Comrade Trump Jr. compares Syrian Refugees to Skittles

[Toddsterpatriot]

Russia has never loved the US. They haven't been your friends since the Bolsheviks came to power. They are currently interfering in your election which is abhorrent, and they seem to want Trump to be elected. That's not a good sign.

It's amazing that Julian Assange has gone from being vilified by right wingers as the Anti-Christ for releasing state secrets, to being a hero for releasing Hillary's emails. Anyone could have filed an information request and obtained these emails themselves. And once again, there is no there in there. No smoking gun, no state secrets, no endangering the public safety. Just a Secretary of State who cares about her country, her constituents, and her staff, and who gets things done.

Russia has never loved the US.

So why were Hillary and Obama both sucking up to Putin?
Why didn't Putin return their love?

being a hero for releasing Hillary's emails. Anyone could have filed an information request and obtained these emails themselves.

Ummmm....the emails she deleted. Hard to file a request for stuff she illegally hid.

 

[Correll]

Bullshit sophism.

YOu know that increasing the size of the muslim population will increase terrorism, yet you support it anyway.

Your meme demonstrates that you are looking at this as the odds of personal danger to YOURSELF.



Trump Jr's meme demonstrates that he is looking at this as the odds of personal danger to any single fellow American.

The odds to any single American are extremely remote. There are more deaths from accidental shootings by children than by terrorists

You are blind to my point.

You are judging this issue from the mindset of someone who is ok with a policy if SOMEONE ELSE FAR AWAY GET HURT.


Trump, Trump jr, and Me, are not ok with that.

THe odds that some Americans will be killed in increased terrorism is 100%.

And tens of thousand of lives will be saved

Americans are not cowards like you....we do the right thing

Putting our women and children in unnecessary danger is not the right thing.


It is not cowardice to NOT want to do that.

It is not bravery to Want to do that.

 

[Correll]

Your meme demonstrates that you are looking at this as the odds of personal danger to YOURSELF.



Trump Jr's meme demonstrates that he is looking at this as the odds of personal danger to any single fellow American.

The odds to any single American are extremely remote. There are more deaths from accidental shootings by children than by terrorists

You are blind to my point.

You are judging this issue from the mindset of someone who is ok with a policy if SOMEONE ELSE FAR AWAY GET HURT.


Trump, Trump jr, and Me, are not ok with that.

THe odds that some Americans will be killed in increased terrorism is 100%.

And tens of thousand of lives will be saved

Americans are not cowards like you....we do the right thing

We can put the skittles in bowls much closer the their homes.
So that we can send the skittles home, soon, because Obama fixed Syria. Right?
I mean after he totally fucked it up and sent the skittles flying.

What makes you think Syria will ever be "fixed"?

Your refugee camps will be nothing but concentration camps

If you can't tell a refugee camp from a concentration camp, you are doing it wrong.

 

[Correll]

Russia has never loved the US. They haven't been your friends since the Bolsheviks came to power. They are currently interfering in your election which is abhorrent, and they seem to want Trump to be elected. That's not a good sign.

It's amazing that Julian Assange has gone from being vilified by right wingers as the Anti-Christ for releasing state secrets, to being a hero for releasing Hillary's emails. Anyone could have filed an information request and obtained these emails themselves. And once again, there is no there in there. No smoking gun, no state secrets, no endangering the public safety. Just a Secretary of State who cares about her country, her constituents, and her staff, and who gets things done.

Russia didn't hate US after the communist lost power. They thought the Cold War was over. Like I did.


We had to start ******* with them again to bring back the bad old days.

 

[Correll]

We can put the skittles in bowls much closer the their homes.
So that we can send the skittles home, soon, because Obama fixed Syria. Right?
I mean after he totally fucked it up and sent the skittles flying.

Syria isn't going to be "fixed" any time soon. And Obama didn't "**** it up". Assad did.

You have an opportunity which happens so rarely. To be the country you claim to be. To do the Christian thing, the right thing. The refugees will be forever grateful for the chance.

Instead you want to hide behind Islamophobia, and fear. That is not the mark of a great nation.

We have been taking in refugees, and we have been taking in tens of millions of immigrants.


And where is all that respect that you are implying should be coming our way?


And how have those refugees and immigrants worked out for US?

 

[Correll]

Trumps "skittles"

Even when you take out the self-inflicted poison Skittles (suicides), you are left with nearly 13,000 poison Skittles (gun homicides) in your bowl.

That's a LOT of poison Skittles!

Which in no way has anything to do with the topic.

No one is saying we can't address crime because we have to address refugees.

 

[Correll]

We've witnessed all this before:

MS St. Louis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The MS St. Louis was a German ocean liner most notable for a single voyage in 1939, in which its captain, Gustav Schröder, tried to find homes for 908 Jewish refugees from Germany. After they were denied entry to Cuba, Canada, and the United States, the refugees were finally accepted in various European countries, and historians have estimated that approximately a quarter of them died in death camps during World War II."

Some of us would not want something like this on our conscience. Others don't
have a conscious.

If you wanted the US to be open to refugees, your filthy dems should not have spent the last 50 years importing tens of millions of Third World Immigrants into the US, exhausting our enormous, but not infinite generosity.

I only imported 6 immigrants. Customs told me that I would have to pay a duty if I imported more than that.

Ha ha ha.

My point stands.


If you wanted the US to be open to refugees, your filthy dems should not have spent the last 50 years importing tens of millions of Third World Immigrants into the US, exhausting our enormous, but not infinite generosity.

 

[Correll]

We can put the skittles in bowls much closer the their homes.
So that we can send the skittles home, soon, because Obama fixed Syria. Right?
I mean after he totally fucked it up and sent the skittles flying.

Syria isn't going to be "fixed" any time soon. And Obama didn't "**** it up". Assad did.

You have an opportunity which happens so rarely. To be the country you claim to be. To do the Christian thing, the right thing. The refugees will be forever grateful for the chance.

Instead you want to hide behind Islamophobia, and fear. That is not the mark of a great nation.

And Obama didn't "**** it up".

It was fine when he took office.

You have an opportunity which happens so rarely. To be the country you claim to be.

This is America, we don't need any more unskilled savages.

The refugees will be forever grateful for the chance.

Yeah, the Muslims invading Europe have shown a lot of gratitude.
How's Malmo, Marseille and Molenbeek after dark?
Full of grateful Muslims?

 

[Correll]

RW, you cited the opinion of Mexico as proof that Trump was being racist when he attacked illegal immigrants.

I asked you why you considered the people of Mexico an authority on what Trump was thinking inside of his head, as opposed to, say someone who shared his views, like myself.


You did not answer. That was not a rhetorical question.


You seem to be leaning towards that insane lefty idea that the intent of the person saying or doing something is not what defines what they say or do, BUT, the way it makes some one else feel, IF THAT PERSON is a member of a traditionally disadvantaged group.


If that is not what you were suggesting, please explain to me what your actual reasons for that were.

 

[rightwinger]

Your meme demonstrates that you are looking at this as the odds of personal danger to YOURSELF.



Trump Jr's meme demonstrates that he is looking at this as the odds of personal danger to any single fellow American.

The odds to any single American are extremely remote. There are more deaths from accidental shootings by children than by terrorists

You are blind to my point.

You are judging this issue from the mindset of someone who is ok with a policy if SOMEONE ELSE FAR AWAY GET HURT.


Trump, Trump jr, and Me, are not ok with that.

THe odds that some Americans will be killed in increased terrorism is 100%.

And tens of thousand of lives will be saved

Americans are not cowards like you....we do the right thing

Putting our women and children in unnecessary danger is not the right thing.


It is not cowardice to NOT want to do that.

It is not bravery to Want to do that.

Save us your drama

Our women and children are in greater danger from some meth head or gang banger than terrorist attack

Yet, you are unwilling to do anything about it

 

[rightwinger]

RW, you cited the opinion of Mexico as proof that Trump was being racist when he attacked illegal immigrants.

I asked you why you considered the people of Mexico an authority on what Trump was thinking inside of his head, as opposed to, say someone who shared his views, like myself.


You did not answer. That was not a rhetorical question.


You seem to be leaning towards that insane lefty idea that the intent of the person saying or doing something is not what defines what they say or do, BUT, the way it makes some one else feel, IF THAT PERSON is a member of a traditionally disadvantaged group.


If that is not what you were suggesting, please explain to me what your actual reasons for that were.

All Mexico knows is what they hear

What they hear from Trump is ignorance, hatred and bigotry

 

[Redfish]

RW, you cited the opinion of Mexico as proof that Trump was being racist when he attacked illegal immigrants.

I asked you why you considered the people of Mexico an authority on what Trump was thinking inside of his head, as opposed to, say someone who shared his views, like myself.


You did not answer. That was not a rhetorical question.


You seem to be leaning towards that insane lefty idea that the intent of the person saying or doing something is not what defines what they say or do, BUT, the way it makes some one else feel, IF THAT PERSON is a member of a traditionally disadvantaged group.


If that is not what you were suggesting, please explain to me what your actual reasons for that were.

All Mexico knows is what they hear

What they hear from Trump is ignorance, hatred and bigotry

bullshit, what they hear is common sense, border security, and enforcing our laws.

Every other country in the world secures its borders, why don't you libs want our borders secure?

BTW, the skittles thing was an analogy, why is it that liberals don't understand analogies?

 

[rightwinger]

RW, you cited the opinion of Mexico as proof that Trump was being racist when he attacked illegal immigrants.

I asked you why you considered the people of Mexico an authority on what Trump was thinking inside of his head, as opposed to, say someone who shared his views, like myself.


You did not answer. That was not a rhetorical question.


You seem to be leaning towards that insane lefty idea that the intent of the person saying or doing something is not what defines what they say or do, BUT, the way it makes some one else feel, IF THAT PERSON is a member of a traditionally disadvantaged group.


If that is not what you were suggesting, please explain to me what your actual reasons for that were.

All Mexico knows is what they hear

What they hear from Trump is ignorance, hatred and bigotry

bullshit, what they hear is common sense, border security, and enforcing our laws.

Every other country in the world secures its borders, why don't you libs want our borders secure?

BTW, the skittles thing was an analogy, why is it that liberals don't understand analogies?

What they heard was that their government was intentionally sending mrderers, rapists and drug dealers across the border.

We are very inowlegeable about analogies. We understand the implications of Trumps callous analogy

 

[Vandalshandle]

We've witnessed all this before:

MS St. Louis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The MS St. Louis was a German ocean liner most notable for a single voyage in 1939, in which its captain, Gustav Schröder, tried to find homes for 908 Jewish refugees from Germany. After they were denied entry to Cuba, Canada, and the United States, the refugees were finally accepted in various European countries, and historians have estimated that approximately a quarter of them died in death camps during World War II."

Some of us would not want something like this on our conscience. Others don't
have a conscious.

If you wanted the US to be open to refugees, your filthy dems should not have spent the last 50 years importing tens of millions of Third World Immigrants into the US, exhausting our enormous, but not infinite generosity.

I only imported 6 immigrants. Customs told me that I would have to pay a duty if I imported more than that.

Ha ha ha.

My point stands.


If you wanted the US to be open to refugees, your filthy dems should not have spent the last 50 years importing tens of millions of Third World Immigrants into the US, exhausting our enormous, but not infinite generosity.

Ok. I'll send back 3 Vietnamese, and take in three Syrians.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

We've witnessed all this before:

MS St. Louis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The MS St. Louis was a German ocean liner most notable for a single voyage in 1939, in which its captain, Gustav Schröder, tried to find homes for 908 Jewish refugees from Germany. After they were denied entry to Cuba, Canada, and the United States, the refugees were finally accepted in various European countries, and historians have estimated that approximately a quarter of them died in death camps during World War II."

Some of us would not want something like this on our conscience. Others don't
have a conscious.

If you wanted the US to be open to refugees, your filthy dems should not have spent the last 50 years importing tens of millions of Third World Immigrants into the US, exhausting our enormous, but not infinite generosity.

I only imported 6 immigrants. Customs told me that I would have to pay a duty if I imported more than that.

Ha ha ha.

My point stands.


If you wanted the US to be open to refugees, your filthy dems should not have spent the last 50 years importing tens of millions of Third World Immigrants into the US, exhausting our enormous, but not infinite generosity.

Ok. I'll send back 3 Vietnamese, and take in three Syrians.

Frigg'n racist.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

RW, you cited the opinion of Mexico as proof that Trump was being racist when he attacked illegal immigrants.

I asked you why you considered the people of Mexico an authority on what Trump was thinking inside of his head, as opposed to, say someone who shared his views, like myself.


You did not answer. That was not a rhetorical question.


You seem to be leaning towards that insane lefty idea that the intent of the person saying or doing something is not what defines what they say or do, BUT, the way it makes some one else feel, IF THAT PERSON is a member of a traditionally disadvantaged group.


If that is not what you were suggesting, please explain to me what your actual reasons for that were.

All Mexico knows is what they hear

What they hear from Trump is ignorance, hatred and bigotry

bullshit, what they hear is common sense, border security, and enforcing our laws.

Every other country in the world secures its borders, why don't you libs want our borders secure?

BTW, the skittles thing was an analogy, why is it that liberals don't understand analogies?

They understand precious little.

 

[g5000]

Trumps "skittles"

Even when you take out the self-inflicted poison Skittles (suicides), you are left with nearly 13,000 poison Skittles (gun homicides) in your bowl.

That's a LOT of poison Skittles!

Which in no way has anything to do with the topic.

It demonstrates the fallacy of the Skittles analogy. None of you bigots has been able to explain the difference between swimming pools Skittles, gun owner Skittles, and Syrian refugee Skittles.

It must chafe your ass that there are far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far more poisonous gun owner Skittles, eh?

 

[Correll]

Your meme demonstrates that you are looking at this as the odds of personal danger to YOURSELF.



Trump Jr's meme demonstrates that he is looking at this as the odds of personal danger to any single fellow American.

The odds to any single American are extremely remote. There are more deaths from accidental shootings by children than by terrorists

You are blind to my point.

You are judging this issue from the mindset of someone who is ok with a policy if SOMEONE ELSE FAR AWAY GET HURT.


Trump, Trump jr, and Me, are not ok with that.

THe odds that some Americans will be killed in increased terrorism is 100%.

And tens of thousand of lives will be saved

Americans are not cowards like you....we do the right thing

Putting our women and children in unnecessary danger is not the right thing.


It is not cowardice to NOT want to do that.

It is not bravery to Want to do that.

Save us your drama

Our women and children are in greater danger from some meth head or gang banger than terrorist attack

Yet, you are unwilling to do anything about it

What do you base that odd belief on?


AND, as I have repeatedly said, the present of an internal danger is no reason to import an additional danger.

 

[Correll]

Trumps "skittles"

Even when you take out the self-inflicted poison Skittles (suicides), you are left with nearly 13,000 poison Skittles (gun homicides) in your bowl.

That's a LOT of poison Skittles!

Which in no way has anything to do with the topic.

It demonstrates the fallacy of the Skittles analogy. None of you bigots has been able to explain the difference between swimming pools Skittles, gun owner Skittles, and Syrian refugee Skittles.

It must chafe your ass that there are far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far more poisonous gun owner Skittles, eh?

Two standard lib oddities.

YOu really believe that if you disagree with an answer, than that answer did not exist.


And you constantly assume that your belief system is the only possible belief system and then judge other people as though they share YOUR beliefs and thus are being wrong as their actions don't match what you believe to be their internal belief system.




Both tie in to the completely closed lib mind.

 

[Correll]

RW, you cited the opinion of Mexico as proof that Trump was being racist when he attacked illegal immigrants.

I asked you why you considered the people of Mexico an authority on what Trump was thinking inside of his head, as opposed to, say someone who shared his views, like myself.


You did not answer. That was not a rhetorical question.


You seem to be leaning towards that insane lefty idea that the intent of the person saying or doing something is not what defines what they say or do, BUT, the way it makes some one else feel, IF THAT PERSON is a member of a traditionally disadvantaged group.


If that is not what you were suggesting, please explain to me what your actual reasons for that were.

All Mexico knows is what they hear

What they hear from Trump is ignorance, hatred and bigotry

Yes. We covered that. They believe that Trump is being racist.


But I asked you WHY do you consider them an Authority on what Trump is/was thinking?


Because you are citing them like they are.


Would not someone who SHARED Trump's opinion on the topic be a better source for what is the reason and/or motivation for a policy?

Like me?

Oh, and I am giving you a pass on the PIcard Race Card meme, even thought you were asking for it. I hope you appreciate the special treatment you are getting.