BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,698
- 26,891
- 2,615
Democrats preach democracy and how they love it...until they don't.Democrats hate democracy. Hence the stolen election and bastardizing of the law.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Democrats preach democracy and how they love it...until they don't.Democrats hate democracy. Hence the stolen election and bastardizing of the law.
Link?Being convicted of defrauding The United States is close enough.
Poor little commie, individual voters are the ones that sued. The cases should have been dismissed for lack of standing.
.
When was the last time a losing candidate for president tried to overturn an election using a slew of his barbarian follwers to stop Congress from certifying the results? Or by plotting to send a bunch of idiot fake electors to Congress?
Let's have it, CLOWN.
Wrong.
The birther suit was denied because the individual plaintiff was trying to over ride everyone else, and take a candidate OFF the ballot.
You need standing for that, since it impacts EVERYONE in a harmful way.
In this case, individual plaintiffs are trying to aid the voters and everyone else, by trying to ensure their candidate is ON the ballot.
See the difference?
Almost no one has standing to remove candidates.
Almost everyone has standing to add candidates.
Lack of standing like Trump's 63 voter fraud cases that got laughed out of federal courts?Poor little commie, individual voters are the ones that sued. The cases should have been dismissed for lack of standing.
.
No it's not. Read the constitution.
The electors meet in their respective states. They cast their ballots for President and Vice President separately. They then send the ballots sealed to the Congress. The joint session of Congress opens and counts the votes. If there are objections raised to any of the votes, then each house will consider those objections independently. The person with the most votes for President becomes the President elect, so long as she has achieved a majority of all votes. And the person with the most votes for Vice President becomes the Vice-President elect as long as they also achieve a majority. If the President-elect fails to quality then the duly elected Vice President becomes acting President until the President-elect qualifies, or until a President is elected.
The constitution clearly envisions the constitutional qualifications of a potential President to be analyzed after the votes are counted.
The topic is the CO case, and no I don't see a difference. It's trying to prevent voters from having Trump as a choice on their ballot.
.
Lack of standing like Trump's 63 voter fraud cases that got laughed out of federal courts?
Is this what you mean?
You are forgetting the Amendments.
Here is about the 12th Amendment.
Maybe you should read the 20th amendment.
I brought up the 12 amendment only because the section of the Constitution you quoted said the candidate with the most votes was president and the one with the second amount of votes was vice president.
You do read English, right skrewey?Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office.
Constitutionally speaking, Trump is toast.
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office. Section 1: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of...www.dailykos.com
Yep. The OFFICE of the Presidency. That makes him an OFFICER.
Now the Roberts court will be forced to rule for, or against the Constitution. If they rule against, then they are clearly saying the Presidency is not an office, AND saying they can inject themselves into the states decisions on federal elections.
Choose wisely John. The court won't always be conservative, and once it flips, your decision will have consequences.
Translation from Mrsjonesican to English:Fortunately for Trump, he has a Supreme Court dominated by corrupt, dishonest conservative ideologues who will once again ignore precedent and the Constitution.