Condi Rice Takes Lawrence O'Donnell To School

I gave a link. Bill Clinton confirmed it in an interview. Your denial is your problem. Clinton had opportunities to capture and kill OBL and turned it down. You're just gonna have to deal with reailty. I can't fix it for you.

Denial of what?

I addressed your link.

And Sudan denied ever making those overtures.

Let me get this straight. You are denying Bill Clinton turned down opportunities to capture or kill OBL. Is that correct?

Again..I asked you a direct question on this.

But..lets clear things up..

BBC News | Africa | Sudan denies Bin Laden links

That's a reputable news organization..not a blog.

But lets say there was some "deal" in the works with the Sudan government..who were actively involved in a genocide.

And lets say they wanted international focus off the genocide and US arms.

Would you go for that?
 
United States presidential election, 2000 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


That article was written right AFTER the elction.

The whole story wasnt in yet.






Ultimately, the Media Consortium hired the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago[52] to examine 175,010 ballots that were collected from the entire state not just the disputed counties that were discounted; these ballots contained under-votes (votes with no choice made for president) and over-votes (votes made with more than one choice marked). Their goal was to determine the reliability and accuracy of the systems used for the voting process. The NORC concluded that if the disputes over the validity of all the ballots statewide in question had been consistently resolved and any uniform standard applied, the electoral result would have been reversed and Gore would have won by 107-115 votes.[53]


That is without the voters who were illegally stripped of their vote due to the felons list.
 
Last edited:
Checking felony data from other states, it mistakenly used a list of 8,000 Texans who had committed misdemeanors, not felonies. But DBT officials had little sympathy when some of the transplanted Texans complained of getting letters warning that they could not vote because they were felons.
 
United States presidential election, 2000 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


That article was written right AFTER the elction.

The whole story wasnt in yet.






Ultimately, the Media Consortium hired the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago[52] to examine 175,010 ballots that were collected from the entire state not just the disputed counties that were discounted; these ballots contained under-votes (votes with no choice made for president) and over-votes (votes made with more than one choice marked). Their goal was to determine the reliability and accuracy of the systems used for the voting process. The NORC concluded that if the disputes over the validity of all the ballots statewide in question had been consistently resolved and any uniform standard applied, the electoral result would have been reversed and Gore would have won by 107-115 votes.[53]


That is without the voters who were illegally stripped of their vote due to the felons list.

Wikipedia is not a scholarly source according to its founder and most college professors will not accept a paper with Wikipedia listed as a source. Try again.
 
Now realise that the names were done in such a way as to target black voters.

These 8,000 people were stripped of their vote when there was NO legal reason for it.

That is just one group of people the list screwed
 
They're settling down now. All we hear now is a wimper here and there. Pretty soon they'll forget about this and go on to their next target. Stay tuned.

What are you posting about? You've not answered any direct questions or dealt with any points that respond to your points.

Seriously..are you interested in discussion? Or gotchas and declaring victory when there's none really to be had.

Repeating internet myths and high fiving supposed "pwns" may feel good...but it doesn't help alot in understanding some very complicated and painful history.
 
The sources in the wiki article are fine.

You jsut want a way out of this mess because the facts are piling up on you.
 
Now realise that the names were done in such a way as to target black voters.

These 8,000 people were stripped of their vote when there was NO legal reason for it.

That is just one group of people the list screwed

Now you have to realize that Wikipedia is not considered a scholarly source by its founder and most college professors will not accept a paper with Wikipedia listed as a source.
 
First off..you've done nothing or very little to "prove" Clinton "turned down OBL". In fact you skipped over a direct question to you.

Second..even if Osama bin Laden had been killed..do you really think that 9/11 would not have happened? The plans were in motion for quite some time. And it seems..he had very little to do with the tactical planning.

9/11 might have been stopped had the focus not shifted from "swatting flies" to provoking super powers. Which is what happened once the Bush administration started working.

that's about right.

add the fact that they bushies refused to be briefed on OBL and only wanted to be briefed on iraq... along with baby bush ignoring the PDB and saying "ok, you covered your ass" to the intel people who warned him obl was using planes... and further ignoring the fact they KNEW there were people taking flying lessons who asked to be taught how to STEER jets but not be taught how to take off and land them.

yeah, hang 9/11 on clinton... and take the credit for killing obl from obama.

the rightwingnuts are delusional.

Bill Clinton turned down opportunities to capture OBL and kill him. Fact. To argue otherwise is delusional.
You stupid fuckin' Teabaggers...


FACT!!!
 
Why are you ignoring the other links given?

This happend and the state was forced to drop the use of this list.

It is cold hard fact.

You dont like cold hard facts you prefer Fox news
 
Fla. officials drop purge of felons from voting lists - Baltimore Sun


Fla. officials drop purge of felons from voting lists
State's database is found to contain major floaws
July 11, 2004|By Bob Mahlburg and John Kennedy | Bob Mahlburg and John Kennedy,ORLANDO SENTINELTALLAHASSEE - Florida elections officials decided yesterday to scrap a list of "potential felons" after discovering another flaw that could have proved politically explosive for a state trying to run an undisputed election.

The database, maligned for weeks by civil rights advocates, was dumped because it shielded virtually all Hispanic felons from being purged from the voter rolls. The admission came on top of earlier errors, such as including thousands of people on the list whose rights had already been restored.
 
Last edited:
She kicked his socialist ass. She was not the one who kept interrupting. When someone keeps interrupting you, then you are pretty sure they don't want you to say something they have no answer to.
While that might be true in some situations in the example of Condoleeza Rice it is necessary to interrupt her expansive and wholly redundant ramblings because she has mastered the technique of purposefully consuming allotted time. She demonstrated this during Congressional hearings when she perjured herself while testifying on the subject of the Presidential Daily Briefings.

Rice deliberately protracted her responses to even the simplest questions for the obvious purpose of using up each of the interviewing congressman's time. She did the same thing to O'Donnell and she does it with everyone who interviews her. The exception was Fareed Zakaria who interviewed her but didn't ask one sensitive question, so all of her answers were brief and to the point.

Condoleeza rice is smart but she's more slick than intelligent. Both she and Colin Powell served as Bush's house ******* whose primary duty was to facilitate Bush's agenda by skillfully lying. Both were rewarded with exalted postions in government. The problem is the Congress is too corrupted to make a motivated effort to investigate and prosecute the Bush Administration, which was a massive criminal enterprise. They allow professional liars like Rice, Powell, Yoo, Addington and others to virtually spit in the face of questioners during critical hearings. In fact they allow criminals like Karl Rove to demonstrate absolute contempt by simply refusing to appear and testify.

A proficient and motivated prosecutor could easily waltz Rice into a corner and either obtain essential testimony from her or trap her into perjured testimony and convict her of that crime, as was done with "Scooter" Libby.
 
Last edited:
Now realise that the names were done in such a way as to target black voters.

These 8,000 people were stripped of their vote when there was NO legal reason for it.

That is just one group of people the list screwed

Now you have to realize that Wikipedia is not considered a scholarly source by its founder and most college professors will not accept a paper with Wikipedia listed as a source.

You apparently aren't aware that wikipedia employs footnotes, which, had you gotten beyond the 3rd grade, you would realize are part of legitimate research.
 

Forum List

Back
Top