Billo_Really
Litre of the Band
Just because I'm giving you answers you don't care for, does not mean I'm not participating.
CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist
- Thread starter bripat9643
- Start date
You're like a fish struggling in a net.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,704
- 34,707
- 2,180
Only you think you’re actually answering!
Billo_Really
Litre of the Band
And you are like the kid who has to wear hockey equipment, but you are not on a team!
Billo_Really
Litre of the Band
If you don't like my answers, ask better questions.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,704
- 34,707
- 2,180
Aren’t any better than post the data. The fact you haven’t isn’t an answer. Ask anyone else in here
You are one fucking pwned troll.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,704
- 34,707
- 2,180
Any day cultman post empirical data from the 99%
Okay
2020 Ties for Global Temperature Record - Climate Adaptation Center
Data shows that 2020 ties for the global temperature record. The global average is about 1.3C higher than pre-industrial levels, close to the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5C
www.theclimateadaptationcenter.org
The Keeling Curve
The Keeling Curve is a daily record of global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration maintained by Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,704
- 34,707
- 2,180
So where are the 99% that agree with those?Okay
2020 Ties for Global Temperature Record - Climate Adaptation Center
Data shows that 2020 ties for the global temperature record. The global average is about 1.3C higher than pre-industrial levels, close to the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5C
The Keeling Curve
The Keeling Curve is a daily record of global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration maintained by Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego.keelingcurve.ucsd.edu
Everyone else but you I guess.
Hockey is for fags.
Correlation does not prove causation. The geologic record is littered with warming and cooling trends that were not caused by CO2 or orbital forcing. If your claim were true the planet wouldn't be 2C cooler with 120 ppm more atmospheric CO2 than the previous interglacial period and the planet wouldn't have cooled with atmospheric CO2 greater than 600 ppm.Okay
2020 Ties for Global Temperature Record - Climate Adaptation Center
Data shows that 2020 ties for the global temperature record. The global average is about 1.3C higher than pre-industrial levels, close to the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5C
The Keeling Curve
The Keeling Curve is a daily record of global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration maintained by Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego.
Last edited:
pwned? How old are you?
69
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
Well then you need to tell me why CO2 has gone up and down in the holocoen to the points we are at today. You claim that this is unusual, but the paleo records proves that it is not. Can you fail any more epically?Okay
2020 Ties for Global Temperature Record - Climate Adaptation Center
Data shows that 2020 ties for the global temperature record. The global average is about 1.3C higher than pre-industrial levels, close to the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5C
The Keeling Curve
The Keeling Curve is a daily record of global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration maintained by Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego.
Explain this away Crick... Just try...
What I "claimed" was that those were the empirical data for which jc456 asked.Well then you need to tell me why CO2 has gone up and down in the holocoen to the points we are at today. You claim that this is unusual, but the paleo records proves that it is not. Can you fail any more epically?
View attachment 751042
Explain this away Crick... Just try...
As for CO2, your graph above is a cherry-picked whoopee graph. Note the span of both axes and then compare that to the data below.
Well then you need to tell me why CO2 has gone up and down in the holocoen to the points we are at today. You claim that this is unusual, but the paleo records proves that it is not. Can you fail any more epically?
View attachment 751042
Explain this away Crick... Just try...
Your high range data is the last fifth of the Holocene or so. And I just don't believe it. For starters, where's your link?
Next, why does it look so dramatically different than all these other plots, several of which purport to show the same data.
10,000 Years of Carbon Dioxide - Berkeley Earth
A graph reflecting atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the last 10,000 years.
berkeleyearth.org
CO2 vs Temperature: Last 2000 years
www.geocraft.com
News and articles
Discover the latest in science and innovation with our news stories and media releases.
blog.csiro.au
I'll leave the explaining this away - as to why your no-source-provided-data look so unlike these other plots of the same Law Dome CO2 data - to YOU.
Attachments
Last edited:
Thus proving that temperature does not correlate to CO2.What I "claimed" was that those were the empirical data for which jc456 asked.
As for CO2, your graph above is a cherry-picked whoopee graph. Note the span of both axes and then compare that to the data below.
Your high range data is the last fifth of the Holocene or so. And I just don't believe it. For starters, where's your link?
Next, why does it look so dramatically different than all these other plots, several of which purport to show the same data.
10,000 Years of Carbon Dioxide - Berkeley Earth
A graph reflecting atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the last 10,000 years.
CO2 vs Temperature: Last 2000 years
www.geocraft.com
News and articles
Discover the latest in science and innovation with our news stories and media releases.
I'll leave the explaining this away - as to why your no-source-provided-data look so unlike these other plots of the same Law Dome CO2 data - to YOU.
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,346
- 12,925
- 2,400
Crick posed this chart that destroys his own claims, but he suffers from ocular delusions in reading charts every day.
for 11,000 years CO2 stayed in a tight range of just 20 ppm between 260-280 ppm yet the temperature change was large around 2-3C range while CO2 just mostly sat there even when it was about 260 ppm for 6,000 years temperature changed greatly during that time up to 3C change.
and this one too showing little CO2 change for a neat 1,800 years,
Those are SOUTH Polar ice core readings now we can add the more accurate GISP2 ice core data of Greenland showing similar temperature swings while CO2 barely changed at all for 10,000 years:
LINK
Similar 2-3.5C temperature swings while CO2 barely change at all.
Then we have this series of GISP2 charts from 14 years ago that utterly destroys the stupid Hockey Stick mania from CO2 sniffing worshippers.
LINK
===
LOL, it is obvious that CO2 doesn't drive temperature swings, but Crick suffers from severe ocular delusions to accept the evidence while most of us are rational can see the obvious.
Warmist/alarmists do NOT know they have been refuted for years because they have been steeped in delusional climate crisis propaganda swallowing the deepest bullshit gladly.
While rational beings know there is NO climate crisis at all, and this article drives it home with abundant evidence there is nothing unusual going on.
Where is the Climate Emergency?
LINK
Warmist/alarmists over several forums I posted this flypaper gem in gained around 750 replies but NONE of them based on the CONTENT of the article because they are TERRIFIED of it thus never address any of it.
Wake up Crick you have been beaten yet again, why don't you go back to fishing or traveling where you can be happy again and free of delusions.
for 11,000 years CO2 stayed in a tight range of just 20 ppm between 260-280 ppm yet the temperature change was large around 2-3C range while CO2 just mostly sat there even when it was about 260 ppm for 6,000 years temperature changed greatly during that time up to 3C change.
and this one too showing little CO2 change for a neat 1,800 years,
Those are SOUTH Polar ice core readings now we can add the more accurate GISP2 ice core data of Greenland showing similar temperature swings while CO2 barely changed at all for 10,000 years:
LINK
Similar 2-3.5C temperature swings while CO2 barely change at all.
Then we have this series of GISP2 charts from 14 years ago that utterly destroys the stupid Hockey Stick mania from CO2 sniffing worshippers.
Historical video perspective: our current "unprecedented" global warming in the context of scale
LINK
===
LOL, it is obvious that CO2 doesn't drive temperature swings, but Crick suffers from severe ocular delusions to accept the evidence while most of us are rational can see the obvious.
Warmist/alarmists do NOT know they have been refuted for years because they have been steeped in delusional climate crisis propaganda swallowing the deepest bullshit gladly.
While rational beings know there is NO climate crisis at all, and this article drives it home with abundant evidence there is nothing unusual going on.
Where is the Climate Emergency?
LINK
Warmist/alarmists over several forums I posted this flypaper gem in gained around 750 replies but NONE of them based on the CONTENT of the article because they are TERRIFIED of it thus never address any of it.
Wake up Crick you have been beaten yet again, why don't you go back to fishing or traveling where you can be happy again and free of delusions.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Biden Admin Sent DHS, HSI Fake Addresses for 300,000 Missing Migrant Children- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 0
-
So the boss of Arab "palestinians" (al jazeera's) QATAR ordered them to release Edan Alexander- Started by Sayaras
- Replies: 1
-
WATCH: BillMaher puts America hate into perspective. This is very funny and thought provoking- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 0
-
MAGA is Fighting for Western civilization and the Left Wants to Destroy It- Started by DonGlock26
- Replies: 0
-
Democrats Propose A Different Kind Of Social Security Overhaul- Started by skews13
- Replies: 4
