CNN Guest Host Claims The Electoral College Is Rooted In Slavery

I said slavery was a major component of the EC. And that is a true statement. I consider that to mean the same thing as the EC "being rooted" in slavery.
No that is not what you said

You stated " That is a historical fact that the EC is rooted in slavery "
That is a direct quote from post number 2 in this thread

Yu are a liar an unedcuated fool and an intellectual weakling

You are wrong it is not at the root of the EC or a component of it at all. Claiming that the 3/5 compromise AFFECTED the EC is not the same thing4
You have YET to address the root of the EC
 
No that is not what you said
You stated " That is a historical fact that the EC is rooted in slavery "
That is a direct quote from post number 2 in this thread
Yep, and I explained why. Several times.

Yu are a liar an unedcuated fool and an intellectual weakling
Not as much as you for saying ridiculous nonsense like illegal immigration is immoral.

You are wrong it is not at the root of the EC or a component of it at all. Claiming that the 3/5 compromise AFFECTED the EC is not the same thing4
You have YET to address the root of the EC
Slavery is a huge component of the EC. You are simply wrong and not very smart.
 
Yes it is

It is a criminal invasion much like home invasion NOTHING like jaywalking you brainddead fool
Nope. Wrong again. Home invaders don't get paid to work backbreaking jobs. Illegal immigrants do.

And many of them are paid by rich Republicans.
 
Yep, and I explained why. Several times.


Not as much as you for saying ridiculous nonsense like illegal immigration is immoral.


Slavery is a huge component of the EC. You are simply wrong and not very smart.
Slavery is not a component of the EDC whatsoever

I was correct and proven so about ilegal immigration . Thde ridiculous and stupid post was comparing it to jay walking
 
Nope. Wrong again. Home invaders don't get paid to work backbreaking jobs. Illegal immigrants do.

And many of them are paid by rich Republicans.
Yes home invaders do get paid to do easy jobs and back breaking jobs as many home invaders are illegal immigrants''
 
You did not explain at all

You focused on results not on the root. The 3/5 compromise IS NOT the root of the EC
It was included in the EC to give the South more voting power in presidential elections and to give the South more representatives in the House. In other words, the EC was used to protect slavery in the South.

Those are historical facts. I consider that to mean that the EC is rooted in slavery.
 
It was included in the EC to give the South more voting power in presidential elections and to give the South more representatives in the House. In other words, the EC was used to protect slavery in the South.

Those are historical facts. I consider that to mean that the EC is rooted in slavery.
Wrong

The 3/5 compromise was included in the constitution to LIMIT the voting power of the slave states not to give them MORE

The EC on the other hand was created to prevent direct democracy

THOSE are facts your claims are illogical and wrong

GThe EC is not rooted in slavery and your constant denial of facts prove it
 
Wrong

The 3/5 compromise was included in the constitution to LIMIT the voting power of the slave states not to give them MORE
Why should any slaves be included in the population count for the South and the EC when slavery was immoral?

The South was very pleased with the 3/5 Compromise. That's a major reason why the Southern delegates ratified the Constitution.

The EC on the other hand was created to prevent direct democracy
No, that is what the House and Senate were created for. You're just talking out of your ass now.

THOSE are facts your claims are illogical and wrong

GThe EC is not rooted in slavery and your constant denial of facts prove it
Yes, the EC is rooted in slavery....as I've already explained many times.
 
No that is not what you said

You stated " That is a historical fact that the EC is rooted in slavery "
That is a direct quote from post number 2 in this thread

Yu are a liar an unedcuated fool and an intellectual weakling

You are wrong it is not at the root of the EC or a component of it at all. Claiming that the 3/5 compromise AFFECTED the EC is not the same thing4
You have YET to address the root of the EC
You know we can all see the disingenuous, semantic game you're playing, right? It is an inescapable historical fact that the EC was born of a compromise to appease less heavily populated southern states in order to secure their support to ratify the Constitution. If you refuse to acknowledge that fact Yu are a liar an uneducated fool and an intellectual weakling.
 
You know we can all see the disingenuous, semantic game you're playing, right? It is an inescapable historical fact that the EC was born of a compromise to appease less heavily populated southern states in order to secure their support to ratify the Constitution. If you refuse to acknowledge that fact Yu are a liar an uneducated fool and an intellectual weakling.
No it is not and you see no such thing
 
15th post
Why should any slaves be included in the population count for the South and the EC when slavery was immoral?

The South was very pleased with the 3/5 Compromise. That's a major reason why the Southern delegates ratified the Constitution.


No, that is what the House and Senate were created for. You're just talking out of your ass now.


Yes, the EC is rooted in slavery....as I've already explained many times.


It was not universally considered immoral at the time

The south wanted total representation for their slaves they did not want the compromise

It is what the EC was created for as well that is historic FACT

]It isnot rooted in slavery and you have to lie and deny that fact
 
No. I'm smart enough and educated enough not to be brainwashed while I was in college.

That's the bottom line.

The left plays on people who are easily misled or people who are extremely biased and bigoted.
The South opposed a direct election because they would always lose.

Much, or most, of the South wanted to reject the new goverment, they could see the handwriting on the wall..

So we came up with the 3/5th compromise, which gave the South an unfair advantage. Such is politics...
 
I'm sure that is what your fucked-up MAGA religion tells you, gomer.

Go pray to your orange god some more....
^^^ again, this is the girl who introduced herself as wanting to engage in “civilized” discussions about politics.

She really needs to grow up.
 
It was not universally considered immoral at the time

The south wanted total representation for their slaves they did not want the compromise

It is what the EC was created for as well that is historic FACT

]It isnot rooted in slavery and you have to lie and deny that fact
Do you always contradict yourself?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom