depotoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 9, 2012
- 40,719
- 13,425
- 2,280
With less than a fourth* of the population of the US.Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With less than a fourth* of the population of the US.Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.
Irrelevant right now, as the spread has just begun. How are you people not getting this? The virus was not sprinkled evenly over the two countries from outer space. It has to travel over time and space to infect people.With less than a third of the population of the US.
That's right. But it is far from over. I monitored the numbers, and your president's rhetoric. When he blamed the virus on europe, and banned Europeans, but not the UK and Ireland, he sure liked the US numbers.With less than a third of the population of the US.Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.
I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.
63%?
You better check your math there, Pythagoras
The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.
Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.
The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?
Our first case was Jan 21, theirs was Jan 28.Irrelevant right now, as the spread has just begun. How are you people not getting this? The virus was not sprinkled evenly over the two countries from outer space. It has to travel over time and space to infect people.With less than a third of the population of the US.
And what happened in between?Our first case was Jan 21, theirs was Jan 28.Irrelevant right now, as the spread has just begun. How are you people not getting this? The virus was not sprinkled evenly over the two countries from outer space. It has to travel over time and space to infect people.With less than a third of the population of the US.
I hear that.I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.
63%?
You better check your math there, Pythagoras
The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.
Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.
The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?
No idea where you're coming up with your numbers. 308 deaths out of 25,471 cases in the US. That comes out to 1.2% no matter how you do the math.
Microsoft Bing COVID-19 Tracker
Unless you're using common core math, which explains alot.
Tot Cases/That's right. But it is far from over. I monitored the numbers, and your president's rhetoric. When he blamed the virus on europe, and banned Europeans, but not the UK and Ireland, he sure liked the US numbers.With less than a third of the population of the US.Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.
Then some testing started, lol.
Numbers that will not cause mass panic when we know they will drop waaaayyyyy down.And it’s disgraceful to even repeat it.You are intelligent enough to know that at this point in the starting wave, this number is completely without merit.The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.
Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.
The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?
Dafuk does that even mean? You want the numbers buried?
Look, it was the OP who took the initiative to gurgle up bogus numbers. I corrected them. EVEN THEN with the caveat that the number was at present meaningless. What the fuck do you want here? Fake numbers?
So why repeat it if it isn’t realistic?Numbers that will not cause mass panic when we know they will drop waaaayyyyy down.And it’s disgraceful to even repeat it.You are intelligent enough to know that at this point in the starting wave, this number is completely without merit.The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?
Dafuk does that even mean? You want the numbers buried?
Look, it was the OP who took the initiative to gurgle up bogus numbers. I corrected them. EVEN THEN with the caveat that the number was at present meaningless. What the fuck do you want here? Fake numbers?
Read much? EVERY SINGLE TIME I've quoted that number --- ALWAYS in response to some wag putting up fake numbers --- I've done so with the notation that it isn't realistic, because it can't be realistic, because TIME. Not enough has gone by to establish it. With a 24-day incubation period the number who will recover is Not Yet Recorded.
You want a realistic number? THERE AREN'T ANY. But if some wag keeps repeating bogus ones, they're going to be corrected.
A better estimation of a realistic number is, again, to consider the aggregate, that body of samples that has had time --- as also previously noted, that is at the moment 12%, and as noted at the same time, THAT TOO has to settle, with time. A still-better view can be ascertained by looking at China, the first country to deal with CV and therefore has had the most TIME, which has a CURRENT rate of just 4%. But that too is not yet settled as China, like everybody else still has active cases not yet resolved.
As I said at the beginning, flinging random numbers out and declaring "this is the mortality rate, full stop" is just irresponsible. Not only is it bogus math, it's pure speculation based on bogus math.
Right, so it makes sense that we would pace them in cases for quite a while, regardless of population size, all else being equal.Our first case was Jan 21, theirs was Jan 28.Irrelevant right now, as the spread has just begun. How are you people not getting this? The virus was not sprinkled evenly over the two countries from outer space. It has to travel over time and space to infect people.With less than a third of the population of the US.
Yeah. I know. You don't have to repeat that. But i will repeat that numbers are low if you do not test. Now that testing has ramped up, numbers ramp up. And the US numbers seems to be increasing significantly faster than the german numbers.Tot Cases/That's right. But it is far from over. I monitored the numbers, and your president's rhetoric. When he blamed the virus on europe, and banned Europeans, but not the UK and Ireland, he sure liked the US numbers.With less than a third of the population of the US.Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.
Then some testing started, lol.
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72
Irrelevant right now, as a direct comparison.. Stop that, you are being silly.Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72
I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.
63%?
You better check your math there, Pythagoras
The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.
Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.
The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?
No idea where you're coming up with your numbers. 308 deaths out of 25,471 cases in the US. That comes out to 1.2% no matter how you do the math.
Microsoft Bing COVID-19 Tracker
Unless you're using common core math, which explains alot.
Tot Cases/That's right. But it is far from over. I monitored the numbers, and your president's rhetoric. When he blamed the virus on europe, and banned Europeans, but not the UK and Ireland, he sure liked the US numbers.With less than a third of the population of the US.Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.
Then some testing started, lol.
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72
So why repeat it if it isn’t realistic?Numbers that will not cause mass panic when we know they will drop waaaayyyyy down.And it’s disgraceful to even repeat it.You are intelligent enough to know that at this point in the starting wave, this number is completely without merit.
Dafuk does that even mean? You want the numbers buried?
Look, it was the OP who took the initiative to gurgle up bogus numbers. I corrected them. EVEN THEN with the caveat that the number was at present meaningless. What the fuck do you want here? Fake numbers?
Read much? EVERY SINGLE TIME I've quoted that number --- ALWAYS in response to some wag putting up fake numbers --- I've done so with the notation that it isn't realistic, because it can't be realistic, because TIME. Not enough has gone by to establish it. With a 24-day incubation period the number who will recover is Not Yet Recorded.
You want a realistic number? THERE AREN'T ANY. But if some wag keeps repeating bogus ones, they're going to be corrected.
A better estimation of a realistic number is, again, to consider the aggregate, that body of samples that has had time --- as also previously noted, that is at the moment 12%, and as noted at the same time, THAT TOO has to settle, with time. A still-better view can be ascertained by looking at China, the first country to deal with CV and therefore has had the most TIME, which has a CURRENT rate of just 4%. But that too is not yet settled as China, like everybody else still has active cases not yet resolved.
As I said at the beginning, flinging random numbers out and declaring "this is the mortality rate, full stop" is just irresponsible. Not only is it bogus math, it's pure speculation based on bogus math.
How is it irrelevant? Our population is much larger than theirs is. We had the first case, before them, yet we sit much lower on infection rate at this point in time.Irrelevant right now, as a direct comparison.. Stop that, you are being silly.Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72
You opened yourself to this. As i said, consider the audience. They will home in on your fallacious number, but not on the initially posted fallacious number.So why repeat it if it isn’t realistic?Numbers that will not cause mass panic when we know they will drop waaaayyyyy down.And it’s disgraceful to even repeat it.
Dafuk does that even mean? You want the numbers buried?
Look, it was the OP who took the initiative to gurgle up bogus numbers. I corrected them. EVEN THEN with the caveat that the number was at present meaningless. What the fuck do you want here? Fake numbers?
Read much? EVERY SINGLE TIME I've quoted that number --- ALWAYS in response to some wag putting up fake numbers --- I've done so with the notation that it isn't realistic, because it can't be realistic, because TIME. Not enough has gone by to establish it. With a 24-day incubation period the number who will recover is Not Yet Recorded.
You want a realistic number? THERE AREN'T ANY. But if some wag keeps repeating bogus ones, they're going to be corrected.
A better estimation of a realistic number is, again, to consider the aggregate, that body of samples that has had time --- as also previously noted, that is at the moment 12%, and as noted at the same time, THAT TOO has to settle, with time. A still-better view can be ascertained by looking at China, the first country to deal with CV and therefore has had the most TIME, which has a CURRENT rate of just 4%. But that too is not yet settled as China, like everybody else still has active cases not yet resolved.
As I said at the beginning, flinging random numbers out and declaring "this is the mortality rate, full stop" is just irresponsible. Not only is it bogus math, it's pure speculation based on bogus math.
Once AGAIN ---- I DIDN'T BRING IT UP. The OP did. Go ahead, check posts 1 and 2.
Because it doesn't inform you on anything whatsoever. You do understand what the word "irrelevant" means, right?How is it irrelevant?
You opened yourself to this. As i said, consider the audience. They will home in on your fallacious number, but not on the initially posted fallacious number.So why repeat it if it isn’t realistic?Numbers that will not cause mass panic when we know they will drop waaaayyyyy down.Dafuk does that even mean? You want the numbers buried?
Look, it was the OP who took the initiative to gurgle up bogus numbers. I corrected them. EVEN THEN with the caveat that the number was at present meaningless. What the fuck do you want here? Fake numbers?
Read much? EVERY SINGLE TIME I've quoted that number --- ALWAYS in response to some wag putting up fake numbers --- I've done so with the notation that it isn't realistic, because it can't be realistic, because TIME. Not enough has gone by to establish it. With a 24-day incubation period the number who will recover is Not Yet Recorded.
You want a realistic number? THERE AREN'T ANY. But if some wag keeps repeating bogus ones, they're going to be corrected.
A better estimation of a realistic number is, again, to consider the aggregate, that body of samples that has had time --- as also previously noted, that is at the moment 12%, and as noted at the same time, THAT TOO has to settle, with time. A still-better view can be ascertained by looking at China, the first country to deal with CV and therefore has had the most TIME, which has a CURRENT rate of just 4%. But that too is not yet settled as China, like everybody else still has active cases not yet resolved.
As I said at the beginning, flinging random numbers out and declaring "this is the mortality rate, full stop" is just irresponsible. Not only is it bogus math, it's pure speculation based on bogus math.
Once AGAIN ---- I DIDN'T BRING IT UP. The OP did. Go ahead, check posts 1 and 2.