Computer repairman who claimed to have Hunter's laptop Closes Shop

[Faun]

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

 

[Nostra]

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

 

[Faun]

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

 

[Nostra]

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

 

[Faun]

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

LOL

Nobody is. That makes you a liar.

 

[Nostra]

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

LOL

Nobody is. That makes you a liar.

I am. Sux to be you, Cupcake.

 

[Faun]

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

LOL

Nobody is. That makes you a liar.

I am. Sux to be you, Cupcake.

LOL

You already admitted you're a liar and you think that sucks for me?

 

[Nostra]

I

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

LOL

Nobody is. That makes you a liar.

I am. Sux to be you, Cupcake.

LOL

You already admitted you're a liar and you think that sucks for me?

I did no such thing, Buttercup.

 

[Faun]

I

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

LOL

Nobody is. That makes you a liar.

I am. Sux to be you, Cupcake.

LOL

You already admitted you're a liar and you think that sucks for me?

I did no such thing, Buttercup.

LOLOL

Sure, liar, keep telling yourself that.

 

[Nostra]

I

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

LOL

Nobody is. That makes you a liar.

I am. Sux to be you, Cupcake.

LOL

You already admitted you're a liar and you think that sucks for me?

I did no such thing, Buttercup.

LOLOL

Sure, liar, keep telling yourself that.

You are incorrect, as usual.

 

[Faun]

I

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

LOL

Nobody is. That makes you a liar.

I am. Sux to be you, Cupcake.

LOL

You already admitted you're a liar and you think that sucks for me?

I did no such thing, Buttercup.

LOLOL

Sure, liar, keep telling yourself that.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

Sure, liar, keep telling yourself that.

 

[Nostra]

I

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

LOL

Nobody is. That makes you a liar.

I am. Sux to be you, Cupcake.

LOL

You already admitted you're a liar and you think that sucks for me?

I did no such thing, Buttercup.

LOLOL

Sure, liar, keep telling yourself that.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

Sure, liar, keep telling yourself that.

Once again, you are incorrect.

 

[Faun]

I

What source have I used in this thread?

LOLOL

Exactly.

I haven't needed one, Fawnboi.

All I have done is point out what a hack his source is.

And you failed miserably as the WSJ and Shokin himself confirmed the Bloomberg article.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

So you say with nothing to back you up other than you merely saying it. And to to even that, you have to indicate Shokin himself was lying when he himself said he was planning on investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

Says no one but you. And you're delirious.

You are incorrect, as usual.

Says you, quoting you.

And I am correct, as always.

LOL

Nobody is. That makes you a liar.

I am. Sux to be you, Cupcake.

LOL

You already admitted you're a liar and you think that sucks for me?

I did no such thing, Buttercup.

LOLOL

Sure, liar, keep telling yourself that.

You are incorrect, as usual.

LOLOL

Sure, liar, keep telling yourself that.

Once again, you are incorrect.

LOLOL

Sure, liar, keep telling yourself that.

 

[Nostra]

Poor Fawnboi, just can’t gat anything right.

 

[Faun]

Poor Fawnboi, just can’t gat anything right.

Poor Pinocchio ^^^ still gurgling, derpity derp derp.

 

[Nostra]

 

[Andylusion]

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

Nah, Trump did in fact lose. All of the bad votes added together in any state, is not nearly enough to change the outcome. He did in fact lose the election.

The way he lost, is still because of lies and evil in the media, and a failure of Americans to care about truth.

But they did in fact vote for that openly corrupt Biden. So... it is what it is.

Not giving up yet. It matters not how many votes if the election was fraudulent, because who knows how deep the fraud went

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

LOLOL

Yes, he lost. All of the swing states have certified their respective elections.

Biden officially has enough electoral college votes to win the presidency after California became the latest state to certify its election results

California's 55 electors put Biden over the 270 electoral college votes needed to win, while Trump continues to contest the election in court.

www.businessinsider.com

Certification means nothing if the election is over turned. Trust me when I say that their are literally hundreds of thousands of citizen's praying this bullcrap election is overturned. Biden and Harris are losers.. They have just benefitted temporarily from a criminally run election by the deep state.

Who cares what you pray for? Biden won. Trump lost. The sooner you accept reality the better off you'll be. Or let it eat away at you for the rest of your life. No skin off my back.

I'm not hundreds of thousands of voters, but I'm only one of the hundreds of thousands across this nation who are praying for Trump to prevail, and justice to win the day.

No skin off my back upon what you think either.

LOL

A million people can pray for that. It's over. Enough states have certified their respective elections to give Biden the win. No state is going to tell a majority of their voters ... we counted your votes and Biden won... we canvassed your votes and Biden won... we certified your votes and Biden won... but fuck you and your votes, we're giving our electoral votes to Trump.

It's over, you lost. Deal with it, loser.

It doesn't matter, because if it was a fraudulent election, then it is null and voided. A do over is either nessesary or Trump wins because if the amount of fraud and illegal votes counted is proven, and it looks like that it will be the case, then Trump won the election. You can hoop and hollar all you want about this reason or that, but get ready for the do over or maybe because of the fraud in which is being proven as we speak, Trump automatically wins.

There will be no do over and no one is handing Trump the election he lost. You will have to go through the rest of your life miserable in the belief that Impeached Trump was robbed.

I can live with that. You deserve it for believing such a huckster who sold you bill of goods.

Glad you think it's over, so stay tuned because it ain't even close to being over.

You poor thing, this is gonna haunt you for life.

No, you are wrong on that one, but if Biden has to concede, it will devastate you because you have way to much invested in your leftism ideology in order to be set back again.

"...if Biden has to concede..."

So you are ok with corruption ? Why am I not surprised ?

As I never said I'm ok with corruption, I'm not surprised you're a fucking imbecile who suffers from delusions.

But Biden wasn't even hidden behind stupidity of "I don't know what is classified information or not" type corruption.

Biden was open, blatant, in your face, I saved my son and his $50 Million for a few months cronies from a prosecutor, type corruption.

Biden's corruption was so clear, so obvious, so open... that either you should not support Biden over Trump, or you support corruption.

It isn't even up for debate. We now know for a fact, without even the slightest of questions, that Biden is openly corrupt.

So do you want Biden as president? If yes, then you support corruption. End of story.

You can deny that until the end of time, we've seen the videos, we read the emails, we know the story. Biden didn't deny it, and he was openly boasting about it.

You support open corruption if you want Biden to be president. End of the story, sir. That is the only position one can have, and support Biden.

That's been debunked. There was no active investigation into his son when he forced the issue of firing that corrupt prosecutor.

That claim you just made, is what was debunked.

However, Shokin, at the time, according to the interview, was investigating Mykola Zlochevsky, the former minister of ecology and natural resources of Ukraine — also the founder of Burisma. Hunter Biden was appointed to the board of the firm, which Shokin claimed was an appointment made by Zlochevsky “in order to protect himself.”​

Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show

The fired prosecutor at the center of the Ukraine controversy said during a private interview with President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani earlier this year that he was told to back off an investigation into a natural gas firm that was linked to Joe Biden’s son, according to details of...

www.foxnews.com

Moreover.....

“Mr. Shokin attempted to continue the investigations but on or around June or July of 2015, the U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey R. Pyatt told him that the investigation has to be handled with white gloves, which according to Mr. Shokin, that implied do nothing,” the notes from the interview stated. The notes also claimed Shokin was told Biden had held up U.S. aid to Ukraine over the investigation.​

​

Shokin was fired in April 2016, and his case was “closed by the current Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko,” according to the notes. Despite his claims, Shokin, on both sides of the Atlantic, had been widely accused of corruption.​

So let's review.

The investigation into Burisma was dormant. Not closed. Only after he was fired, did the new Prosecutor General close the investigation.

Why was it dormant? Because Shokin had been threatened, because Biden's son was on the board of directors.

End of story dude. This was clear undeniable corruption. The facts prove it. You are wrong. You elected an openly corrupt president, in the name of getting rid of corruption. You, and all the mindless playthings of the left, have been played for complete and total fools, and you are.

Nice try, but no. That's what Shokin said last year when talking with Giuliani. But in reality...

​

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

​

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.​

​

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”​

​

[...]​

​

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.​

​

[...]​

​

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

So right there in your own post.......... You make my point.

“It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

*YOU* posted that. Correct? You posted that from your own link. YOU SAID IT.

When was Hunter Biden added to the board of directors at Burisma?

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf

This is from the Senate Governments own investigation.

Page 3, paragraph 2, please read....

​

On April 16, 2014, Vice President Biden met with his son’s business partner, Devon Archer, at the White House. Five days later, Vice President Biden visited Ukraine, and he soon after was described in the press as the “public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.” The day after his visit, on April 22, Archer joined the board of Burisma. Six days later, on April 28, British officials seized $23 million from the London bank accounts of Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky. Fourteen days later, on May 12, Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma, and over the course of the next several years, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.​

So..... then as you pointed out... magically from 2014 to 2015, the investigation was shelved, and they did not purse it.

Directly after Hunter Biden joined the board of directors at Bursima, which was literally 14 days after British officials seized assets of the owner of the company for corruption.

Let's recap again...

• Burisma is being investigated for corruption.
• British officials seize assets of a corrupt oligarch.
• Hunter Biden joins corrupt oligarch's company board of directors.
• Investigation is shelved.
• Hunter Biden is paid tens of millions.
• Joe Biden demands prosecutor who will not dismiss the case, to be fired.
• Prosecutor is fired, new prosecutor dismisses case.
• Joe Biden brags about protecting son's lucrative deal with corrupt oligarch by getting the prosecutor fired.

Democrats voted in favor of clear, unambiguous, bold faced corruption, at the highest levels of the US government.

End of story. That's is all there is to it. You support corruption. Then end. Game over. Thanks for playing, but you are a supporter of corruption.

 

[Andylusion]

No. Now you are sounding like a Democrat, saying accusations against Bret Kavanough are all that is required.

Not quite

I am not about to put blind faith into strangers in black robes who continually abuse their power just because you will call me dirty names if I dont

We are supposed to be the party of evidence. If you have clear evidence, by all means provide it.

But this "every single judge is corrupt, without evidence" is like Democrats saying "Believe all women without evidence!".

Sorry, but I'm not a partisan bigot, and I'll call out anyone when they start doing this crazy left-wing style "Trump-Russia must be true, because I refuse to accept he's my president" nonsense.

When Right-wing people start talking like mindless left-wingers, I'm going to call them out.

You want people to take you seriously, by all means provide real evidence. I'd love to see real evidence. But just because left-wingers are mindless idiots these days, doesn't mean I'm going to join them in the 'no need for evidence' mantra.

 

[Andylusion]

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

Nah, Trump did in fact lose. All of the bad votes added together in any state, is not nearly enough to change the outcome. He did in fact lose the election.

The way he lost, is still because of lies and evil in the media, and a failure of Americans to care about truth.

But they did in fact vote for that openly corrupt Biden. So... it is what it is.

Not giving up yet. It matters not how many votes if the election was fraudulent, because who knows how deep the fraud went

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

LOLOL

Yes, he lost. All of the swing states have certified their respective elections.

Biden officially has enough electoral college votes to win the presidency after California became the latest state to certify its election results

California's 55 electors put Biden over the 270 electoral college votes needed to win, while Trump continues to contest the election in court.

www.businessinsider.com

Certification means nothing if the election is over turned. Trust me when I say that their are literally hundreds of thousands of citizen's praying this bullcrap election is overturned. Biden and Harris are losers.. They have just benefitted temporarily from a criminally run election by the deep state.

Who cares what you pray for? Biden won. Trump lost. The sooner you accept reality the better off you'll be. Or let it eat away at you for the rest of your life. No skin off my back.

I'm not hundreds of thousands of voters, but I'm only one of the hundreds of thousands across this nation who are praying for Trump to prevail, and justice to win the day.

No skin off my back upon what you think either.

LOL

A million people can pray for that. It's over. Enough states have certified their respective elections to give Biden the win. No state is going to tell a majority of their voters ... we counted your votes and Biden won... we canvassed your votes and Biden won... we certified your votes and Biden won... but fuck you and your votes, we're giving our electoral votes to Trump.

It's over, you lost. Deal with it, loser.

It doesn't matter, because if it was a fraudulent election, then it is null and voided. A do over is either nessesary or Trump wins because if the amount of fraud and illegal votes counted is proven, and it looks like that it will be the case, then Trump won the election. You can hoop and hollar all you want about this reason or that, but get ready for the do over or maybe because of the fraud in which is being proven as we speak, Trump automatically wins.

There will be no do over and no one is handing Trump the election he lost. You will have to go through the rest of your life miserable in the belief that Impeached Trump was robbed.

I can live with that. You deserve it for believing such a huckster who sold you bill of goods.

Glad you think it's over, so stay tuned because it ain't even close to being over.

You poor thing, this is gonna haunt you for life.

No, you are wrong on that one, but if Biden has to concede, it will devastate you because you have way to much invested in your leftism ideology in order to be set back again.

"...if Biden has to concede..."

So you are ok with corruption ? Why am I not surprised ?

As I never said I'm ok with corruption, I'm not surprised you're a fucking imbecile who suffers from delusions.

But Biden wasn't even hidden behind stupidity of "I don't know what is classified information or not" type corruption.

Biden was open, blatant, in your face, I saved my son and his $50 Million for a few months cronies from a prosecutor, type corruption.

Biden's corruption was so clear, so obvious, so open... that either you should not support Biden over Trump, or you support corruption.

It isn't even up for debate. We now know for a fact, without even the slightest of questions, that Biden is openly corrupt.

So do you want Biden as president? If yes, then you support corruption. End of story.

You can deny that until the end of time, we've seen the videos, we read the emails, we know the story. Biden didn't deny it, and he was openly boasting about it.

You support open corruption if you want Biden to be president. End of the story, sir. That is the only position one can have, and support Biden.

That's been debunked. There was no active investigation into his son when he forced the issue of firing that corrupt prosecutor.

That claim you just made, is what was debunked.

However, Shokin, at the time, according to the interview, was investigating Mykola Zlochevsky, the former minister of ecology and natural resources of Ukraine — also the founder of Burisma. Hunter Biden was appointed to the board of the firm, which Shokin claimed was an appointment made by Zlochevsky “in order to protect himself.”​

Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show

The fired prosecutor at the center of the Ukraine controversy said during a private interview with President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani earlier this year that he was told to back off an investigation into a natural gas firm that was linked to Joe Biden’s son, according to details of...

www.foxnews.com

Moreover.....

“Mr. Shokin attempted to continue the investigations but on or around June or July of 2015, the U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey R. Pyatt told him that the investigation has to be handled with white gloves, which according to Mr. Shokin, that implied do nothing,” the notes from the interview stated. The notes also claimed Shokin was told Biden had held up U.S. aid to Ukraine over the investigation.​

​

Shokin was fired in April 2016, and his case was “closed by the current Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko,” according to the notes. Despite his claims, Shokin, on both sides of the Atlantic, had been widely accused of corruption.​

So let's review.

The investigation into Burisma was dormant. Not closed. Only after he was fired, did the new Prosecutor General close the investigation.

Why was it dormant? Because Shokin had been threatened, because Biden's son was on the board of directors.

End of story dude. This was clear undeniable corruption. The facts prove it. You are wrong. You elected an openly corrupt president, in the name of getting rid of corruption. You, and all the mindless playthings of the left, have been played for complete and total fools, and you are.

Nice try, but no. That's what Shokin said last year when talking with Giuliani. But in reality...

​

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

​

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.​

​

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”​

​

[...]​

​

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.​

​

[...]​

​

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

Why do you use a Dimwinger candidate for President in 2020 as a source and expect to be taken seriously?

Exactly how brain-dead are you to think Vitaliy Kasko is a "Dimwinger candidate for President in 2020?"

Your source is Bloomberg, Stupid.

He ran on the Dimwinger ticket in 2020, and once he lost spent tens of millions to defeat Trump.

Why do you think anyone will believe your source, Dummy?

And you value what...Breitbart? Fox? Their ties to the Trump Admin are numerous and direct.

Breitbart did go a little crazy, and now they are better. But Fox? Trump and Fox clashed all the time.

Which by the way, is one of the reasons Fox is far better than left-wing news sources. We already have direct recorded meetings in CNN, that show that the leadership was specifically directing reporters on what to report, and what not to report, and how to spin their stories.

 

[Andylusion]

Anyone using Bloomberg as a source for opinion pieces critical of Trump are morons. (that would be you)

Blomberg is a well respected news organization.

Yours are not...

Yeah.....

Americans Remain Distrustful of Mass Media

A steady 40% of Americans say they have "a great deal" or "a fair amount" of trust in the mass media when it comes to reporting the news fully, accurately and fairly.

news.gallup.com

Barely 40% of the public has a high level of trust in those news media outlets you claim as a "well respected news organization".

Well respected by whom? Democrats? When we can clearly see how bias the traditional news media outlets are in favor of Democrats, and Democrats are the only ones that consider them 'well respected'?

The only people who find the ridiculously bias media as well respected are bias people who support them.

The rest of us do not. Patting each other on the back, doesn't make you well respected.