Colorado Father Fights To Keep Government From Sterilizing His 14-Year-Old Son

Well, one Karen called their butting into someone else as fake news. Live your life little boy Marty and stay out of other's.
 
The State in question is full of lefty idiots that follow trans bullshit.
Or the actual case found the "Father" was a loser. We have no idea as the article gives no information and can't be independently verified. Is it even real? It did not link or even cite the case.
 
Last edited:
According to the article his father says NO. The should be the final say. Not you or me. We're not talking about a custody battle between the two parents. This is a life-altering decision that can never be reversed.
One parent says No, the other says Yes
Why we have courts
 
Doing medical interventions to children is a recent invention.

The forced acceptance of their delusion is also a new concept.

Both suck.
You accepting their “delusion” or not does not change things

Transgenders exist whether you like it or not. Providing initial non surgical procedures prior to puberty improves the probability of successful transition
 
You accepting their “delusion” or not does not change things

Transgenders exist whether you like it or not. Providing initial non surgical procedures prior to puberty improves the probability of successful transition
I really want to see the actual case now.
 
Or the actual case found the "Father" was a loser. We have no idea as the article gives no information and can't be independently verified. Is it even real? It did not link or even cite the case.

Purely probably because he doesn't want his son turned into a mutilated freak.
 
LOL - it's a sex change procedure. How does that NOT point to sex???

It's attempting to change from male to female or vice versa, it has nothing to do with the sex act.
 
Ummm….who is supposed to decide a disagreement between the parents?

The fact that the court ruled against the father shows that he did have rights to present his case in court

How often do the courts rule in favor of the parent that is against permanently altering their child's future?
 
Who said it did??

OMG, seriously? So when you made the below statements, you were referring to sex as in male/female? If so, why would that be provocative or lurid?

Of course it is. Sex is always provocative. It evokes deep emotional responses in people, which makes them less rational and easier to manipulate.

Fearmongering. Because lurid sexual issues get you guys all worked up and emotional.
 
That “concept “ of transgenderism existed in the Ancient Greece
Transgenders exist in our society whether you deny it or not

No one said mental illness started in the last 50 years.
 
Doing medical interventions to children is a recent invention.

The forced acceptance of their delusion is also a new concept.

Both suck.

I'm sure he approved of the Greeks ******* little boys they kept as slaves.
 
15th post
Purely probably because he doesn't want his son turned into a mutilated freak.
Your statement is not based on facts, just conjecture. We have no independent verification of the case (I looked - can anyone find something?)
 
How often do the courts rule in favor of the parent that is against permanently altering their child's future?
I'd suspect it's rare. And this case isn't resolved yet. The father has a good case in my view.
OMG, seriously? So when you made the below statements, you were referring to sex as in male/female? If so, why would that be provocative or lurid?
Because the headline is provocative and lurid. In addition to being false. It's meant to get people upset. It's meant to validate the perception of government as being infested with evil people hell bent on destroying the nation and maiming our children.
 
When, if ever will people mind their own ******* business and stay out of other people's business? I see many Karen's in this thread.

Well, one Karen called their butting into someone else as fake news. Live your life little boy Marty and stay out of other's.

Everyone else should mind their own business except you and others who believe a certain way?


1744135453872.webp


:safetocomeoutff:
 
No it isn't.

Chemical castration is still castration.
Surgery involves the branch of medical practice that treats injuries, diseases, and deformities by the physical removal, repair, or readjustment of organs and tissues, often involving cutting into the body.
CPS takes children away from parents who are trying to harm them.
Rarely.
The courts should rule to transfer custody.
Court ruled.

They would do so in ANY other situation where the child was being threatened.
 
Back
Top Bottom