Connecticut joins the Confederacy, declares themselves "sovereign" and independent of the United States

[RetiredGySgt]

California lost not because of the mask requirement but because of how it was written:

“California is not imposing a neutral public-safety rule on everyone. It is selectively burdening federal officers.”

Judge blocks California’s ban on federal agents wearing masks but requires badges be clearly seen

A federal judge on Monday blocked a California law from going into effect that would ban federal immigration agents from covering their faces, but they will still be required to wear clear identification showing their agency and badge number.

www.ksbw.com

Connecticut doesnt have that issue.

they will lose in court as well. Dumb ****.

 

[BlindBoo]

We are a federation of sovereign states that operate within the framework of the.....You know everything they teach in 8th grade civic class. Wait, do they still have civics classes?

 

[citygator]

I do not really care about New England. I wish I did. Near all Senators and Representatives are Progressive Socialist Communists. Neighboring states New York, New Jersey and Delaware and Maryland are getting closer and closer with areas inside them in full Communist glory.

Only retarded low IQ MAGAts would think that the capitalist engine of the north east was socialist. Are you retarded? Answer that honestly. If the answer is no... then explain how this nation's capitalist engines of the north east and california are actaully not capitalist centers. Dipshits.. all of you.

 

[Gary Seven]

It's funny how fast the left will run to the idea of being soveriegn when their whole thing is to take soveriegnty away from the states. This is just what was discussed in the thread on their tactics.

This guy only hates ICE. He could care less about the Constitution.

So he uses, only because we hold it dear, as a weapon.

In power, he'd burn it if he could get away with that.

State's Rights only apply to Blue States.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

STOP WATCHING FOX NEWS. Its rotting your brain.

• Barack Obamaexpanded border enforcement significantly during his presidency.
  • Border Patrol staffing roughly doubled compared to the early 2000s.
  • Large investments were made in fencing, surveillance drones, and deportation operations.
  • Obama was criticized by immigration activists for record deportation numbers, earning the nickname “deporter in chief” from some on the left.
• Joe Biden supported the 2024 bipartisan Senate border billnegotiated with Republicans.
  • The proposal included thousands of new asylum officers and Border Patrol agents, faster asylum processing, more detention capacity, and authority to temporarily shut down asylum claims during surges.
  • Many Democrats supported it because they viewed it as a tougher enforcement framework combined with legal immigration reforms.
• Chuck Schumer and many Senate Democrats voted for funding packagesthat included:
  • additional border technology,
  • fentanyl interdiction,
  • more customs officers,
  • and physical barriers in some areas.
• Hillary Clinton in the 2000s supported “secure borders” language and voted for measures that included fencing and enforcement expansions.
• The 2006 Secure Fence Act passed with support from many Democrats, includingthen-Senators:
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Barack Obama
  • Joe Biden
• Democratic governors and mayors in border or migrant-destination areas have also pushed for stricter enforcement or faster removals when systems became overwhelmed. Examples include:
  • Eric Adams calling for stronger federal action during the migrant surge,
  • and some Democratic governors deploying National Guard resources to assist with border operations or fentanyl interdiction.

The main philosophical difference continues to be:

• Republicans emphasize deterrence, detention, deportation, and physical barriers.
• Democrats pair enforcement with asylum access, legal immigration pathways, worker visas, and protections for long-term undocumented residents.

No one is for open borders bullshit. It is just FOXNews rotting your brain. I swear you guys are lazy as fck to look into this stuff.

Nice copy and paste.

No one is "rotting" my brain. I can see very clearly which side of the aisle are the ones who will always fight attempts to secure our borders, and who fight to stop deportations, and who now even want to abolish ICE. Hint, it's not conservatives.
You mention the 'bipartisan bill'. When it didnt pass, Dimocrats were outraged, claiming that Republicans didnt want to secure the border.
Trump has shown that no new legislation was needed, we just needed to kick Biden out of the WH.
Even the NYT had to finally admit that Biden royally fucked up with his executive policies.

How Biden Ignored Warnings and Lost Americans’ Faith in Immigration​

"The Democratic president and his top advisers rejected recommendations that could have eased the border crisis that helped return Donald Trump to the White House."

"The warnings came true, and then some. After Mr. Biden became president, migrant encounters at the southern border quickly doubled, then kept rising. New arrivals overwhelmed border stations, then border towns, and eventually major cities like New York and Denver."

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/07/us/politics/biden-immigration-trump.html

 

[citygator]

Nice copy and paste.

No one is "rotting" my brain. I can see very clearly which side of the aisle are the ones who will always fight attempts to secure our borders, and who fight to stop deportations, and who now even want to abolish ICE. Hint, it's not conservatives.
You mention the 'bipartisan bill'. When it didnt pass, Dimocrats were outraged, claiming that Republicans didnt want to secure the border.
Trump has shown that no new legislation was needed, we just needed to kick Biden out of the WH.
Even the NYT had to finally admit that Biden royally fucked up with his executive policies.

How Biden Ignored Warnings and Lost Americans’ Faith in Immigration​

"The Democratic president and his top advisers rejected recommendations that could have eased the border crisis that helped return Donald Trump to the White House."

"The warnings came true, and then some. After Mr. Biden became president, migrant encounters at the southern border quickly doubled, then kept rising. New arrivals overwhelmed border stations, then border towns, and eventually major cities like New York and Denver."

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/07/us/politics/biden-immigration-trump.html

I just explained in detail how you were wrong with examples from each presidency. But you keep watching Fox news with your brain rot.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

I just explained in detail how you were wrong with examples from each presidency. But you keep watching Fox news with your brain rot.

You know, it really pisses me off when you guys pull this crap. There's a reason our border is not being trampled now compared to the last administration, have you missed that FACT?!

But, ok, let's take your so-called "examples".

Do you know why Obama was known as the 'deporter-in-chief'? You can research this yourself, but Obama had very high deportation #'s because first of all, the #'s of border crossers swelled the moment Bush left and he took over.
But the chief reason was due to the fact that his administration counted turn-backs, as 'deportations'. His reported #'s were not honest.

Then you have the ******* nerve, the absolute gall to post this gem:

• Democratic governors and mayors in border or migrant-destination areas have also pushed for stricter enforcement or faster removals when systems became overwhelmed. Examples include:
  
  • Eric Adams calling for stronger federal action during the migrant surge,
  • and some Democratic governors deploying National Guard resources to assist with border operations or fentanyl interdiction.

Gee, why would they be wanting help? Hmmmmmmm? Simple, they knew that having a Dim in the WH means their cities are going to be impacted in a big way. You know its true, but you're incapable of admitting it.

I can show you article after article of hospitals around the country that were overwhelmed and many lost millions of dollars, some filing for bankruptcy, all thanks to Biden's invitation to the third-world to "surge to the border".
Did you even bother to read the New York Times article I posted? It spells it out for you.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I like to say "it's always 1860 in the Democrat party".

And they just keep proving me right. Lol

Not so surprising when Texas and AZ try to defend their borders from illegals he would want federal control. Democrats just want more illegals. That’s their constituency.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

STOP WATCHING FOX NEWS. Its rotting your brain.

• Barack Obamaexpanded border enforcement significantly during his presidency.
  • Border Patrol staffing roughly doubled compared to the early 2000s.
  • Large investments were made in fencing, surveillance drones, and deportation operations.
  • Obama was criticized by immigration activists for record deportation numbers, earning the nickname “deporter in chief” from some on the left.
• Joe Biden supported the 2024 bipartisan Senate border billnegotiated with Republicans.
  • The proposal included thousands of new asylum officers and Border Patrol agents, faster asylum processing, more detention capacity, and authority to temporarily shut down asylum claims during surges.
  • Many Democrats supported it because they viewed it as a tougher enforcement framework combined with legal immigration reforms.
• Chuck Schumer and many Senate Democrats voted for funding packagesthat included:
  • additional border technology,
  • fentanyl interdiction,
  • more customs officers,
  • and physical barriers in some areas.
• Hillary Clinton in the 2000s supported “secure borders” language and voted for measures that included fencing and enforcement expansions.
• The 2006 Secure Fence Act passed with support from many Democrats, includingthen-Senators:
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Barack Obama
  • Joe Biden
• Democratic governors and mayors in border or migrant-destination areas have also pushed for stricter enforcement or faster removals when systems became overwhelmed. Examples include:
  • Eric Adams calling for stronger federal action during the migrant surge,
  • and some Democratic governors deploying National Guard resources to assist with border operations or fentanyl interdiction.

The main philosophical difference continues to be:

• Republicans emphasize deterrence, detention, deportation, and physical barriers.
• Democrats pair enforcement with asylum access, legal immigration pathways, worker visas, and protections for long-term undocumented residents.

No one is for open borders bullshit. It is just FOXNews rotting your brain. I swear you guys are lazy as fck to look into this stuff.

Kind of crazy how all of your democrat examples played around on the edges by not actually stopping the problem yet Trump was able to do that in a matter of weeks.

The illegals coming into the country are pretty much cut down to none. All of your other bullshit doesn’t matter. He fixed the problem and is cleaning up the interior of those your people let in.

 

[BluesLegend]

The idiocy/hypocrisy of the leftist so-called Democrats is interesting. They loudly scream that they are trying to save "Democracy" and want "No Kings." At the same time, because the Supreme Court adheres to the Constitution in its rulings, they claim it is "illegitimate," and because there is an opposition political party currently running the federal administration, they claim that too is "illegitimate," even though it was the majority of the voters who chose and stand by the current administration.
All one can gather from all of their noise is that they reject political opposition having the opportunity to win elections and thus reject Democracy and should they get the administration back, they will do their best to no longer allow Democratic choices in candidates. In the end, their solution to their perceived situation is an authoritarian/tyrannical government run by a dictator of some sort.

That's because the Dem regime wants to RULE WITH AN IRON FIST and things like the SCOTUS, U.S. Constitution, the law, free and fair elections get in the way of that.

 

[BluesLegend]

Not so surprising when Texas and AZ try to defend their borders from illegals he would want federal control. Democrats just want more illegals. That’s their constituency.

Democrats don't really want illegals, not in their cities and not in their states. They are fine if the illegals flood into red states however.

When we shipped Joe Biden's illegals to California, New York, and Chicago Democrats squealed like stuck pigs. And we all know what happened when we bussed illegals to Martha's Vineyard.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Democrats don't really want illegals, not in their cities and not in their states. They are fine if the illegals flood into red states however.

When we shipped Joe Biden's illegals to California, New York, and Chicago Democrats squealed like stuck pigs. And we all know what happened when we bussed illegals to Martha's Vineyard.

True, they want the illegals and the crime. Just not near them.

 

[BluesLegend]

True, they want the illegals and the crime. Just not near them.

I have struggled to pick a word that best describes today's Democrats. Evil seems inadequate. Corrupt doesn't cover it. Vile seems the best and even it falls short.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I have struggled to pick a word that best describes today's Democrats. Evil seems inadequate. Corrupt doesn't cover it. Vile seems the best and even it falls short.

They want and demand group think. Thats their goal.