Raskin made the opening statement for the Democrats where he warned Blondie that she would not be allowed to stray from the questions asked.
Raskin's party lost in a landslide, so he does not set the rules in congress about how witnesses answer questions.
She refused to answer questions related to her job and was cut off for doing so
No, she tried to answer the questions that required more than a yes or no.And was cut off immediately.
What did the stock market hitting 50,000 have to do with any question?
Sticks in your craw doesn't it?
The point is that we are not comparing Donald trump, who did nothing about Epstein, to previous Democrat presidents, who were all over the epstein case, making sure that every adult involved with epstein, was prosecuted to the full extent of the law. That seems to be the completely counterfactual premis of all these questions.
When the Department of Justice and the FBI were filled with Trump haters, they constantly cited e
stablish procedures and precedents to justify refusing to talk to congresss. when pam bondi took office, the established precedents by those anti trump prosecutors and investigators was not to prosecute the men involved with jeffrey Epstein.
You are fine with it back then.What's different now?
The point is that donald trump has released more names and been much more open about the epstein files than joe biden ever was AND the economy is growing under Trump.
Democrats don't hate trump for doing less than he did about Epstein, and for doing poorly with the economy. They hate him because they can't stand the fact that he has done more about Epstein than they ever did and that the economy is doing great.
Joe biden will likely never be found in the epstein files. Epstein and Maxwell's girls were much too old for joe biden.
So who was he protecting during his four years as president?