great piece of research:
Hmm...
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Te database includes 749 ācasesā involving almost 1,100 individuals.
- A closer examination reveals:⢠Only 105 cases come within the past ļ¬ve years, and 488 within the past 10 years. Tirty-two cases are from the 1980s and 1990s. Indicative of its overreach, the database even includes a case from 1948 (when Harry S. īruman beat Tomas Dewey) and a case from 1972 (when Richard Nixon defeated George McGovern). Over the period considered by Heritage, there have been over 3 billion votes cast in federal elections alone, and many more when you include the state and local elections also covered in the database. Te number of cases in the database represent a miniscule portion of the overall number of votes cast during this time span.
Interesting analysis and seriously difficult to dismiss, unlike the Heritage report
Heritage Fraud Database: An Assessment
Yep, there is voter fraud, how much we donāt know, but Libs like you think it is too inconvenient for a person to show an ID. You canāt get a bank account, a credit card, rent an apartment or let alone buy a house with out one, but when it comes to voting, well that just to hard for Libs to figure out.
If only it was about just ID's.
What about demanding a street address at an indian reservation? Where there are no street addresses?
Or shrinking the number of polling places in Democratic areas?
Or what's going on in North Carolina from Republicans.
It's way more than ID.
ID is the Kool Aid the dumpsters drink.