Concept of White Privilege is Racist

[IM2]

Wrong. You are not superior when you decide to attack a country you knew didn't have the weapons you have. You are not superior because you have rifles.W hat you are is violent and this is a prime example why we can say whites are the most violent race.

They were superior because they knew how to build modern weapons. Ethiopia was a shithole that could make spears, bows and arrows. The Italians did better because they were smarter and had better equipment. How did they get better equipment? By being civilized and less violent in their lands, which allowed their people to live longer and with less fear and worry, developing their intellects and making technological breakthroughs.

The negroes didn't have any shortage of violence in Ethiopia. That's not why they lost. They were just too stupid to beat a modern white fighting force.

Again because they did not male weapons doesn't mean they were superior.

It's not that they didn't make weapons, it's that they couldn't make weapons. They also couldn't run a society that could acquire adequate weapons through trade.

And like I said this is just a show of how violent whites are.

It shows how smart whites are.

They were fighting in Ethiopia but did the Ethiopians decide they were going t invade and destroy another country? No. And that's the separator. Whites ate just extremely violent and more so than any other race. It's not like whites weren't fighting in Europe. So just face the fact, whites are violent, very violent.

Where do you think African slaves came from? They were captured and sold by other blacks. Blacks are quite violent. They were just too stupid to win. African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade

Here we go with that shit again. You really need to go study how this actually happened because I do know and for you to try pawning this disingenuous bullshit as fact just won't work here.

You said blacks were as advanced as whites prior to being colonized:

Which African nations were fine before colonization? Fine by what metric?
If they suck for the next 1000 years, is it still whitey's fault?

Every one of them. By all standard metrics.

So how does that explain how poorly they did in the war against Italy, a second-rate military power. Remember:
1. They had the defensive advantage.
2. They had the numbers advantage.
3. It's not because they were nonviolent, since they actually managed to gather more men to fight and had the above numbers advantage.

Go ahead, explain.

Explain what? Having better weapons doesn't make you more advanced.

 

[bgrouse]

They were superior because they knew how to build modern weapons. Ethiopia was a shithole that could make spears, bows and arrows. The Italians did better because they were smarter and had better equipment. How did they get better equipment? By being civilized and less violent in their lands, which allowed their people to live longer and with less fear and worry, developing their intellects and making technological breakthroughs.

The negroes didn't have any shortage of violence in Ethiopia. That's not why they lost. They were just too stupid to beat a modern white fighting force.

Again because they did not male weapons doesn't mean they were superior.

It's not that they didn't make weapons, it's that they couldn't make weapons. They also couldn't run a society that could acquire adequate weapons through trade.

And like I said this is just a show of how violent whites are.

It shows how smart whites are.

They were fighting in Ethiopia but did the Ethiopians decide they were going t invade and destroy another country? No. And that's the separator. Whites ate just extremely violent and more so than any other race. It's not like whites weren't fighting in Europe. So just face the fact, whites are violent, very violent.

Where do you think African slaves came from? They were captured and sold by other blacks. Blacks are quite violent. They were just too stupid to win. African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade

Here we go with that shit again. You really need to go study how this actually happened because I do know and for you to try pawning this disingenuous bullshit as fact just won't work here.

You said blacks were as advanced as whites prior to being colonized:

Which African nations were fine before colonization? Fine by what metric?
If they suck for the next 1000 years, is it still whitey's fault?

Every one of them. By all standard metrics.

So how does that explain how poorly they did in the war against Italy, a second-rate military power. Remember:
1. They had the defensive advantage.
2. They had the numbers advantage.
3. It's not because they were nonviolent, since they actually managed to gather more men to fight and had the above numbers advantage.

Go ahead, explain.

Explain what? Having better weapons doesn't make you more advanced.

Oh, I see. Technology doesn't make one more advanced. Got it!

 

[IM2]

I am seeing smart blacks, and then I am seeing dumb blacks. And the huge crime rates. This is as a intellectual ploy by a few smart blacks /dumb whites to leverage being dumb and being gullible as being liberal. And "accepting" There is a fool born evey minute, says the late great Al Sharpton.

I .see huge rates of crime by whites that get ignored.

 

[IM2]

Again because they did not male weapons doesn't mean they were superior.

It's not that they didn't make weapons, it's that they couldn't make weapons. They also couldn't run a society that could acquire adequate weapons through trade.

And like I said this is just a show of how violent whites are.

It shows how smart whites are.

They were fighting in Ethiopia but did the Ethiopians decide they were going t invade and destroy another country? No. And that's the separator. Whites ate just extremely violent and more so than any other race. It's not like whites weren't fighting in Europe. So just face the fact, whites are violent, very violent.

Where do you think African slaves came from? They were captured and sold by other blacks. Blacks are quite violent. They were just too stupid to win. African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade

Here we go with that shit again. You really need to go study how this actually happened because I do know and for you to try pawning this disingenuous bullshit as fact just won't work here.

You said blacks were as advanced as whites prior to being colonized:

Which African nations were fine before colonization? Fine by what metric?
If they suck for the next 1000 years, is it still whitey's fault?

Every one of them. By all standard metrics.

So how does that explain how poorly they did in the war against Italy, a second-rate military power. Remember:
1. They had the defensive advantage.
2. They had the numbers advantage.
3. It's not because they were nonviolent, since they actually managed to gather more men to fight and had the above numbers advantage.

Go ahead, explain.

Explain what? Having better weapons doesn't make you more advanced.

Oh, I see. Technology doesn't make one more advanced. Got it!

Technology? There are other things that are far superior technological advancements than rifles. And really you need to go study .

The First Italo-Ethiopian War was fought between Italy and Ethiopia from 1895 to 1896. It originated from a disputed treaty which, the Italians claimed, turned the country into an Italian protectorate. Italy was supported by the two other triple alliance members Germany and Austria. Much to their surprise, they found that Ethiopian ruler Menelik II, rather than being opposed by some of his traditional enemies, was supported by them, so the Italian army, invading Ethiopia from Italian Eritrea in 1893, faced a more united front than they expected. In addition, Ethiopia was supported by Russia, an Orthodox Christian nation like Ethiopia[clarification needed] with military advisers, army training, and the sale of weapons for Ethiopian forces during the war. Ethiopia was also supported diplomatically by the United Kingdom and France in order to prevent Italy from becoming a colonial competitor.[6][7] Full-scale war broke out in 1895, with Italian troops having initial success until Ethiopian troops counterattacked Italian positions and besieged the Italian fort of Meqele, forcing its surrender. Italian defeat came about after the Battle of Adwa, where the Ethiopian army dealt the heavily outnumbered Italians a decisive blow and forced their retreat back into Eritrea.

First Italo-Ethiopian War - Wikipedia

The Italians broke a League of Nations Agreement in 1935 to invade Ethiopia for a second war since they got their asses whipped in the first one.

 

[bgrouse]

It's not that they didn't make weapons, it's that they couldn't make weapons. They also couldn't run a society that could acquire adequate weapons through trade. It shows how smart whites are.Where do you think African slaves came from? They were captured and sold by other blacks. Blacks are quite violent. They were just too stupid to win. African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade

Here we go with that shit again. You really need to go study how this actually happened because I do know and for you to try pawning this disingenuous bullshit as fact just won't work here.

You said blacks were as advanced as whites prior to being colonized:

Which African nations were fine before colonization? Fine by what metric?
If they suck for the next 1000 years, is it still whitey's fault?

Every one of them. By all standard metrics.

So how does that explain how poorly they did in the war against Italy, a second-rate military power. Remember:
1. They had the defensive advantage.
2. They had the numbers advantage.
3. It's not because they were nonviolent, since they actually managed to gather more men to fight and had the above numbers advantage.

Go ahead, explain.

Explain what? Having better weapons doesn't make you more advanced.

Oh, I see. Technology doesn't make one more advanced. Got it!

Technology? There are other things that are far superior technological advancements than rifles.

Why don't you tell us about all the technologies the Ethiopians had that the Italians didn't in that time period (1930-1938)?

And really you need to go study .

The First Italo-Ethiopian War was fought between Italy and Ethiopia from 1895 to 1896. It originated from a disputed treaty which, the Italians claimed, turned the country into an Italian protectorate. Italy was supported by the two other triple alliance members Germany and Austria. Much to their surprise, they found that Ethiopian ruler Menelik II, rather than being opposed by some of his traditional enemies, was supported by them, so the Italian army, invading Ethiopia from Italian Eritrea in 1893, faced a more united front than they expected. In addition, Ethiopia was supported by Russia, an Orthodox Christian nation like Ethiopia[clarification needed] with military advisers, army training, and the sale of weapons for Ethiopian forces during the war. Ethiopia was also supported diplomatically by the United Kingdom and France in order to prevent Italy from becoming a colonial competitor.[6][7] Full-scale war broke out in 1895, with Italian troops having initial success until Ethiopian troops counterattacked Italian positions and besieged the Italian fort of Meqele, forcing its surrender. Italian defeat came about after the Battle of Adwa, where the Ethiopian army dealt the heavily outnumbered Italians a decisive blow and forced their retreat back into Eritrea.

First Italo-Ethiopian War - Wikipedia

The Italians broke a League of Nations Agreement in 1935 to invade Ethiopia for a second war since they got their asses whipped in the first one.

Look at the army sizes:

Italy: 18,000-25,000
Ethiopia: 196,000

Italy still suffered fewer dead (15K vs 17K)!

So what's your point? That negroes can match or better whites if they have an 8:1 or greater advantage?

Then Italy came back with still inferior, but comparable numbers and flattened the negroes!

 

[TheParser]

I was very disappointed during the 2016 presidential campaign when Secretary Clinton referred to "white privilege."

In my opinion, in 2017 America, there is NO privilege for any one ethnicity.

To be very frank, there only exists "rich people's privilege."

Rich people of ALL ethnicities are insulated from the problems and dangers that are faced every day by NON-rich people of ALL ethnicities: getting a job at decent wages, finding a good school for their children, having enough money to live in a reasonably safe neighborhood, and avoiding being a victim of violent crime.

 

[IM2]

I was very disappointed during the 2016 presidential campaign when Secretary Clinton referred to "white privilege."

In my opinion, in 2017 America, there is NO privilege for any one ethnicity.

To be very frank, there only exists "rich people's privilege."

Rich people of ALL ethnicities are insulated from the problems and dangers that are faced every day by NON-rich people of ALL ethnicities: getting a job at decent wages, finding a good school for their children, having enough money to live in a reasonably safe neighborhood, and avoiding being a victim of violent crime.

When people talk about white privilege they aren't talking money. There is such a thing as white privilege and the term was coined by a white woman named Peggy McIntosh. Why not look up what she describes as white privilege before you comment. Whites families on average have 15 times the wealth of black and Hispanic families. So of you want to talk about money and wealth start there. Lets stop pretending that in 2017 certain things aren't true.

 

[IM2]

Here we go with that shit again. You really need to go study how this actually happened because I do know and for you to try pawning this disingenuous bullshit as fact just won't work here.

You said blacks were as advanced as whites prior to being colonized:

Which African nations were fine before colonization? Fine by what metric?
If they suck for the next 1000 years, is it still whitey's fault?

Every one of them. By all standard metrics.

So how does that explain how poorly they did in the war against Italy, a second-rate military power. Remember:
1. They had the defensive advantage.
2. They had the numbers advantage.
3. It's not because they were nonviolent, since they actually managed to gather more men to fight and had the above numbers advantage.

Go ahead, explain.

Explain what? Having better weapons doesn't make you more advanced.

Oh, I see. Technology doesn't make one more advanced. Got it!

Technology? There are other things that are far superior technological advancements than rifles.

Why don't you tell us about all the technologies the Ethiopians had that the Italians didn't in that time period (1930-1938)?

And really you need to go study .

The First Italo-Ethiopian War was fought between Italy and Ethiopia from 1895 to 1896. It originated from a disputed treaty which, the Italians claimed, turned the country into an Italian protectorate. Italy was supported by the two other triple alliance members Germany and Austria. Much to their surprise, they found that Ethiopian ruler Menelik II, rather than being opposed by some of his traditional enemies, was supported by them, so the Italian army, invading Ethiopia from Italian Eritrea in 1893, faced a more united front than they expected. In addition, Ethiopia was supported by Russia, an Orthodox Christian nation like Ethiopia[clarification needed] with military advisers, army training, and the sale of weapons for Ethiopian forces during the war. Ethiopia was also supported diplomatically by the United Kingdom and France in order to prevent Italy from becoming a colonial competitor.[6][7] Full-scale war broke out in 1895, with Italian troops having initial success until Ethiopian troops counterattacked Italian positions and besieged the Italian fort of Meqele, forcing its surrender. Italian defeat came about after the Battle of Adwa, where the Ethiopian army dealt the heavily outnumbered Italians a decisive blow and forced their retreat back into Eritrea.

First Italo-Ethiopian War - Wikipedia

The Italians broke a League of Nations Agreement in 1935 to invade Ethiopia for a second war since they got their asses whipped in the first one.

Look at the army sizes:

Italy: 18,000-25,000
Ethiopia: 196,000

Italy still suffered fewer dead (15K vs 17K)!

So what's your point? That negroes can match or better whites if they have an 8:1 or greater advantage?

Then Italy came back with still inferior, but comparable numbers and flattened the negroes!

Whitey got his ass kicked punk. .Now you want to cry about army sizes. Just yesterday your punk ass was bragging about the superior white man beating the black Ethiopians when the Ethiopians had a advantage My point is that whitey got his ass kicked in Africa and that your claim of white supremacy is a fantasy which has been shown to you once again. Take your beating like a man,

 

[bgrouse]

You said blacks were as advanced as whites prior to being colonized:

Which African nations were fine before colonization? Fine by what metric?
If they suck for the next 1000 years, is it still whitey's fault?

Every one of them. By all standard metrics.

So how does that explain how poorly they did in the war against Italy, a second-rate military power. Remember:
1. They had the defensive advantage.
2. They had the numbers advantage.
3. It's not because they were nonviolent, since they actually managed to gather more men to fight and had the above numbers advantage.

Go ahead, explain.

Explain what? Having better weapons doesn't make you more advanced.

Oh, I see. Technology doesn't make one more advanced. Got it!

Technology? There are other things that are far superior technological advancements than rifles.

Why don't you tell us about all the technologies the Ethiopians had that the Italians didn't in that time period (1930-1938)?

And really you need to go study .

The First Italo-Ethiopian War was fought between Italy and Ethiopia from 1895 to 1896. It originated from a disputed treaty which, the Italians claimed, turned the country into an Italian protectorate. Italy was supported by the two other triple alliance members Germany and Austria. Much to their surprise, they found that Ethiopian ruler Menelik II, rather than being opposed by some of his traditional enemies, was supported by them, so the Italian army, invading Ethiopia from Italian Eritrea in 1893, faced a more united front than they expected. In addition, Ethiopia was supported by Russia, an Orthodox Christian nation like Ethiopia[clarification needed] with military advisers, army training, and the sale of weapons for Ethiopian forces during the war. Ethiopia was also supported diplomatically by the United Kingdom and France in order to prevent Italy from becoming a colonial competitor.[6][7] Full-scale war broke out in 1895, with Italian troops having initial success until Ethiopian troops counterattacked Italian positions and besieged the Italian fort of Meqele, forcing its surrender. Italian defeat came about after the Battle of Adwa, where the Ethiopian army dealt the heavily outnumbered Italians a decisive blow and forced their retreat back into Eritrea.

First Italo-Ethiopian War - Wikipedia

The Italians broke a League of Nations Agreement in 1935 to invade Ethiopia for a second war since they got their asses whipped in the first one.

Look at the army sizes:

Italy: 18,000-25,000
Ethiopia: 196,000

Italy still suffered fewer dead (15K vs 17K)!

So what's your point? That negroes can match or better whites if they have an 8:1 or greater advantage?

Then Italy came back with still inferior, but comparable numbers and flattened the negroes!

Whitey got his ass kicked punk. .Now you want to cry about army sizes. Just yesterday your punk ass was bragging about the superior white man beating the black Ethiopians when the Ethiopians had a advantage My point is that whitey got his ass kicked in Africa and that your claim of white supremacy is a fantasy which has been shown to you once again. Take your beating like a man,

Fact: all of Africa got it's ass kicked by whitey. That's how they got colonized. The negroes are utter failures, just like you, and the fact that 8 negroes managed to beat 1 Italian doesn't change that.

 

[Correll]

Maine Democrats Laugh About Rising Suicide Rates Among White Males [VIDEO]


"The video shows Fochtmann tell the crowd at a “Values and Vision” community meeting about how the Democratic Party needs more “young people” and “more women.”


“Today, you know, I saw a [inaudible] that said a lot of men, white men are committing suicide,” he continued. “I almost thought yeah, great.” "



"When asked about his remark, Fochtmann told The Daily Caller “a joke’s a joke isn’t it?” "

 

[IM2]

Explain what? Having better weapons doesn't make you more advanced.

Oh, I see. Technology doesn't make one more advanced. Got it!

Technology? There are other things that are far superior technological advancements than rifles.

Why don't you tell us about all the technologies the Ethiopians had that the Italians didn't in that time period (1930-1938)?

And really you need to go study .

The First Italo-Ethiopian War was fought between Italy and Ethiopia from 1895 to 1896. It originated from a disputed treaty which, the Italians claimed, turned the country into an Italian protectorate. Italy was supported by the two other triple alliance members Germany and Austria. Much to their surprise, they found that Ethiopian ruler Menelik II, rather than being opposed by some of his traditional enemies, was supported by them, so the Italian army, invading Ethiopia from Italian Eritrea in 1893, faced a more united front than they expected. In addition, Ethiopia was supported by Russia, an Orthodox Christian nation like Ethiopia[clarification needed] with military advisers, army training, and the sale of weapons for Ethiopian forces during the war. Ethiopia was also supported diplomatically by the United Kingdom and France in order to prevent Italy from becoming a colonial competitor.[6][7] Full-scale war broke out in 1895, with Italian troops having initial success until Ethiopian troops counterattacked Italian positions and besieged the Italian fort of Meqele, forcing its surrender. Italian defeat came about after the Battle of Adwa, where the Ethiopian army dealt the heavily outnumbered Italians a decisive blow and forced their retreat back into Eritrea.

First Italo-Ethiopian War - Wikipedia

The Italians broke a League of Nations Agreement in 1935 to invade Ethiopia for a second war since they got their asses whipped in the first one.

Look at the army sizes:

Italy: 18,000-25,000
Ethiopia: 196,000

Italy still suffered fewer dead (15K vs 17K)!

So what's your point? That negroes can match or better whites if they have an 8:1 or greater advantage?

Then Italy came back with still inferior, but comparable numbers and flattened the negroes!

Whitey got his ass kicked punk. .Now you want to cry about army sizes. Just yesterday your punk ass was bragging about the superior white man beating the black Ethiopians when the Ethiopians had a advantage My point is that whitey got his ass kicked in Africa and that your claim of white supremacy is a fantasy which has been shown to you once again. Take your beating like a man,

Fact: all of Africa got it's ass kicked by whitey. That's how they got colonized. The negroes are utter failures, just like you, and the fact that 8 negroes managed to beat 1 Italian doesn't change that.

I already know: negroes are stupid. It's at least partly genetic.

Did you ask this?

You show me where they we not fine before colonization.

Well, it happened in the Ethiopia-Italy war. Ethiopia had not been colonized. The Italians were outnumbered AND were the attackers, so the Ethiopians had a defensive bonus. The results were pretty pathetic for Ethiopia. Honestly, despite Italy being a second-rate European power, the casualties made it look like the Ethiopians were fighting with sticks and stones! They actually did have some rifles (presumably whatever the whites gave to them).

This is what you said loser. And you spent all the day bragging about it. But as we see the whitey got his ass kicked. And you can stop crying about 8:1 because whitey decided to invade a nation where they were outnumbered. So if you walk into a situation where you are outnumbered 8:1 and start a fight and get your ass kicked, that's your own stupidity.

Now you go study colonization dumb white boy, because once you do. you understand that everything you said about whites kicking somebody's ass is not so.

Just like white supremacy is not so.

 

[LOIE]

Whites are just more effective with their violence thanks to their intellects

People are more than just intellect. They have souls and spirits. If we concentrated on them instead of intellect, perhaps we would not be prone to so much violence.

 

[LOIE]

No they don't.

Don't what? Commit crimes are lesser rates?

Whites commit the most crimes.

It's the rate that's important, not the total crimes. Like I said before, I prefer that car that has a 1% chance of failing vs the car that has a 60% chance of failing. I don't care how many in total failed. I care how many in total failed divided by the total number in use (the failure rate).

Actually it's the totals that count. .70 percent of all crimes are committed by whites. We aren't talking about failing cars. We are talking about crime. .And whites commit more of them.

You can believe whatever you want to keep your delusions sustainable for yourself. The truth is in Africa, which is a shithole, so we know which color is better.

I find it interesting that no matter where the conversation starts, you always bring it around to Africa and your perception of that continent.

 

[LOIE]

Again because they did not male weapons doesn't mean they were superior.

It's not that they didn't make weapons, it's that they couldn't make weapons. They also couldn't run a society that could acquire adequate weapons through trade.

And like I said this is just a show of how violent whites are.

It shows how smart whites are.

They were fighting in Ethiopia but did the Ethiopians decide they were going t invade and destroy another country? No. And that's the separator. Whites ate just extremely violent and more so than any other race. It's not like whites weren't fighting in Europe. So just face the fact, whites are violent, very violent.

Where do you think African slaves came from? They were captured and sold by other blacks. Blacks are quite violent. They were just too stupid to win. African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade

Here we go with that shit again. You really need to go study how this actually happened because I do know and for you to try pawning this disingenuous bullshit as fact just won't work here.

You said blacks were as advanced as whites prior to being colonized:

Which African nations were fine before colonization? Fine by what metric?
If they suck for the next 1000 years, is it still whitey's fault?

Every one of them. By all standard metrics.

So how does that explain how poorly they did in the war against Italy, a second-rate military power. Remember:
1. They had the defensive advantage.
2. They had the numbers advantage.
3. It's not because they were nonviolent, since they actually managed to gather more men to fight and had the above numbers advantage.

Go ahead, explain.

Explain what? Having better weapons doesn't make you more advanced.

Oh, I see. Technology doesn't make one more advanced. Got it!

I would sTE="bgrouse, post: 18744371, member: 65206"]

Again because they did not male weapons doesn't mean they were superior.

It's not that they didn't make weapons, it's that they couldn't make weapons. They also couldn't run a society that could acquire adequate weapons through trade.

And like I said this is just a show of how violent whites are.

It shows how smart whites are.

They were fighting in Ethiopia but did the Ethiopians decide they were going t invade and destroy another country? No. And that's the separator. Whites ate just extremely violent and more so than any other race. It's not like whites weren't fighting in Europe. So just face the fact, whites are violent, very violent.

Where do you think African slaves came from? They were captured and sold by other blacks. Blacks are quite violent. They were just too stupid to win. African chiefs urged to apologise for slave trade

Here we go with that shit again. You really need to go study how this actually happened because I do know and for you to try pawning this disingenuous bullshit as fact just won't work here.

You said blacks were as advanced as whites prior to being colonized:

Which African nations were fine before colonization? Fine by what metric?
If they suck for the next 1000 years, is it still whitey's fault?

Every one of them. By all standard metrics.

So how does that explain how poorly they did in the war against Italy, a second-rate military power. Remember:
1. They had the defensive advantage.
2. They had the numbers advantage.
3. It's not because they were nonviolent, since they actually managed to gather more men to fight and had the above numbers advantage.

Go ahead, explain.

Explain what? Having better weapons doesn't make you more advanced.

Oh, I see. Technology doesn't make one more advanced. Got it![/QUOT

Oh, I see. Technology doesn't make one more advanced. Got it!

I think that how you choose to use your knowledge and technology says a lot more about you than the fact that you have it.

 

[rightwinger]

Maine Democrats Laugh About Rising Suicide Rates Among White Males [VIDEO]


"The video shows Fochtmann tell the crowd at a “Values and Vision” community meeting about how the Democratic Party needs more “young people” and “more women.”


“Today, you know, I saw a [inaudible] that said a lot of men, white men are committing suicide,” he continued. “I almost thought yeah, great.” "



"When asked about his remark, Fochtmann told The Daily Caller “a joke’s a joke isn’t it?” "

White males have it so tough in our society
Good thing they have you protecting them

 

[Peach]

Monogenism is the prevailing science, polygenism died out with Agassiz; obviously humans are one species, thus intraracial humans.

 

[Correll]

Maine Democrats Laugh About Rising Suicide Rates Among White Males [VIDEO]


"The video shows Fochtmann tell the crowd at a “Values and Vision” community meeting about how the Democratic Party needs more “young people” and “more women.”


“Today, you know, I saw a [inaudible] that said a lot of men, white men are committing suicide,” he continued. “I almost thought yeah, great.” "



"When asked about his remark, Fochtmann told The Daily Caller “a joke’s a joke isn’t it?” "

White males have it so tough in our society
Good thing they have you protecting them

THe difference between our posts is that yours is a collection of strawmen and stereotypes while mine is a real world video of a democratic candidate laughing at the idea of white suicides and the room full of mass. dems laughing with him.


You respond to that by ridiculing the idea that whites have it tough in our society. WHile you well know that white life spans are dropping due to economic hardship.


You really need to think about where you are at, and what it says about you as a person.

 

[IM2]

Maine Democrats Laugh About Rising Suicide Rates Among White Males [VIDEO]


"The video shows Fochtmann tell the crowd at a “Values and Vision” community meeting about how the Democratic Party needs more “young people” and “more women.”


“Today, you know, I saw a [inaudible] that said a lot of men, white men are committing suicide,” he continued. “I almost thought yeah, great.” "



"When asked about his remark, Fochtmann told The Daily Caller “a joke’s a joke isn’t it?” "

White males have it so tough in our society
Good thing they have you protecting them

THe difference between our posts is that yours is a collection of strawmen and stereotypes while mine is a real world video of a democratic candidate laughing at the idea of white suicides and the room full of mass. dems laughing with him.


You respond to that by ridiculing the idea that whites have it tough in our society. WHile you well know that white life spans are dropping due to economic hardship.


You really need to think about where you are at, and what it says about you as a person.

You are the only on here building strawmen.

 

[Correll]

Maine Democrats Laugh About Rising Suicide Rates Among White Males [VIDEO]


"The video shows Fochtmann tell the crowd at a “Values and Vision” community meeting about how the Democratic Party needs more “young people” and “more women.”


“Today, you know, I saw a [inaudible] that said a lot of men, white men are committing suicide,” he continued. “I almost thought yeah, great.” "



"When asked about his remark, Fochtmann told The Daily Caller “a joke’s a joke isn’t it?” "

White males have it so tough in our society
Good thing they have you protecting them

THe difference between our posts is that yours is a collection of strawmen and stereotypes while mine is a real world video of a democratic candidate laughing at the idea of white suicides and the room full of mass. dems laughing with him.


You respond to that by ridiculing the idea that whites have it tough in our society. WHile you well know that white life spans are dropping due to economic hardship.


You really need to think about where you are at, and what it says about you as a person.

You are the only on here building strawmen.

Says the professor who pretends to not understand grade school math.

 

[IM2]

Maine Democrats Laugh About Rising Suicide Rates Among White Males [VIDEO]


"The video shows Fochtmann tell the crowd at a “Values and Vision” community meeting about how the Democratic Party needs more “young people” and “more women.”


“Today, you know, I saw a [inaudible] that said a lot of men, white men are committing suicide,” he continued. “I almost thought yeah, great.” "



"When asked about his remark, Fochtmann told The Daily Caller “a joke’s a joke isn’t it?” "

White males have it so tough in our society
Good thing they have you protecting them

THe difference between our posts is that yours is a collection of strawmen and stereotypes while mine is a real world video of a democratic candidate laughing at the idea of white suicides and the room full of mass. dems laughing with him.


You respond to that by ridiculing the idea that whites have it tough in our society. WHile you well know that white life spans are dropping due to economic hardship.


You really need to think about where you are at, and what it says about you as a person.

You are the only on here building strawmen.

Says the professor who pretends to not understand grade school math.

I'm not a professor and I'm not the one with the problem understanding math.

You seem to have a overall problem understanding real life and reality in general.