reconmark
Gold Member
Yes you are historically stupid...You stupid ass, no one has to be Injured or killed in order for it to be a terrorist act.So, is it now a lesser act because of the perspective you've been able to incisively apply?
That'll piss off the terrorist I'm sure.
YAWN
it's probably a "lesser act" because it's a lesser act you idiot.
did anybody get hurt?
killed?
Learn the difference between a prank and a terrorist act you idiot.
ok then leftard; what EXACTLY makes it a terrorist act dullard???
too hard for you nutjobs to say???
Domestic terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:
Now explain how the hickabilly did not commit all three elements of the FBI`S definition of terrorism...
- Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
- Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
- Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.
yawn
1. Because the warning he gave means he never came lose to being a danger to any human life
2. nobody is or was intimidated or coerced by his actions. are you intimidated by him????
3.he wont come close to influencing any policy
4. didnt committ of come close to comitting "mass destruction, assasination, or kidnapping"
WHAT was your point again?
now AGAIN, WHY IS HE A TERRORIST???
It matters not if he told one or two people that he placed a bomb that could injure and/or kill many unsuspecting citizens...that does not mitigate his actions.
His actions were meant to intimidate the mgmt of walmart, its employees and customers because of the refusal to sale a traitorous flag.
Of course your brain can not figure out how a bomb can result in mass casualties.
Please continue to argue from a position of ignorance.