stuff to make processors. If the car manufacturers would stop putting sensors that tell you when your window is down, maybe the costs would come down.
 
1/10th of who's cost? The citizens? Or the governments? It still costs. And "we the people" still pay for it.
The cost of the pharmaceuticals to the people obviously. Canadians get some at 1/10 the cost to Americans because it's negotiated. You got yourself barking up the wrong tree that time Truly.
I heard Biden reversed something that Trump initiated that kept the cost of insulin down.
I didn't but if it's true then there would be no doubt that Trump should be roundly praised for it.
 
The cost of the pharmaceuticals to the people obviously. Canadians get some at 1/10 the cost to Americans because it's negotiated. You got yourself barking up the wrong tree that time Truly.

I didn't but if it's true then there would be no doubt that Trump should be roundly praised for it.
Also because Canadian drug companies don't have to cover the cost of development and marketing. It costs a LOT to bring a new drug to market, costs that need to be recovered.
 
Also because Canadian drug companies don't have to cover the cost of development and marketing. It costs a LOT to bring a new drug to market, costs that need to be recovered.
Where did you get that idea? Of course Canadian shareholders pay the same as US shareholders

The reason is that your congress isn't permitted to negotiate prices.
 

Forum List

Back
Top