Confed. Flag loving terrorists bombs Walmart.

So, is it now a lesser act because of the perspective you've been able to incisively apply?
That'll piss off the terrorist I'm sure.


YAWN

it's probably a "lesser act" because it's a lesser act you idiot.

did anybody get hurt?
killed?
You stupid ass, no one has to be Injured or killed in order for it to be a terrorist act.
Learn the difference between a prank and a terrorist act you idiot.


ok then leftard; what EXACTLY makes it a terrorist act dullard???

too hard for you nutjobs to say???


Domestic terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:

  • Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
  • Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
  • Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.
Now explain how the hickabilly did not commit all three elements of the FBI`S definition of terrorism...

yawn

1. Because the warning he gave means he never came lose to being a danger to any human life

2. nobody is or was intimidated or coerced by his actions. are you intimidated by him????

3.he wont come close to influencing any policy

4. didnt committ of come close to comitting "mass destruction, assasination, or kidnapping"



WHAT was your point again?


now AGAIN, WHY IS HE A TERRORIST???
Yes you are historically stupid...
It matters not if he told one or two people that he placed a bomb that could injure and/or kill many unsuspecting citizens...that does not mitigate his actions.

His actions were meant to intimidate the mgmt of walmart, its employees and customers because of the refusal to sale a traitorous flag.
Of course your brain can not figure out how a bomb can result in mass casualties.

Please continue to argue from a position of ignorance.
 
it puts it in perspective'


duh
So, is it now a lesser act because of the perspective you've been able to incisively apply?
That'll piss off the terrorist I'm sure.


YAWN

it's probably a "lesser act" because it's a lesser act you idiot.

did anybody get hurt?
killed?
You stupid ass, no one has to be Injured or killed in order for it to be a terrorist act.
Learn the difference between a prank and a terrorist act you idiot.


ok then leftard; what EXACTLY makes it a terrorist act dullard???

too hard for you nutjobs to say???


Domestic terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:

  • Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
  • Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
  • Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.
Now explain how the hickabilly did not commit all three elements of the FBI`S definition of terrorism...

again; explain how he did committ those

you sad pathetic, angry idiot.

you dont get it; YOU'RE making a claim, it's up to you to prove it

crybaby
 
YAWN

it's probably a "lesser act" because it's a lesser act you idiot.

did anybody get hurt?
killed?
You stupid ass, no one has to be Injured or killed in order for it to be a terrorist act.
Learn the difference between a prank and a terrorist act you idiot.


ok then leftard; what EXACTLY makes it a terrorist act dullard???

too hard for you nutjobs to say???


Domestic terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:

  • Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
  • Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
  • Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.
Now explain how the hickabilly did not commit all three elements of the FBI`S definition of terrorism...

yawn

1. Because the warning he gave means he never came lose to being a danger to any human life

2. nobody is or was intimidated or coerced by his actions. are you intimidated by him????

3.he wont come close to influencing any policy

4. didnt committ of come close to comitting "mass destruction, assasination, or kidnapping"



WHAT was your point again?


now AGAIN, WHY IS HE A TERRORIST???
Yes you are historically stupid...
It matters not if he told one or two people that he placed a bomb that could injure and/or kill many unsuspecting citizens...that does not mitigate his actions.

His actions were meant to intimidate the mgmt of walmart, its employees and customers because of the refusal to sale a traitorous flag.
Of course your brain can not figure out how a bomb can result in mass casualties.

Please continue to argue from a position of ignorance.


maybe you should read your own definition again poor angry idiot???

does it say meant to intimidate walmart? or the US government?

holla back leftard!!
lol
 
since i'm the one "deflecting" according to you crybaby leftists; because this thread is about this guy; if i start a thread using THIS, YOUR DEFINITION AND STANDARD DEFINING TERRORISM, will you left-wing losers be there to explain how literally thousands of left-wingers who threw explosive devices and make, indeed continue to make revolutionary comments in the BLACK LIVES MATTER and did so in the OCCUPY movement, arent terrorists in YOUR EYES, ACCORDING TO YOUR OWN DEFINITION?????????????????????????


see you soon leftardz!! toodles!!
Bye bye.
He cant admit to his ignorance...
 
since i'm the one "deflecting" according to you crybaby leftists; because this thread is about this guy; if i start a thread using THIS, YOUR DEFINITION AND STANDARD DEFINING TERRORISM, will you left-wing losers be there to explain how literally thousands of left-wingers who threw explosive devices and make, indeed continue to make revolutionary comments in the BLACK LIVES MATTER and did so in the OCCUPY movement, arent terrorists in YOUR EYES, ACCORDING TO YOUR OWN DEFINITION?????????????????????????


see you soon leftardz!! toodles!!
Bye bye.
He cant admit to his ignorance...


you'er an unhinged loser who cant make your case. you keep moving the bar away FROM YOUR OWN PROVIDED DEFINITION

go cry
 
did obama's buddies in the Weather Underground give advance warning before they killed people with bombs or hijacked armored cares and murdered the guards??

oh and speaking of ineptitude obama's buddies in the Weather Undergound DID MANAGE TO BLOW THEMSELVES UP; with a bomb they wanted to MURDER INNOCENT WIVES AND CHILDREN OF RETRUNING VIETNAM VETERANS, AS WELL AS THE SOLDIERS THEMSELVES, UP AT A USO CLUB ON FORT DIX.

idiots and hypocrites

Off topic.
 
did obama's buddies in the Weather Underground give advance warning before they killed people with bombs or hijacked armored cares and murdered the guards??

oh and speaking of ineptitude obama's buddies in the Weather Undergound DID MANAGE TO BLOW THEMSELVES UP; with a bomb they wanted to MURDER INNOCENT WIVES AND CHILDREN OF RETRUNING VIETNAM VETERANS, AS WELL AS THE SOLDIERS THEMSELVES, UP AT A USO CLUB ON FORT DIX.

idiots and hypocrites

Off topic.
You're going to be busy if you plan on documenting every one of his deflections in this thread.
 
You stupid ass, no one has to be Injured or killed in order for it to be a terrorist act.
Learn the difference between a prank and a terrorist act you idiot.


ok then leftard; what EXACTLY makes it a terrorist act dullard???

too hard for you nutjobs to say???


Domestic terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:

  • Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
  • Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
  • Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.
Now explain how the hickabilly did not commit all three elements of the FBI`S definition of terrorism...

yawn

1. Because the warning he gave means he never came lose to being a danger to any human life

2. nobody is or was intimidated or coerced by his actions. are you intimidated by him????

3.he wont come close to influencing any policy

4. didnt committ of come close to comitting "mass destruction, assasination, or kidnapping"



WHAT was your point again?


now AGAIN, WHY IS HE A TERRORIST???
Yes you are historically stupid...
It matters not if he told one or two people that he placed a bomb that could injure and/or kill many unsuspecting citizens...that does not mitigate his actions.

His actions were meant to intimidate the mgmt of walmart, its employees and customers because of the refusal to sale a traitorous flag.
Of course your brain can not figure out how a bomb can result in mass casualties.

Please continue to argue from a position of ignorance.


maybe you should read your own definition again poor angry idiot???

does it say meant to intimidate walmart? or the US government?

holla back leftard!!
lol
Walmart and customers are a "civilian population"...god you are stupid.
 
did obama's buddies in the Weather Underground give advance warning before they killed people with bombs or hijacked armored cares and murdered the guards??

oh and speaking of ineptitude obama's buddies in the Weather Undergound DID MANAGE TO BLOW THEMSELVES UP; with a bomb they wanted to MURDER INNOCENT WIVES AND CHILDREN OF RETRUNING VIETNAM VETERANS, AS WELL AS THE SOLDIERS THEMSELVES, UP AT A USO CLUB ON FORT DIX.

idiots and hypocrites
such bull crud....do you ever get tired of spilling it?


The (weather underground)bombing campaign mostly targeted government buildings, along with several banks. Most were preceded by evacuation warnings, along with communiqués identifying the particular matter that the attack was intended to protest. No people were killed in any of their acts of property destruction, although three members of the group were killed in the Greenwich Village townhouse explosion.



Obama was 7-8 years old when the group was in its hay day... sheesh!

Aw look at you defending terrorists.


lol!! the premise of this, yet another moronic thread, is that a guy who throws a home-made bomb into an empty Walmart, killing nobody, injuring nobody, is a terrorist but a guy who was a member of a group that actually killed people isnt a terrorist

libs are asinine self-deceivers


It was fireworks.

I guess the liberals will be callling July 4th celebrations bombings now.

Only if you set them off while waving a flag.

Kids-with-sparklers.jpg
<<Terrorists, according to libs.

picture-1.png
<< Justifiable homicide brought about by peaceful protesters, aka "The Weathermen" aka "Bill Ayers" aka "Obama's buddy".



That's an unsolved mystery, dingbat, and has nothing to do with the topic of this thread.
 
Wow, I check out several of the local Mississippi news site and none of them had it on their front page. Had to dig deep but found one blurb about it in local news.

The police say the bag made a "bang" and "caused no damage".

UPDATE: Man arrested for setting off bomb in Tupelo Walmart


Sounds like a lot of hot air.
For the most part it is. Does that change the fact that he is a terrorist?

No, it does not. I think a lot of the problem is thinking that a terrorist must somehow measure up to the king pins of terrorism like OBL. That is silly. I break into your home and steal a microwave and that makes me a robber. The fact that the robber down the street stole 100 grand last week does not change that.

Does the guy deserve to be charged with terrorism and go to jail - yes he does. Does he deserve a life sentence? I don't think so. Let the guy stew for 6 months for his worthless act and see if that teaches him that throwing bombs around is asinine and does not change policy.
 
such bull crud....do you ever get tired of spilling it?


The (weather underground)bombing campaign mostly targeted government buildings, along with several banks. Most were preceded by evacuation warnings, along with communiqués identifying the particular matter that the attack was intended to protest. No people were killed in any of their acts of property destruction, although three members of the group were killed in the Greenwich Village townhouse explosion.



Obama was 7-8 years old when the group was in its hay day... sheesh!

Aw look at you defending terrorists.


lol!! the premise of this, yet another moronic thread, is that a guy who throws a home-made bomb into an empty Walmart, killing nobody, injuring nobody, is a terrorist but a guy who was a member of a group that actually killed people isnt a terrorist

libs are asinine self-deceivers


It was fireworks.

I guess the liberals will be callling July 4th celebrations bombings now.

Only if you set them off while waving a flag.

Kids-with-sparklers.jpg
<<Terrorists, according to libs.

picture-1.png
<< Justifiable homicide brought about by peaceful protesters, aka "The Weathermen" aka "Bill Ayers" aka "Obama's buddy".



That's an unsolved mystery, dingbat, and has nothing to do with the topic of this thread.

Ayers' and his wife's fingerprints were found at the place the bombs were made. Congressional hearings put the blame on Ayers' wife. It also claims that Ayers knew about it. The evidence strongly supports Ayers involvement.

The alleged Walmart bomber needs to be prosecuted and if guilty, pay for his crime.

However, so does the terrorist that actually killed a police officer.
 
Aw look at you defending terrorists.


lol!! the premise of this, yet another moronic thread, is that a guy who throws a home-made bomb into an empty Walmart, killing nobody, injuring nobody, is a terrorist but a guy who was a member of a group that actually killed people isnt a terrorist

libs are asinine self-deceivers


It was fireworks.

I guess the liberals will be callling July 4th celebrations bombings now.

Only if you set them off while waving a flag.

Kids-with-sparklers.jpg
<<Terrorists, according to libs.

picture-1.png
<< Justifiable homicide brought about by peaceful protesters, aka "The Weathermen" aka "Bill Ayers" aka "Obama's buddy".



That's an unsolved mystery, dingbat, and has nothing to do with the topic of this thread.

Ayers' and his wife's fingerprints were found at the place the bombs were made. Congressional hearings put the blame on Ayers' wife. It also claims that Ayers knew about it. The evidence strongly supports Ayers involvement.

The alleged Walmart bomber needs to be prosecuted and if guilty, pay for his crime.

However, so does the terrorist that actually killed a police officer.



That's odd, because it says right here that the print was never identified.


The crime remains unsolved. But in 1999, the department got a tantalizing clue in the form of a fingerprint found on a bomb fragment. The print has never been identified.

Plaque honors slain police officer / Eight others injured in bomb attack that killed sergeant in 1970
 
So so sick of the right wing propaganda and outright LIES.....

ALL liars get thrown in to the lake of fire......So says the Bible....






How long do we have to wait Lord?
 

Forum List

Back
Top