The issue here is that Cotton and his mates do not want to move forward. They want to glory in a past that didnt exist. I would agree with your interpretation of land of the freeand certainly the US was a shining light when compared to Russia for example. Why are folk so sensitive about the rest of it ? We have the same issue over her amongst the uneducated. They cant accept a past that is not black and white.All societies tend to gild the lily of their histories to put a positive spin on their most distinguished sons and daughters. Not just Europeans (and those of us descended of from Europeans) but all societies.
Japanese History enshrined their national origins to heavenly intervention and didn't demote their Emperor from demi-god status until the mid 20th Century.
The Chinese word for China -- Chung Kuo -- literally means, nation at the heart of all others and they looked down on all nations (even that of Gordon) as inferior barbarians -- and idea that is still prominent in Chinese policies.
America refers to itself in song and history as "The Land of the Free" not because all men in it have always been free -- Blacks, Irish, and Asians can attest to the inaccuracy of that. It refers to itself that way because for most of the people seeking opportunities in the New World, it was a much more free society than the class and caste structures nations of Europe and elsewhere. A society that continuously evolves to embrace more freedoms.
Putting your Historical icons on a pedestal is a poetic license of course, but it very useful in setting a standard for others to attempt to follow in their footsteps, guided by their forward progress, and not distracted by their missteps.
Perhaps Ms Nightingale did look down on the fuzzy-wuzzies. One can hardly fault her with that considering the attitudes of the time. But, she did lay down many of the principles of modern nursing. Nursing that today is practiced in every country in the world by women and men of every race, creed, and color. Not because of the bad things she thought, but because of the good things she did.
You can say some really abysmal things about Gandhi. If you look closely, he was a bit of a bastard. So was Mother Theresa. But, we don't hold them up as examples of good because of their faults. We do so because of their many, many positive achievements.
If you degrade every name in History, every statue, every shrine to people who did a lot of good because, heaven forbid, they once didn't tip their servants, or held perfectly legitimate (from a contemporary perspective) opinions on unrelated subjects, then you remove all inspiration from their achievements.
Part of moving forward is acknowledging our mistakes. But, if we dwell on our mistakes to the point where we ignore the achievements, we make no progress at all.
i don't know if this was ever the case. it has certainly not been in my lifetime.
you are only focused on destroying the west.