CNN Guest Host Claims The Electoral College Is Rooted In Slavery

[mudwhistle]

These people see racism in everything.

This entire premise is that if black people don't get special consideration in anything, then it must be rooted in slavery.

You really have to be stupid to think this way, but it seems our society churns these types out in mass.

If they can't find any racism, they'll create the perception of racism.

(The SPLC proved this was the case by funding rightwing extremist groups with taxpayer money)

 

[Alicia J]

These people see racism in everything.

This entire premise is that if black people don't get special consideration in anything, then it must be rooted in slavery.

You really have to be stupid to think this way, but it seems our society churns these types out in mass.

If they can't find any racism, they'll create the perception of racism.

(The SPLC proved this was the case by funding rightwing extremist groups with taxpayer money)

That is a historical fact that the EC is rooted in slavery.

John Adams would have won re-election against Virginian Thomas Jefferson in 1800 if it wasn't for the slave-heavy Southern states and the additional EC votes from slaves counting as 3/5 of a citizen.

 

[riseabovethis]

Hell, my Cheerios are rooted in slavery.

 

[mudwhistle]

That is a historical fact that the EC is rooted in slavery.

John Adams would have won re-election against Virginian Thomas Jefferson in 1800 if it wasn't for the slave-heavy Southern states and the additional EC votes from slaves counting as 3/5 of a citizen.

Common-sense is racist.

 

[Alicia J]

Common-sense is racist.

You're not smart, you're not educated, and you're not capable of debating this topic.

That is the bottom line.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Which, as any educated adult knows, is true.

 

[mudwhistle]

You're not smart, you're not educated, and you're not capable of debating this topic.

That is the bottom line.

No. I'm smart enough and educated enough not to be brainwashed while I was in college.

That's the bottom line.

The left plays on people who are easily misled or people who are extremely biased and bigoted.

 

[MarcATL]

It is.

 

[Rawley]

That is a historical fact that the EC is rooted in slavery.

John Adams would have won re-election against Virginian Thomas Jefferson in 1800 if it wasn't for the slave-heavy Southern states and the additional EC votes from slaves counting as 3/5 of a citizen.

ANd this made sense to you when you wrote it?

 

[Alicia J]

No. I'm smart enough and educated enough not to be brainwashed while I was in college.

Weak ass shit from a weak ass MAGA lighweight who knows nothing.

Simply looking at the election results from 1800 shows that Jefferson loses to Adams if you don't include the 3/5 slave "votes" for the Southern states in the EC.

 

[SeaMajor7]

You're not smart, you're not educated, and you're not capable of debating this topic.

That is the bottom line.

You're not educated, you are SUBVERTED.
BRAINWASHED.
INDOCTRINATED.
What's funny is that when your Marxist masters filled your mush brain full of anti-American propaganda, you didn't have an ounce of critical thinking and common sense to question the crap you were being fed. NOPE.
You enthusiastically lapped it all up.
Now you're all sorts of proud of your misperception that you know it all.
The reality is that you're nothing but a demented avenger subverted demoralized Stalinist Marxist Leninist zombie ASSHOLE.
Congratulations.

 

[Alicia J]

ANd this made sense to you when you wrote it?

What are you confused about, dumb ass?

The Southern states were given extra electoral college votes for their slaves. That is a historical fact, no matter how much a MAGA troll like you tries to spin it.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

United Negro College Fund
Because the mind… is a terrible thing.

 

[mudwhistle]

Weak ass shit from a weak ass MAGA lighweight who knows nothing.

Simply looking at the election results from 1800 shows that Jefferson loses to Adams if you don't include the 3/5 slave "votes" for the Southern states in the EC.

The only thing I see that's weak ass shit is your argument.

Especially since the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Something that very few Democrats supported.

Who was the party of Slavery? Democrats
Who was the party of Jim Crow? Democrats
Who was the party of the KKK? Democrats

Need I go on?

 

[Alicia J]

The only thing I see that's weak ass shit is your argument.

Especially since the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Something that very few Democrats supported.

Who was the party of Slavery? Democrats
Who was the party of Jim Crow? Democrats
Who was the party of the KKK? Democrats

Need I go on?

None of your MAGA gibberish has anything to do with the topic of your thread.

Zero. Nada. You're a deranged MAGA troll who knows nothing.

 

[Rawley]

What are you confused about, dumb ass?

Your lack of any modicum of critical thinking, tweatwaffle

The Southern states were given extra electoral college votes for their slaves. That is a historical fact, no matter how much a MAGA troll like you tries to spin it.

The fact that they only counted slaves as 3/5th of a person rather than a whole person gave the slave states an EC advantage? Really? Were you born this way, or do they have special Progressive classes to make you this inanely dense?

 

[1srelluc]

United Negro College Fund
Because the mind… is a terrible thing.

Remember those old TV spots?.....As far as I can tell nobody complained about them.

Who knew the dems would take a great idea like that and turn it into DEI. Damn shame.

 

[Alicia J]

You're not educated, you are SUBVERTED.
BRAINWASHED.
INDOCTRINATED.
What's funny is that when your Marxist masters filled your mush brain full of anti-American propaganda, you didn't have an ounce of critical thinking and common sense to question the crap you were being fed. NOPE.
You enthusiastically lapped it all up.
Now you're all sorts of proud of your misperception that you know it all.
The reality is that you're nothing but a demented avenger subverted demoralized Stalinist Marxist Leninist zombie ASSHOLE.
Congratulations.

Sure thing, dirt stupid MAGA bumpkin.

You really told me!

 

[mudwhistle]

None of your MAGA gibberish has anything to do with the topic of your thread.

Zero. Nada. You're a deranged MAGA troll who knows nothing.

Clearly your cognitive dissonance has clouded your logic.

Try offering rational arguments instead of insults.

Maybe you might not come off as some ignorant asswipe who thinks they know everything about the subject.

 

[Alicia J]

Your lack of any modicum of critical thinking, tweatwaffle

The fact that they only counted slaves as 3/5th of a person rather than a whole person gave the slave states an EC advantage?

You decided to double-down on your stupidity.

It's known as the Three-Fifths Compromise, dolt. From the very beginning of this country, Southern states had a representation advantage in the U.S. government. --

The Three-fifths Compromise, also known as the Constitutional Compromise of 1787, was an agreement reached during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention over the inclusion of slaves in counting a state's total population. This count would determine the number of seats in the House of Representatives, the number of electoral votes each state would be allocated,<a href="Three-fifths Compromise - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a> and how much money the states would pay in taxes.

Three-fifths Compromise - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org