Colorado Father Fights To Keep Government From Sterilizing His 14-Year-Old Son

[scruffy]

I am missing where Democrats are involved. This looks like a child parenting / custody issue. One parent is supporting nonsurgical stuff. The other is not. Unless you are suddenly against parental rights thats all this thread is.

Parents have no right to mutilate their children.

The state should err on the side of safety.

 

[OldFlame]

Fearmongering. Because lurid sexual issues get you guys all worked up and emotional.

Lurid sexual issues??? lol Taking a child and changing his/her life forever is a 'lurid sexual issue'?

You're obviously brainwashed by the left and their bullshit propaganda and lies.

 

[dblack]

Lurid sexual issues??? lol Taking a child and changing his/her life forever is a 'lurid sexual issue'?

It sure seems to get you all lathered up. That's why they run with sensationalistic lies for headlines. The point is to validate your paranoid fears regarding government and queers.

 

[OldFlame]

It sure seems to get you all lathered up. That's why they run with sensationalistic lies for headlines. The point is to validate your paranoid fears regarding government and queers.

What is 'all lathered up' exactly? If that's what you call being concerned for parental rights being stripped by a court for no good reason other than so a child can 'transition', or being concerned for children being permanently altered before they really understand what they're asking for, then you can **** off. Because all you're doing it assigning bullshit propaganda language to a serious issue and a serious concern, and trying to undermine those concerns by making false claims about the people making them. A classic tactic of the left, so you've learned well.

I also notice that you used it to deflect from my question, which you didn't answer.

Taking a child and changing his/her life forever is a 'lurid sexual issue'? The answer would be no, asshat.

 

[dblack]

Taking a child and changing his/her life forever is a 'lurid sexual issue'? The answer would be no, asshat.

Of course it is. Sex is always provocative. It evokes deep emotional responses in people, which makes them less rational and easier to manipulate.

 

[OldFlame]

Of course it is. Sex is always provocative. It evokes deep emotional responses in people, which makes them less rational and easier to manipulate.

There's nothing 'sexual' about it, if that subject evokes a 'deep, emotional' response in you that points to sex, then you need to get help.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Sure, sure. I'm not debating the merits of the case. And it hasn't been resolved yet. Regardless, the headline is a lie designed to stoke fear and anger.

Its the Federalist.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Sorry, but not even in the same ******* ballpark.

You are the perfect example of moral equivalency belief.

Lines are meant to be drawn. Progressives are incapable of doing so.

Evidently the state disagrees with you on where the line is

Parents have no right to mutilate their children.

Thats good and not occurring in this case.

The state should err on the side of safety.

They are. This is not related to the state, but the parents.
.

 

[martybegan]

Evidently the state disagrees with you on where the line is


Thats good and not occurring in this case.


They are. This is not related to the state, but the parents.
.

Then the State is ******* wrong.

Drugging a kid so puberty never happens is just the same as surgery.

 

[dblack]

There's nothing 'sexual' about it, if that subject evokes a 'deep, emotional' response in you that points to sex, then you need to get help.

LOL - it's a sex change procedure. How does that NOT point to sex???

 

[dblack]

Its the Federalist.

And?

 

[rightwinger]

So government is involved, thanks

Yes, that is what courts are for

 

[rightwinger]

The government sided with the mother, taking away the father's rights. The GOVERNMENT intervened. End of story.

Ummm….who is supposed to decide a disagreement between the parents?

The fact that the court ruled against the father shows that he did have rights to present his case in court

 

[rightwinger]

Relevant in the sense he has seen first hand the damage this type of crap can cause.

I have also seen the damage of denying gender reassignment

 

[martybegan]

I have also seen the damage of denying gender reassignment

If you are so unsure of your choice in doing this that you require universal play along of your delusion, then tough shit.

Why do I have to lie to myself and reality for others?

 

[Donald H]

Will political and religious convictions turn into murder by gun in America?

 

[rightwinger]

If you are so unsure of your choice in doing this that you require universal play along of your delusion, then tough shit.

Why do I have to lie to myself and reality for others?

?

 

[martybegan]

?

Denying gender re-assignment.

Part of that requires everyone to play along with the person.

Why should I be forced to deny reality?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The child has to start the process by indicating he wants to be a girl. Otherwise, you're just letting adults look at a child and insist he needs to transition.

Or, an adult in a position of authority tells the child that a transition will solve all their problems.

 

[martybegan]

Or, an adult in a position of authority tells the child that a transition will solve all their problems.

Or a parent gets attention by grooming their kid to be transgender.