Confed. Flag loving terrorists bombs Walmart.

[idb]

Does anyone have a picture of the Walmart that was destroyed by this "terrorist bombing". Usually something like that would make national headlines. So far I haven't seen the extent of damage done. For all we know he set off a firecracker.

It did made national news. Unfortunately, your computer is set to only go to right wing extremist sites, like Breitbart.


Man bombed Wal-Mart because it stopped selling Confederate flags, police say

why did it make national news???


do you listen to only left-wing extremist sites leftard??

What a shame that you can't address the topic of the thread but continue to derail and insult. What about this moron who tried to bomb WalMart? What's your take on him, his "cause", and his inability to even make a half-way decent bomb?

To be fair, I think that, through the smoke of insults and red herrings he's made his points quite well.

They are that this man can't be a terrorist because;
1 No one got hurt or killed,
2 There have been left wing terrorists in the past,
3 'Others' can be terrorists even if no one gets hurt or killed because intent matters.

That all seems pretty clear.

 

[bedowin62]

Does anyone have a picture of the Walmart that was destroyed by this "terrorist bombing". Usually something like that would make national headlines. So far I haven't seen the extent of damage done. For all we know he set off a firecracker.

It did made national news. Unfortunately, your computer is set to only go to right wing extremist sites, like Breitbart.


Man bombed Wal-Mart because it stopped selling Confederate flags, police say

why did it make national news???


do you listen to only left-wing extremist sites leftard??

What a shame that you can't address the topic of the thread but continue to derail and insult. What about this moron who tried to bomb WalMart? What's your take on him, his "cause", and his inability to even make a half-way decent bomb?

To be fair, I think that, through the smoke of insults and red herrings he's made his points quite well.

They are that this man can't be a terrorist because;
1 No one got hurt or killed,
2 There have been left wing terrorists in the past,
3 'Others' can be terrorists even if no one gets hurt or killed because intent matters.

That all seems pretty clear.

when you are losing a debate just declare yourself the winner; come to conclusions that werent made; because you cant make YOUR CASE

instead of crying about me; why dont you say what makes him a terrorist????

 

[bedowin62]

Does anyone have a picture of the Walmart that was destroyed by this "terrorist bombing". Usually something like that would make national headlines. So far I haven't seen the extent of damage done. For all we know he set off a firecracker.

It did made national news. Unfortunately, your computer is set to only go to right wing extremist sites, like Breitbart.


Man bombed Wal-Mart because it stopped selling Confederate flags, police say

why did it make national news???


do you listen to only left-wing extremist sites leftard??

What a shame that you can't address the topic of the thread but continue to derail and insult. What about this moron who tried to bomb WalMart? What's your take on him, his "cause", and his inability to even make a half-way decent bomb?

To be fair, I think that, through the smoke of insults and red herrings he's made his points quite well.

They are that this man can't be a terrorist because;
1 No one got hurt or killed,
2 There have been left wing terrorists in the past,
3 'Others' can be terrorists even if no one gets hurt or killed because intent matters.

That all seems pretty clear.

1. i didnt say he cant be a terrorist BECAUSE nobody got killed. try again
2. there HAVE been terrorists in the past
3. others can be terrorists if they intended to kill (see your #1) cant have it both ways idiot. you either use that item to make your case or say im using it to make mine, but you cant do both

you're pathetic

keeep trying........................

 

[bodecea]

Does anyone have a picture of the Walmart that was destroyed by this "terrorist bombing". Usually something like that would make national headlines. So far I haven't seen the extent of damage done. For all we know he set off a firecracker.

It did made national news. Unfortunately, your computer is set to only go to right wing extremist sites, like Breitbart.


Man bombed Wal-Mart because it stopped selling Confederate flags, police say

why did it make national news???


do you listen to only left-wing extremist sites leftard??

What a shame that you can't address the topic of the thread but continue to derail and insult. What about this moron who tried to bomb WalMart? What's your take on him, his "cause", and his inability to even make a half-way decent bomb?

he's an idiot. why do you people fall apart if you cant frame every debate? Are you all over these boards crying about people on your own side who deviate away from the thread topic? of course you arent. what a shame you cant even be honest with YOURSELF and seem to need to get sanctimonious with me.
i'm addressing what the moron left-winger OP wanted to make his premise. YOU already stated the guy is hopelessly inept and a loser.................how then is it you want me to make a federal case out of one loser???? BECAUSE YOU WANT TO, I HAVE TO????

Not asking you to make a federal case out of anything....but it is interesting that if you think this isn't a big deal, why do many posts off topic and so many personal attacks by you on this thread. It does make one wonder.

 

[idb]

Does anyone have a picture of the Walmart that was destroyed by this "terrorist bombing". Usually something like that would make national headlines. So far I haven't seen the extent of damage done. For all we know he set off a firecracker.

It did made national news. Unfortunately, your computer is set to only go to right wing extremist sites, like Breitbart.


Man bombed Wal-Mart because it stopped selling Confederate flags, police say

why did it make national news???


do you listen to only left-wing extremist sites leftard??

What a shame that you can't address the topic of the thread but continue to derail and insult. What about this moron who tried to bomb WalMart? What's your take on him, his "cause", and his inability to even make a half-way decent bomb?

To be fair, I think that, through the smoke of insults and red herrings he's made his points quite well.

They are that this man can't be a terrorist because;
1 No one got hurt or killed,
2 There have been left wing terrorists in the past,
3 'Others' can be terrorists even if no one gets hurt or killed because intent matters.

That all seems pretty clear.

when you are losing a debate just declare yourself the winner; come to conclusions that werent made; because you cant make YOUR CASE

instead of crying about me; why dont you say what makes him a terrorist????

I'm not crying about you at all.
I was complimenting your clear-eyed grasp of the facts.

 

[idb]

How does bringing up the Weather Underground lessen this act of terrorism?

You must not be very astute...it is known as " deflection."
People usually resort to it when they can not refute the issue at hand, such as "bedwetter`s" continious efforts to derail the op...

Ooooohh....***slaps forehead***!

 

[bedowin62]

It did made national news. Unfortunately, your computer is set to only go to right wing extremist sites, like Breitbart.


Man bombed Wal-Mart because it stopped selling Confederate flags, police say

why did it make national news???


do you listen to only left-wing extremist sites leftard??

What a shame that you can't address the topic of the thread but continue to derail and insult. What about this moron who tried to bomb WalMart? What's your take on him, his "cause", and his inability to even make a half-way decent bomb?

To be fair, I think that, through the smoke of insults and red herrings he's made his points quite well.

They are that this man can't be a terrorist because;
1 No one got hurt or killed,
2 There have been left wing terrorists in the past,
3 'Others' can be terrorists even if no one gets hurt or killed because intent matters.

That all seems pretty clear.

when you are losing a debate just declare yourself the winner; come to conclusions that werent made; because you cant make YOUR CASE

instead of crying about me; why dont you say what makes him a terrorist????

I'm not crying about you at all.
I was complimenting your clear-eyed grasp of the facts.

ok cool!!

lol

 

[reconmark]

How does bringing up the Weather Underground lessen this act of terrorism?

it puts it in perspective'


duh

So, is it now a lesser act because of the perspective you've been able to incisively apply?
That'll piss off the terrorist I'm sure.

YAWN

it's probably a "lesser act" because it's a lesser act you idiot.

did anybody get hurt?
killed?

You stupid ass, no one has to be Injured or killed in order for it to be a terrorist act.
Learn the difference between a prank and a terrorist act you idiot.

 

[bedowin62]

How does bringing up the Weather Underground lessen this act of terrorism?

You must not be very astute...it is known as " deflection."
People usually resort to it when they can not refute the issue at hand, such as "bedwetter`s" continious efforts to derail the op...

Ooooohh....***slaps forehead***!

it's not a deflection to address the actual purpose of the OP
it's a deflection to pretend he's doing something else

thanks for playing though

like i've said you arent ready to hang with me

 

[bedowin62]

How does bringing up the Weather Underground lessen this act of terrorism?

it puts it in perspective'


duh

So, is it now a lesser act because of the perspective you've been able to incisively apply?
That'll piss off the terrorist I'm sure.

YAWN

it's probably a "lesser act" because it's a lesser act you idiot.

did anybody get hurt?
killed?

You stupid ass, no one has to be Injured or killed in order for it to be a terrorist act.
Learn the difference between a prank and a terrorist act you idiot.

ok then leftard; what EXACTLY makes it a terrorist act dullard???

too hard for you nutjobs to say???

 

[bedowin62]

be specific if you can leftardz

 

[bedowin62]

tick tock tick tock tick tock tick tock......................................................

 

[bedowin62]

um yea; that's what i thought

 

[bodecea]

um yea; that's what i thought

2 minutes? Got a plane to catch?

 

[idb]

How does bringing up the Weather Underground lessen this act of terrorism?

it puts it in perspective'


duh

So, is it now a lesser act because of the perspective you've been able to incisively apply?
That'll piss off the terrorist I'm sure.

YAWN

it's probably a "lesser act" because it's a lesser act you idiot.

did anybody get hurt?
killed?

You stupid ass, no one has to be Injured or killed in order for it to be a terrorist act.
Learn the difference between a prank and a terrorist act you idiot.

ok then leftard; what EXACTLY makes it a terrorist act dullard???

too hard for you nutjobs to say???

Now it isn't an act of terrorism?
You need to put together a flow diagram so we can follow your logic...you're obviously so far ahead of us it's impossible for us to keep up without seeing it all put together on paper...preferably in crayon.

 

[bedowin62]

it puts it in perspective'


duh

So, is it now a lesser act because of the perspective you've been able to incisively apply?
That'll piss off the terrorist I'm sure.

YAWN

it's probably a "lesser act" because it's a lesser act you idiot.

did anybody get hurt?
killed?

You stupid ass, no one has to be Injured or killed in order for it to be a terrorist act.
Learn the difference between a prank and a terrorist act you idiot.

ok then leftard; what EXACTLY makes it a terrorist act dullard???

too hard for you nutjobs to say???

Now it isn't an act of terrorism?
You need to put together a flow diagram so we can follow your logic...you're obviously so far ahead of us it's impossible for us to keep up without seeing it all put together on paper...preferably in crayon.

yawn.

i'm asking YOU to explain why you (apparently) belive it is a terrorist act.

you that much of a coward you cant answer y our own question to me??

that's called.................

wait for it..................

wait for it...................

wait....................

wait..................

a deflection

 

[bedowin62]

YOU and the other idiot say nobody needs to be hurt for it to be terroriism
you also acknowledge intent matters (did y ou not?)

so then by warning people to stay away (even the one employee present) there was no intent to harm anybody

so what other factor makes it a terrorist act/

stop being cowards

 

[bedowin62]

why cant you take a stab at your own question?????

 

[idb]

So, is it now a lesser act because of the perspective you've been able to incisively apply?
That'll piss off the terrorist I'm sure.

YAWN

it's probably a "lesser act" because it's a lesser act you idiot.

did anybody get hurt?
killed?

You stupid ass, no one has to be Injured or killed in order for it to be a terrorist act.
Learn the difference between a prank and a terrorist act you idiot.

ok then leftard; what EXACTLY makes it a terrorist act dullard???

too hard for you nutjobs to say???

Now it isn't an act of terrorism?
You need to put together a flow diagram so we can follow your logic...you're obviously so far ahead of us it's impossible for us to keep up without seeing it all put together on paper...preferably in crayon.

yawn.

i'm asking YOU to explain why you (apparently) belive it is a terrorist act.

you that much of a coward you cant answer y our own question to me??

that's called.................

wait for it..................

wait for it...................

wait....................

wait..................

a deflection

Sheesh...really?
The man posts threatening messages warning that "journal corporate" are going down along with "Walmart, WTVA, Reeds department store", then pulls up outside one of the parties on that list and throws an explosive device in the door.

Perhaps it's a legitimate act of free speech to you?
I'll stake my position here for you and the world to see...I'd call that an act of terrorism.

There...'phew' it feels good to finally come out...

 

[bedowin62]

it's obvious who the deflectors are here, the ones avoiding debate; and it isnt me

by the way who are you to dicate the parameters OF ANY discussion board/

is it not my right to question the purpose of the post and the intent of the thread???