SavannahMann
Platinum Member
- Nov 16, 2016
- 14,540
- 6,830
- 365
Actually, I wouldnât mind that one damned bit. Now, I know, that isnât the answer you expect from me, when Iâve written so much about inexcusable police misconduct, and called the shooting of many by police outright murder. So why would I like it if the cops were like âDirty Harryâ?
First, Dirty Harry never once shot an unarmed person. Not one. Go back through his movies again. It was never a guy holding a wallet, or someone surrendering. Harry never once blew a hole in someone who was not a baddie. The worst he ever did was draw his pistol on a guy who wanted an autograph. Even then he didnât shoot and swear he was afeared for his life.
I could live with that standard. Roughly speaking, almost half of the police shootings would not happen if the Dirty Harry standard was used. Most of the time, Harry didnât fire first. He returned fire. Harry didnât shoot hostages, he shot past them to get the baddies. He hit the target he was shooting at.
Yes, I know. Movies are not real life. But the standards that Clint Eastwood used in his movies should be the standards in real life. Corrupt Cops were not ignored, they were pursued, and eventually dealt with. The baddies died, trying to kill Harry was their last mistake.
Harry was the modern embodiment of the Old West code that was the beginning of Clintâs career. The Spagetti Westerns. Where the man with no name was faster on the draw, and accurate with his shots.
Again, I know, it isnât real life. But the standard should be. Letâs say I am in town, doing my thing. A man approaches me, I donât get to shoot him just because. He has to present a clear danger to myself. I canât afford to make a mistake, and either draw my weapon, brandishing, or fire just because I am uncertain. I need to be certain.
Gene Kranz the Flight Director of NASA fame and legend is often quoted. We need to work the problem, and not make it worse by guessing.That is the root of our problems today. We allow guesses, wrong guesses, to be acceptable. The argument is that if the cop takes the chance, and waits, he could die. Well if the cop doesnât take the chance and doesnât wait, others die. How many corpses from your mistakes are too many? In Georgia, a study clearly showed that half of the police shootings were of people who unarmed, or shot in the back. Often both.
Harry shot a man in the back who was fleeing before. But he was armed. There was no doubt he was a bad guy, no he could be. Harry never said he didnât know. Harry never had a situation where there was any doubt. Harry didnât guess. Harry knew with certainty.
Taking your best guess is a desperation move, one you go with when you have no other option. Where there is no way to get more information, no way to refine the situation, or your understanding of it. Until you shoot, you have time, you have options, and you donât have to rush the situation.
Yeah, I could live with the cops being Dirty Harry in reality, instead of just fiction. The problem is that the cop lovers would not like it. They would not like the restraint that was shown. They would not like the intolerance of corruption that the Dirty Harry type cop would have. There would be right and wrong, and both would be clearly evident.
Daniel Shaver would be alive if the cop had been like Dirty Harry. But unfortunately for Shaverâs family. The cop wasnât like Dirty Harry. He was a trigger happy little twit who was looking forward to a kill. That is not Dirty Harry. That is not even Death Wish. That is Training day. Bad cops on a rampage. Those bad cops arenât stopped in time. Not before they slaughter an innocent. Then the system rushes in to defend that bad cop, because all cops stick together.
Dirty Harry did not do that. Not even once.
First, Dirty Harry never once shot an unarmed person. Not one. Go back through his movies again. It was never a guy holding a wallet, or someone surrendering. Harry never once blew a hole in someone who was not a baddie. The worst he ever did was draw his pistol on a guy who wanted an autograph. Even then he didnât shoot and swear he was afeared for his life.
I could live with that standard. Roughly speaking, almost half of the police shootings would not happen if the Dirty Harry standard was used. Most of the time, Harry didnât fire first. He returned fire. Harry didnât shoot hostages, he shot past them to get the baddies. He hit the target he was shooting at.
Yes, I know. Movies are not real life. But the standards that Clint Eastwood used in his movies should be the standards in real life. Corrupt Cops were not ignored, they were pursued, and eventually dealt with. The baddies died, trying to kill Harry was their last mistake.
Harry was the modern embodiment of the Old West code that was the beginning of Clintâs career. The Spagetti Westerns. Where the man with no name was faster on the draw, and accurate with his shots.
Again, I know, it isnât real life. But the standard should be. Letâs say I am in town, doing my thing. A man approaches me, I donât get to shoot him just because. He has to present a clear danger to myself. I canât afford to make a mistake, and either draw my weapon, brandishing, or fire just because I am uncertain. I need to be certain.
Gene Kranz the Flight Director of NASA fame and legend is often quoted. We need to work the problem, and not make it worse by guessing.That is the root of our problems today. We allow guesses, wrong guesses, to be acceptable. The argument is that if the cop takes the chance, and waits, he could die. Well if the cop doesnât take the chance and doesnât wait, others die. How many corpses from your mistakes are too many? In Georgia, a study clearly showed that half of the police shootings were of people who unarmed, or shot in the back. Often both.
Harry shot a man in the back who was fleeing before. But he was armed. There was no doubt he was a bad guy, no he could be. Harry never said he didnât know. Harry never had a situation where there was any doubt. Harry didnât guess. Harry knew with certainty.
Taking your best guess is a desperation move, one you go with when you have no other option. Where there is no way to get more information, no way to refine the situation, or your understanding of it. Until you shoot, you have time, you have options, and you donât have to rush the situation.
Yeah, I could live with the cops being Dirty Harry in reality, instead of just fiction. The problem is that the cop lovers would not like it. They would not like the restraint that was shown. They would not like the intolerance of corruption that the Dirty Harry type cop would have. There would be right and wrong, and both would be clearly evident.
Daniel Shaver would be alive if the cop had been like Dirty Harry. But unfortunately for Shaverâs family. The cop wasnât like Dirty Harry. He was a trigger happy little twit who was looking forward to a kill. That is not Dirty Harry. That is not even Death Wish. That is Training day. Bad cops on a rampage. Those bad cops arenât stopped in time. Not before they slaughter an innocent. Then the system rushes in to defend that bad cop, because all cops stick together.
Dirty Harry did not do that. Not even once.
