Condom size in the US is too restricted.

nitroz

INDEPENDENTly ruthless
May 18, 2011
3,420
480
98
Merritt Island, FL
If you are going to read this and then get offended, making a huffy response when you werent required to read this in the first place, then keep moving.



Ok, you can call this a big dick problem (in my case) or in some other cases, a small dick problem.
You may think "well, they have all types of sizes and latex can stretch" and this IS true. But what is regulated is the opening ring size, which DOES NOT stretch as easy and is more restrictive. Also, brands like durex don't use pure latex, it's half some plastic crap that doesn't stretch which makes putting it on really difficult for me. I'm 7"x5.5" (Average is 5.5"x4.75") and the durex XXL is uncomfortable for me (it's big, but there are others who are bigger. this is to give you some perspective) because IT DOES NOT STRETCH.

Latex ones? lol, good luck. Since condom sizes are really determined by girth and not length and that base ring (or "OW OW OW, GET IT OFF!") is what is regulated.
US condom rules 'will cause nasty RED RINGS on porn stars' todgers' ? The Register

sTOk23X.png


bsNrs1uh.png


eeJz2KT.png


For the increased breakage, it's much bigger for me since that 5.5" in girth does from the base to the head while the head can get bigger. I can but a Magnum XL and still be too big for it. :/
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCAFU6UTLr4]One man and his condoms! - YouTube[/ame]
 

Forum List

Back
Top