Clinton vs. Fox News (good read)

Just mentioning the truth was chicken?
Yes or no: the only reason he asked that question was because he got the most email questions about it?

It's funny how naive people become given the circumstances.
 
I dunno. Not sure why it matters. We're talking about you and YOUR gay boyfriend. Sorry if I hit a nerve with the 1 minute man comment. I'm sure your sex life is great!

I know. I should just be proud of my choices. Regardless.
 
Not hide behind them.

Hide behind them?

Now the clintonites (carvelle) are accusing Wallace of being a right winger, even though he was on ABC for 25 years, and nobody could really say if he was left or right.

Carvelle and Bagala were on Oreilly, and they made an accusation, but when oreilly challenged them to come up with an example, ONE, they couldnt.
 
Hide behind them?

Now the clintonites (carvelle) are accusing Wallace of being a right winger, even though he was on ABC for 25 years, and nobody could really say if he was left or right.

Carvelle and Bagala were on Oreilly, and they made an accusation, but when oreilly challenged them to come up with an example, ONE, they couldnt.
Why is it that anyone who responds to my knock on Wallace automatically launches into tirades about Clinton and democrats? Does that somehow excuse Wallace's shitty journalism?
 
Why is it that anyone who responds to my knock on Wallace automatically launches into tirades about Clinton and democrats? Does that somehow excuse Wallace's shitty journalism?

What shitty journalism?
 
(the whole hiding behind viewers email thing)

Get over the strawman argument. He has taken full responsiblity for what he asked and what difference does it make anyway. Start a thread claiming Wallace is a shitty journalist and clean up the straw here on your way out.
 
Back
Top Bottom