Conservatives should support Assad-right?

[EdwardBaiamonte]

They believe in tradition and slow change-right? The English did better than the French because they proceeded to democracy slowly preserving the best of the past or what worked[ running water, banking, religion, etc] without a violent revolution that led to Napoleon. A revolution in Syria will likely result in someone worse than Assad( as it did in Egypt ,Iraq, Libya) according to basic conservative principals, especially given the cost of the revolution, yet conservatives are on board with bombing of the airfields.

But then our Founders discarded all this and started their own revolution against impossible odds.

 

[irosie91]

no

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

They believe in tradition and slow change-right? The English did better than the French because they proceeded to democracy slowly preserving the best of the past or what worked[ running water, banking, religion, etc] without a violent revolution that led to Napoleon. A revolution in Syria will likely result in someone worse than Assad according to basic conservative principals especially given the cost of the revolution yet conservatives are on board with bombing of the airfields.

But then our Founders discarded all this and started their own revolution against impossible odds.

They believe in tradition and slow change-right?

We shouldn't have pushed for the fall of the Evil Empire, because communism had become a tradition?

 

[Cellblock2429]

They believe in tradition and slow change-right? The English did better than the French because they proceeded to democracy slowly preserving the best of the past or what worked[ running water, banking, religion, etc] without a violent revolution that led to Napoleon. A revolution in Syria will likely result in someone worse than Assad according to basic conservative principals especially given the cost of the revolution yet conservatives are on board with bombing of the airfields.

But then our Founders discarded all this and started their own revolution against impossible odds.

/---- Ahhhh shut up woman. Your straw man arguments are stupid as shyt.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

They believe in tradition and slow change-right? The English did better than the French because they proceeded to democracy slowly preserving the best of the past or what worked[ running water, banking, religion, etc] without a violent revolution that led to Napoleon. A revolution in Syria will likely result in someone worse than Assad according to basic conservative principals especially given the cost of the revolution yet conservatives are on board with bombing of the airfields.

But then our Founders discarded all this and started their own revolution against impossible odds.

They believe in tradition and slow change-right?

We shouldn't have pushed for the fall of the Evil Empire, because communism had become a tradition?

The gradual change in China seems to have worked out better than the rapid change in the USSR.

 

[B. Kidd]

They believe in tradition and slow change-right? The English did better than the French because they proceeded to democracy slowly preserving the best of the past or what worked[ running water, banking, religion, etc] without a violent revolution that led to Napoleon. A revolution in Syria will likely result in someone worse than Assad according to basic conservative principals especially given the cost of the revolution yet conservatives are on board with bombing of the airfields.

But then our Founders discarded all this and started their own revolution against impossible odds.

They believe in tradition and slow change-right?

We shouldn't have pushed for the fall of the Evil Empire, because communism had become a tradition?

The gradual change in China seems to have worked out better than the rapid change in the USSR.

Yet, even that will change soon for China.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

They believe in tradition and slow change-right? The English did better than the French because they proceeded to democracy slowly preserving the best of the past or what worked[ running water, banking, religion, etc] without a violent revolution that led to Napoleon. A revolution in Syria will likely result in someone worse than Assad according to basic conservative principals especially given the cost of the revolution yet conservatives are on board with bombing of the airfields.

But then our Founders discarded all this and started their own revolution against impossible odds.

They believe in tradition and slow change-right?

We shouldn't have pushed for the fall of the Evil Empire, because communism had become a tradition?

The gradual change in China seems to have worked out better than the rapid change in the USSR.

Yet, even that will change soon for China.

what will change and how do you know that????

 

[ScienceRocks]

Americans should always support the least religious and least conservative. End of story.

 

[B. Kidd]

They believe in tradition and slow change-right? The English did better than the French because they proceeded to democracy slowly preserving the best of the past or what worked[ running water, banking, religion, etc] without a violent revolution that led to Napoleon. A revolution in Syria will likely result in someone worse than Assad according to basic conservative principals especially given the cost of the revolution yet conservatives are on board with bombing of the airfields.

But then our Founders discarded all this and started their own revolution against impossible odds.

They believe in tradition and slow change-right?

We shouldn't have pushed for the fall of the Evil Empire, because communism had become a tradition?

The gradual change in China seems to have worked out better than the rapid change in the USSR.

Yet, even that will change soon for China.

what will change and how do you know that????

One scenario in dealing with China as regards N. Korea, would be that the U.S. withdraw from S. Korea after letting S. Korea and Japan acquire nukes. Even the threat of that happening would disrupt Chinas' comfort zone.
See, there are solutions to world problems. You just have to think 'outside of the box'!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

See, there are solutions to world problems.

1) care to give us one???????????
2) care to tell us why subject you are on????????????

 

[B. Kidd]

See, there are solutions to world problems.

1) care to give us one???????????
2) care to tell us why subject you are on????????????

I just gave you one as regards N. Korea, dolt!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

See, there are solutions to world problems.

1) care to give us one???????????
2) care to tell us why subject you are on????????????

I just gave you one as regards N. Korea, dolt!

giving japan and South korea nukes solves what problem????????????

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

They believe in tradition and slow change-right? The English did better than the French because they proceeded to democracy slowly preserving the best of the past or what worked[ running water, banking, religion, etc] without a violent revolution that led to Napoleon. A revolution in Syria will likely result in someone worse than Assad according to basic conservative principals especially given the cost of the revolution yet conservatives are on board with bombing of the airfields.

But then our Founders discarded all this and started their own revolution against impossible odds.

They believe in tradition and slow change-right?

We shouldn't have pushed for the fall of the Evil Empire, because communism had become a tradition?

The gradual change in China seems to have worked out better than the rapid change in the USSR.

You're defending Communism?

 

[dani67]

They believe in tradition and slow change-right? The English did better than the French because they proceeded to democracy slowly preserving the best of the past or what worked[ running water, banking, religion, etc] without a violent revolution that led to Napoleon. A revolution in Syria will likely result in someone worse than Assad( as it did in Egypt ,Iraq, Libya) according to basic conservative principals, especially given the cost of the revolution, yet conservatives are on board with bombing of the airfields.

But then our Founders discarded all this and started their own revolution against impossible odds.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Americans should always support the least religious and least conservative. End of story.

Is that why you support Communism? Silly Matty.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

You're defending Communism?

no, defending slow change to Republican capitalism

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You're defending Communism?

no, defending slow change to capitalism

"Stay enslaved just a little while longer.
Because quick freedom is bad"

Have I told you lately you're a moron?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Americans should always support the least religious and least conservative. End of story.

so Stalin and Mao are your heros???????

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

"Stay enslaved just a little while longer.
Because quick freedom is bad"

yes we just learned that again in Iraq, Libya, Egypt Syria. It is the basic principle of Burke, Kirk and modern conservatism.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

"Stay enslaved just a little while longer.
Because quick freedom is bad"

yes we just learned that in Iraq, Libya, Egypt Syria. It is the basic principle of Burke, Kirk and modern conservatism.

Modern conservatism says stay enslaved longer? You're a moron.