Closure of Al-Aqsa mosque for first time by IOF terrorists

[Shusha]

Israel has manifold times restricted access to Muslims - not just since it receives counterstrikes from Iran.

Which is why I explicitly prefaced my statement with "in this case". Did you want to talk about a different instance? We can. Name it.

There was a de facto border defined by the ceasefire agreement

No. The armistice line was (is) explicitly NOT a border. It did not change the territory of either of the Parties and was explicitly not permitted to create or change the territorial integrity of either Jordan nor Israel.

Here's the relevant text:
2.The basic purpose of the Armistice Demarcation Lines is to delineate the lines beyond which the armed forces of the respective Parties shall not move.
9.The Armistice Demarcation Lines defined in articles V and VI of this Agreement are agreed upon by the Parties without prejudice to future territorial settlements or boundary lines or to claims of either Party relating thereto.

You agree with me, because you said:

It was the Arab States incl. Egypt that explicitly stated that the de facto borders of the 1949 armistice lines to be temporary cease-fire lines rather than political or international borders

If you want to argue that Jordan had territorial control up to the Armistice Line, then we agree. But the Armistice Line was never, is not, and can not be a border (unless made so by some future treaty that does not exist as yet).

and before October 26, 1994, Jordan hadn't even recognized Israel;

Yes. But NOW Jordan recognizes Israel within its original Mandate borders .

And the former Jordan territorial claim was abandoned and transferred from Jordan ...

The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan NEVER had a legal territorial claim to land outside the borders of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan outlined in the Mandate agreements. Go ahead, try to prove me wrong. Produce a document which gives the entirety of the Mandate for Palestine to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Then explain why that legal document takes precedence over the Mandate of Palestine.

No - never did

You've been arguing for pages about non-discriminatory freedom of access. Now you are double-talking. Explain yourself.

 

[Shusha]

Which is why I explicitly prefaced my statement with "in this case". Did you want to talk about a different instance? We can. Name it.

Kruska

Let me save you the trouble. Al Aqsa was closed briefly (one day) in 2014 after a shooting on the Temple Mount committed by a Muslim. Al Aqsa was closed, again briefly (three days), in 2017 after a shooting on the Temple Mount committed by a Muslim.

Al Aqsa was closed in 2026 in an Israel-wide restriction on public gatherings. The closure was for ALL of the holy sites in the Old City including Al Aqsa, the Kotel, and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

Tell me again how this is not security related?

 

[The Duke]

In March 2026, Israeli terrorists closed Al-Aqsa Mosque and heavily restricted access to Jerusalem’s Old City for the first time since 1967, citing security concerns related to the ongoing US‑Israeli war on Iran.

IOF terrorists prevented tens of thousands of Muslims from entering Islam’s third holiest site during Ramadan’s final ten nights, a period usually marked by overflowing courtyards and all‑night prayers.

Elderly Jerusalemites who have attended Taraweeh at Al-Aqsa for decades describe this Ramadan as one of the most painful of their lives, saying that praying outside its walls feels like having “something very precious” taken away.

Being turned back at checkpoints, searched, or assaulted simply for trying to reach the mosque has produced deep sadness, but also a sharpened sense of solidarity among Palestinians who now stand shoulder to shoulder in prayer in the surrounding streets.

Foreign ministers of several Arab and Muslim‑majority states have condemned the closure, calling it a flagrant violation of international law and of the historical and legal status quo that guarantees unrestricted access to places of worship.

Their statement reiterates that the entire Al-Aqsa Mosque compound is an exclusively Muslim place of worship and urges the international community to compel Israel, as the occupying power, to reopen the gates and lift access restrictions.

https://www.palestinechronicle.com/a-declaration-of-war-closure-of-al-aqsa-mosque-raises-alarm-during-ramadan/

Across centuries, Al-Aqsa has symbolized a blessed land where prophets lived and preached. Muslims in every region keep Al-Aqsa alive in their sermons and supplications. It was also the first qibla (direction of prayer) for Muslims, which means that, before turning towards the Kaaba, the earliest Muslim community oriented its daily worship toward Jerusalem.

Okay. So when's the demolition of The Dome of The Rock and the rebuilding of Solomon's Temple?
Next year? Good!
This year? Even better! W00t! w00t!

 

[Kruska]

Which is why I explicitly prefaced my statement with "in this case". Did you want to talk about a different instance? We can. Name it.

You already lost your argument after I informed you that Israel has multiple-times restricted access to Muslims.
So case closed.

No. The armistice line was (is) explicitly NOT a border.

A de facto border, and doesn't change the fact that JORDAN was in control of those holy sites and solely administered the entire territory.

Yes. But NOW Jordan recognizes Israel within its original Mandate borders .

Please define Israels "original Mandate borders".

The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan NEVER had a legal territorial claim......

No - they had till 1988 , it's Israel that NEVER had a legal claim - until today

You've been arguing for pages about non-discriminatory freedom of access. Now you are double-talking. Explain yourself.

No - I never mentioned "discriminatory" - only that Israels restrictions towards Muslims to access their holy-sites in in breach of the Jordan-Israeli peace-treaty of October 26, 1994, - where Israel is to guarantee that Muslims can access their holy-sites.

Obviously you are confused again - mixing up the above mentioned treaty, with:
Jordan renounced its administrative and legal claims to the West Bank on 31.st July 1988. It never stated that the West-Bank is returned to Israel, but ceding its claim to the PLO, being the ONLY legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. And Jordan supports an independent Palestinian State in the borders before the six-day war of 1967.

And that's why Israel has NO legal claim towards the West-Bank nor East-Jerusalem, nor the Golan Heights nor Lebanon nor Gaza - NEVER had.

East Jerusalem has been under Israeli military occupation, though it is considered occupied Palestinian territory under international law. !!!! - That Zionists - don't give a rats ass about international law, is globally known.

 

[USAF 2023]

So what about it?- The Straits of Tiran were sovereign Egyptian territory at the time, resp. till 2017, then Saudi-Arabia - silly Zionist!

Another lie! They took control over the Straits in 1949-50 and CLAIMED Sovereignty Please tell us why the UN “ peacekeepers “ were there

 

[Kruska]

Another lie! They took control over the Straits in 1949-50 and CLAIMED Sovereignty Please tell us why the UN “ peacekeepers “ were there

Zionist and their ignorance towards FACTUAL history.

Egypt and Saudi Arabia clarified their sovereignty claims to the islands in 1954, when Egypt informed the UNSC that the two islands had been sovereign Egyptian territory since the delimitation of the frontier between Egypt and the Ottoman Empire in 1906.

 

[USAF 2023]

You already lost your argument after I informed you that Israel has multiple-times restricted access to Muslims.
So case closed.

A de facto border, and doesn't change the fact that JORDAN was in control of those holy sites and solely administered the entire territory.

Please define Israels "original Mandate borders".

No - they had till 1988 , it's Israel that NEVER had a legal claim - until today

No - I never mentioned "discriminatory" - only that Israels restrictions towards Muslims to access their holy-sites in in breach of the Jordan-Israeli peace-treaty of October 26, 1994, - where Israel is to guarantee that Muslims can access their holy-sites.

Obviously you are confused again - mixing up the above mentioned treaty, with:
Jordan renounced its administrative and legal claims to the West Bank on 31.st July 1988. It never stated that the West-Bank is returned to Israel, but ceding its claim to the PLO, being the ONLY legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. And Jordan supports an independent Palestinian State in the borders before the six-day war of 1967.

And that's why Israel has NO legal claim towards the West-Bank nor East-Jerusalem, nor the Golan Heights nor Lebanon nor Gaza - NEVER had.

East Jerusalem has been under Israeli military occupation, though it is considered occupied Palestinian territory under international law. !!!! - That Zionists - don't give a rats ass about international law, is globally known.

Thank you for being so stupid. Olmert suggested that E Jerusalem become an International City with their Capital there. Religious Freedom for everybody with other Countries making sure this takes place. Don’t remember all the Countries but two of them were The U, S. and Saudi Arabia

 

[USAF 2023]

Zionist and their ignorance towards FACTUAL history.

Egypt and Saudi Arabia clarified their sovereignty claims to the islands in 1954, when Egypt informed the UNSC that the two islands had been sovereign Egyptian territory since the delimitation of the frontier between Egypt and the Ottoman Empire in 1906.

Yes, THEY clarified their sovereignty. They “ see it and took it” Thank You

 

[Kruska]

Thank you for being so stupid. Olmert suggested that E Jerusalem become an International City with their Capital there. Religious Freedom for everybody with other Countries making sure this takes place. Don’t remember all the Countries but two of them were The U, S. and Saudi Arabia

Who is so stupid as to trust a Zionist???

And Olmert - hopped onto something that was already phrased 60 years before - aka UN 1947 Partition Plan

 

[Kruska]

Yes, THEY clarified their sovereignty. They “ see it and took it” Thank You

Hey stupid Zionist - it was already Egyptian sovereign territory since 1906.

And they RECONFIRMED it with Saudi-Arabia. With Saudi-Arabia gladly accepting it since they had no naval assets, and the Zionists already undertaking their "Greater Israel" action, via ILLEGALLY occupying in March 1949, the coastal village of Umm al-Rashrash, later renamed Eilat.

That Zionists reject historical FACTS is known, but at least try to read about them.

Instead of constantly wasting my time - in order to teach you those FACTS - which a Zionist will refute anyway.

 

[USAF 2023]

Hey stupid Zionist - it was already Egyptian sovereign territory since 1906.

And they RECONFIRMED it with Saudi-Arabia. With Saudi-Arabia gladly accepting it since they had no naval assets, and the Zionists already undertaking their "Greater Israel" action, via ILLEGALLY occupying in March 1949, the coastal village of Umm al-Rashrash, later renamed Eilat.

That Zionists reject historical FACTS is known, but at least try to read about them.

Instead of constantly wasting my time - in order to teach you those FACTS - which a Zionist will refute anyway.

Try reading a little more. You still can’t tell me why the UN “ peacekeepers “ left.

 

[USAF 2023]

Who is so stupid as to trust a Zionist???

And Olmert - hopped onto something that was already phrased 60 years before - aka UN 1947 Partition Plan

If that was the case ( which it wasn’t) the Palestinians should have jumped on it

 

[Kruska]

Try reading a little more. You still can’t tell me why the UN “ peacekeepers “ left.

There where NO UN peacekeepers on Tiran Island - Zionist dolt.

 

[Kruska]

If that was the case ( which it wasn’t)

Off course it was - illiterate Zionist dolt.

the Palestinians should have jumped on it

They have their shortcomings like everyone else - but no one is that stupid.
Furthermore in 1947 till 1964 there was NO Palestinian representation - you illiterate Zionist dolt.

 

[USAF 2023]

There where NO UN peacekeepers on Tiran Island - Zionist dolt.

You are an Ass Hole . Before Nasser did what he did the “ peacekeepers “ left, After the Suez Canal Crisis Israel was given assurances there would be no blockade Try reading

 

[USAF 2023]

Off course it was - illiterate Zionist dolt.

They have their shortcomings like everyone else - but no one is that stupid.
Furthermore in 1947 till 1964 there was NO Palestinian representation - you illiterate Zionist dolt.

Maybe you should learn how to read; you illiterate Moron No “ representation!” You mean if they had it they might have changed their mind?
The Palestinians had “ representation “ when Olmert’s proposal was struck down

 

[Kruska]

You are an Ass Hole . Before Nasser did what he did the “ peacekeepers “ left, After the Suez Canal Crisis Israel was given assurances there would be no blockade Try reading

No - but all Zionists are indeed.

Listen pucker, The Zionist had attacked Egypt in 1956 - so the UN asked if UN peacekeepers can be deployed on the Israel side - and guess what? the Zionists naturally refused because it would obstruct their plans for a "Greater Israel".

So peace-loving Egypt agreed for them to be stationed on Egyptian territory - and in 1967 with no recognizable threat from Israel (yeah those Zionist are damn good when it comes to surprise offensives) Nasser asked for some of the UN troops to be withdrawn.
However UN Secretary-General, U Thant then insisted to withdraw ALL of the UNEF troops - since again Israel rejected to have them stationed on their territory.

Once UNEF had withdrawn, the Zionists launched a full scale attack. (babbling until today about a "preemptive" strike). - whilst also "preemptively" attacking the USS Liberty - killing 34 innocent US souls and wounding another 180.

And Egypt had NEVER given an assurance regarding the Tiran strait - (Zionist liar) - that was exclusively given by the USA under Eisenhower. (Like now your loudmouth TACO regarding Hormuz) !!

As for the "representation" - learn to READ - there was NO representation on behalf of the Palestinians till the founding of the PLO in 1964.
And during Olmert's time - WHO would be stupid enough to ever trust a Zionist???

You don't know shit - only forward unsubstantiated Zionist babble and polemic nonsense.

BTW - I thought to have heard your Mom already knocking on your door a couple of times - telling you to switch of the light and go to bed. - GO!!

 

[USAF 2023]

Don’t you just love it that Israel controls Dumb Don?

Don’t like it because Israel wasn’t possibly attacked? Deal with it p

 

[gipper]

Don’t like it because Israel wasn’t possibly attacked? Deal with it p

Why do you support wars of aggression and mass murdering children?

 

[USAF 2023]

Why do you support wars of aggression and mass murdering children?

You wouldn’t mind a “ War of Aggression “ if Iran had the Nuclear Weapon and used it on Israel