Congratulations Zohran Mamdani…You and NYC are now in the crosshairs of an aggressive and very vengeful Donald Trump.

Will we see troops in NYC….A major iCE presence? Cuts in federal funding? I suspect that Trump already has the wheels turning…I’m sure he’s got his people staying up late tonight to come up with the ‘plan’ that he’ll no doubt unleash on NYC and the foreign mayor ASAP.
Get ready NYC….you asked for it.
It appears Mamdani is ready for Trump and his minions based on his comments in his victory speech:

Zohran Mamdani Wins, Brings Fight to Trump: ‘Turn the Volume Up’

"'Donald Trump, since I know you’re watching, I have four words for you: Turn the volume up,' Mamdani declared in his victory speech.

"'We will hold bad landlords to account, because the Donald Trumps of our city have grown far too comfortable, taking advantage of their tenants. We will put an end to the culture of corruption that has allowed billionaires like Trump to evade taxation and exploit tax breaks. We will stand alongside unions and expand labor protections, because we know, just as Donald Trump does, that when working people have ironclad rights, the bosses who seek to extort them become very small indeed.'

"'New York will
remain a city of immigrants – a city built by immigrants, powered by immigrants, and as of tonight, led by an immigrant.'

"In a final note to Trump, he said, 'To get to any of us, you will have to get through all of us.'"
 
What do you call seizing the means of production? 10-20% today, how much tomorrow?

Trump didn’t seize anything. The government now owns a non-controlling interest in Intel in the interest of national security and a much needed commodity. As pointed out earlier, Obama oversaw a 90%+ takeover of AIG and over 60% of GM.
 
Trump didn’t seize anything. The government now owns a non-controlling interest in Intel in the interest of national security and a much needed commodity. As pointed out earlier, Obama oversaw a 90%+ takeover of AIG and over 60% of GM.
What’s our stake now?
 
Tariffs are a different topic than protecting the supply chain for much needed chips and energy by investing in US based manufacturing.

IF these industries were profitable, we wouldn't need to invest in them. They'd easily get private equity.

It amuses me you scream all day about Food Stamps, but have no problem with Corporate Welfare.
 
Trump didn’t seize anything. The government now owns a non-controlling interest in Intel in the interest of national security and a much needed commodity. As pointed out earlier, Obama oversaw a 90%+ takeover of AIG and over 60% of GM.

After they went bankrupt (oddly, all the "producers" still got their eight figure salaries, imagine that!) and the government had to manage the money to keep them solvent.

When they were stabalized, they were sold back to private owners.

There's really no good reason for Trump to take over Intel. Last I heard, it was doing fine. It certainly shouldn't be ran like one of his Casinos! :omg: :omg: :omg: :omg: :omg: :omg: :omg:
 
It amuses me you scream all day about Food Stamps, but have no problem with Corporate Welfare.

In the case of farmers and Intel, it is for the greater good of everyone in the country, not just a select few.

There's really no good reason for Trump to take over Intel.

A passive 10% stake is not taking over.
 
In the case of farmers and Intel, it is for the greater good of everyone in the country, not just a select few.



A passive 10% stake is not taking over.

Socialism for me but not for thee... got it.

the only reason why we are bailing out the farmers is that these inbreds are a reliably consistent voting block. Our agriculture is as close to Socialism as this country gets, and you guys are ooh, so fine with it.
 
Socialism for me but not for thee... got it.

the only reason why we are bailing out the farmers is that these inbreds are a reliably consistent voting block. Our agriculture is as close to Socialism as this country gets, and you guys are ooh, so fine with it.

Liberals don't eat? Who knew.
 
15th post
Liberals don't eat? Who knew.

Not my point at all, but never mind.

Okay, dun, der, Cleetus, if you eliminated the USDA and Food Stamps, most farms would go out of business.

In short our whole agricultural system is as Socialist as ****, and has been since the New Deal.

Except the inbreds really don't want to work, which is why they have to bring in all these migrants to do the harvesting.
 
Are you stupid or has Zionist propaganda controlled your mind?


BL is a pill popping Zionist Fascist Sub with an IQ under 5.

He loves "conservative" W for giving him free Pfizer pills as he tries to tell NYC voters that Zohran is a "terrorist."

He is EXHIBIT A of what is wrong with the GOP, why the GOP hasn't been at all conservative for a quarter century, why the Fed Debt is up 6 fold and the Faux News Pro Israel Christian doesn't notice and doesn't care.

BL is an "LBJ Democrat" and exactly who LBJ was describing here...


Someone To Look Down On | Shane Phipps




BL cannot discuss fiscal issues because they involve NUMBERS and BL doesn't understand basic math. BL didn't like a "black woman" running in VA as Gov and hence supported 100% left wing Zionist Fascist Spanberger for being "white" and "Pro israel," BL's definition of "patriotic American." BL doesn't care about truth and doesn't have any.

BL will be the very first "Republican" to endorse Spanberger in 2028.
 
Not my point at all, but never mind.

Okay, dun, der, Cleetus, if you eliminated the USDA and Food Stamps, most farms would go out of business.

In short our whole agricultural system is as Socialist as ****, and has been since the New Deal.

Except the inbreds really don't want to work, which is why they have to bring in all these migrants to do the harvesting.

Yes, we must all eat and therefore, much like national defense, the government plays a role. I am in favor of removing much of this support, but then Democrats would throw yet another tantrum. They don’t want farmers receiving any sorts of subsidies, but they do want to eat(for free) and from what I have seen, it is your ilk that doesn’t want to work for anything.
 
Yes, we must all eat and therefore, much like national defense, the government plays a role. I am in favor of removing much of this support, but then Democrats would throw yet another tantrum. They don’t want farmers receiving any sorts of subsidies, but they do want to eat(for free) and from what I have seen, it is your ilk that doesn’t want to work for anything.

I think you are confused. Democrats created most of the subsidies for the inbreds.

But the inbreds, being stupid, keep voting Republican even though they'd slash these subsidies if they got a chance.
 
Back
Top Bottom