CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist

That paper has been debunked.
It's not "a" or "that" paper you illiterate Moron.
It's EVERY Relevant NATIONAL and INTERNATIONAL Science organization in the World.

In addition, there are probably TEN "PAPERS" cited over 15-20 years... all affirming and the numbers going Higher over time as we learn more and it does indeed get WarmER. (85%-100% over time)

and you are STUPID enough to call that "That paper has been debunked" you Lying MORON.
and 'debunked" by BUNK (Like WUWT) is Not "debunked" it's "criticized" by a pile of shlt.

Get some Elmers glue and Steal a Head from a Human.

`
 
Faster than what??

We survive a 60 to 70 degree temperature every year for the past 250,000 years and you're telling us that another 1.5 degrees will end all life on Earth? Stupid non-science should be removed from all college campuses and shunned by sane people
You’re one stupid motherfucker.
 
You know it's not science and just EnviroMarxism when they start excusing their Master Xi cuz their CO2 is on a per capital basis or something...Consensus!
Ooooo, now breaking out the national socialist screed.

So, politics or science little boi.
 
The goal like with any environmental influence, is to keep it from changing FASTER then we as a species can adapt.

I've got air-conditioning, I can adapt pretty damn fast!!!
Gee, I didn’t know “environmental influence “ was only temperature. Dah. I gave you a little credit for reading comp. My mistake. It’s hilarious you think only temperature is part of anyones environment.
 
You're one of the dumbest people here and believe me, that's a feat! You don't seem to know what I'm talking about and you just mindlessly parrot talking points. Are you an AGW AI?
Me ? I know the difference between change alone and rate of change. You don’t have a clue what AGW is about. First step in recovery, is to admit you have a problem, bubba.
 
List the top 5 “environmental influences“ that you're wetting your pants over.
I don’t have five, dufus. AGW is part of every environmental influence.
We have a minimum of eight,and the important ones vary with the immediacy of the problem. This is why our MILITARY includes AGW (number three) in assessing their long term and immediate missions
COVID stupid was one and more important then your fking air temp. All of them are affected by AGW…everyone.
  1. Chemical safety
  2. Air pollution
  3. Climate change and natural disasters
  4. Diseases caused by microbes
  5. Lack of access to health care
  6. Infrastructure issues
  7. Poor water quality
  8. Global environmental issues
The last one includes wars, immigration and migration
 
I don’t have five, dufus. AGW is part of every environmental influence.
We have a minimum of eight,and the important ones vary with the immediacy of the problem. This is why our MILITARY includes AGW (number three) in assessing their long term and immediate missions
COVID stupid was one and more important then your fking air temp. All of them are affected by AGW…everyone.
  1. Chemical safety
  2. Air pollution
  3. Climate change and natural disasters
  4. Diseases caused by microbes
  5. Lack of access to health care
  6. Infrastructure issues
  7. Poor water quality
  8. Global environmental issues
The last one includes wars, immigration and migration

The goal is not to keep the climate from changing. That’s ridiculous. The goal like with any environmental influence, is to keep it from changing FASTER then we as a species can adapt. Remember this. It’s the brightest thing you’ll hear on any discussion about climate change. I copied it from smart people not dumb asses.

Climate change might happen too fast for humans to adapt to chemical safety?
Or chemical safety might happen too fast for humans to adapt?

Did you get this from real smart people (top 2%?),
or just from people smarter than you (top 95%?)
 
Me ? I know the difference between change alone and rate of change. You don’t have a clue what AGW is about. First step in recovery, is to admit you have a problem, bubba.

Tell me again how Chinese CO2 has no impact because it's on a per capita basis
 
The goal is not to keep the climate from changing. That’s ridiculous. The goal like with any environmental influence, is to keep it from changing FASTER then we as a species can adapt. Remember this. It’s the brightest thing you’ll hear on any discussion about climate change. I copied it from smart people not dumb asses.

Climate change might happen too fast for humans to adapt to chemical safety?
Or chemical safety might happen too fast for humans to adapt?

Did you get this from real smart people (top 2%?),
or just from people smarter than you (top 95%?)
Weak soap todd.


Can you provide one scientific organization that backs the AGW denial position
 
Weak soap todd.


Can you provide one scientific organization that backs the AGW denial position

Weak soap? LOL!

Can you help translate the claim of your fellow traveler?

The goal is not to keep the climate from changing. That’s ridiculous. The goal like with any environmental influence, is to keep it from changing FASTER then we as a species can adapt. Remember this. It’s the brightest thing you’ll hear on any discussion about climate change. I copied it from smart people not dumb asses.

What in the actual fuck is he whining about? He says it doesn't mean temperature.
 

Forum List

Back
Top