JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,527
- 2,165
- Banned
- #181
Vigilante thinks his far right reactionaries are the conservative mainstream. 
They aren't.

They aren't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
V writes, "Starting with #4 and working our way up! Rep Frog Boy II is soooo fucking predictable! Damn, I fail with each one of these fucking subversives... I have a better failure rate with them, than the Obomanation does!"
V, only you and the far right are subversives.
Since you are in such a small minority, you are here for grins and chuckles only.
You sure are talking criticism of the Clintons personally...like a progressive would.
Vigilante thinks his far right reactionaries are the conservative mainstream.
They aren't.
V writes, "Starting with #4 and working our way up! Rep Frog Boy II is soooo fucking predictable! Damn, I fail with each one of these fucking subversives... I have a better failure rate with them, than the Obomanation does!"
V, only you and the far right are subversives.
Since you are in such a small minority, you are here for grins and chuckles only.
You sure are talking criticism of the Clintons personally...like a progressive would.
V writes, "Starting with #4 and working our way up! Rep Frog Boy II is soooo fucking predictable! Damn, I fail with each one of these fucking subversives... I have a better failure rate with them, than the Obomanation does!"
V, only you and the far right are subversives.
Since you are in such a small minority, you are here for grins and chuckles only.
You sure are talking criticism of the Clintons personally...like a progressive would.
I am taking it professionally because I know the libs are very good pointing out reactionary stupidity like Vigilante's to their party's good interest.
The reactionaries in our party, like you, like Vigilante, were great allies for the Dems, and terrible opponents for Romney and those of us in the GOP mainstream who supported him.
Yeah, whatever, Obama Boi.V writes, "Starting with #4 and working our way up! Rep Frog Boy II is soooo fucking predictable! Damn, I fail with each one of these fucking subversives... I have a better failure rate with them, than the Obomanation does!"
V, only you and the far right are subversives.
Since you are in such a small minority, you are here for grins and chuckles only.
You sure are talking criticism of the Clintons personally...like a progressive would.
I am taking it professionally because I know the libs are very good pointing out reactionary stupidity like Vigilante's to their party's good interest.
The reactionaries in our party, like you, like Vigilante, were great allies for the Dems, and terrible opponents for Romney and those of us in the GOP mainstream who supported him.
Dumbasscommunist says what?V writes, "Starting with #4 and working our way up! Rep Frog Boy II is soooo fucking predictable! Damn, I fail with each one of these fucking subversives... I have a better failure rate with them, than the Obomanation does!"
V, only you and the far right are subversives.
Since you are in such a small minority, you are here for grins and chuckles only.
You sure are talking criticism of the Clintons personally...like a progressive would.
Or maybe he's figured out 16 years late, attacking the Clintons on a personal level doesn't get you anywhere.
Look, guy, the only way you beat Hillary in 2016 is you get someone who voted for Obama in 2012 to vote for your guy.
Then you repeat that process 2.5 million times, the number of votes you'd have to change to put your guy in the majority.
The challenges you face are that your voters skew older and some of them are going to be taking a dirt nap in 2016.
So in short, you are going to have to win over 3 million people who voted for Obama in 2012 to vote for (Phil N. TheBlank) in 2016 over Hillary.
Impress us how you are going to do that. My guess is you will just sputter about those folks who voted for Obama.
Not only do you not know how to read English, or understand ...(In 2013, the percentage of Americans identifying themselves as conservatives was 38.) it has NOTHING to do with far right as his TERRORIST LEFT represents the majority of the RULING Democrat subversives!...What a fucking idiot!![]()
The moderate right know that you far reactionaries righties elect dem presidents.You sure are talking criticism of the Clintons personally...like a progressive would.
I am taking it professionally because I know the libs are very good pointing out reactionary stupidity like Vigilante's to their party's good interest.
The reactionaries in our party, like you, like Vigilante, were great allies for the Dems, and terrible opponents for Romney and those of us in the GOP mainstream who supported him.
I just love it when a commie subversive try's to tell us what is BEST for the Republicans..... They keep doing it, the very sad part is, they get the moderate right to usually go along with them....
]
Not only do you not know how to read English, or understand ...(In 2013, the percentage of Americans identifying themselves as conservatives was 38.) it has NOTHING to do with far right as his TERRORIST LEFT represents the majority of the RULING Democrat subversives!...What a fucking idiot!![]()
You are not part of the conservative mainstream, only a small minority of political thuggery on the far right.
That's really cool...Especially the fact that she looks zero like Webster Hubbell.
Not only do you not know how to read English, or understand ...(In 2013, the percentage of Americans identifying themselves as conservatives was 38.) it has NOTHING to do with far right as his TERRORIST LEFT represents the majority of the RULING Democrat subversives!...What a fucking idiot!![]()
You are not part of the conservative mainstream, only a small minority of political thuggery on the far right.
Thank you Mr. Goebbels! Keeping your grandfathers legacy in tact!
![]()
The moderate right know that you far reactionaries righties elect dem presidents.I am taking it professionally because I know the libs are very good pointing out reactionary stupidity like Vigilante's to their party's good interest.
The reactionaries in our party, like you, like Vigilante, were great allies for the Dems, and terrible opponents for Romney and those of us in the GOP mainstream who supported him.
I just love it when a commie subversive try's to tell us what is BEST for the Republicans..... They keep doing it, the very sad part is, they get the moderate right to usually go along with them....
]
Not only do you not know how to read English, or understand ...(In 2013, the percentage of Americans identifying themselves as conservatives was 38.) it has NOTHING to do with far right as his TERRORIST LEFT represents the majority of the RULING Democrat subversives!...What a fucking idiot!![]()
You are not part of the conservative mainstream, only a small minority of political thuggery on the far right.
Thank you Mr. Goebbels! Keeping your grandfathers legacy in tact!
![]()
You are not part of the conservative mainstream, only a small minority of political thuggery on the far right.
Thank you Mr. Goebbels! Keeping your grandfathers legacy in tact!
![]()
That is you with the sign talking into the mirror. Godwin's law, you lose.![]()
Dumbasscommunist says what?You sure are talking criticism of the Clintons personally...like a progressive would.
Or maybe he's figured out 16 years late, attacking the Clintons on a personal level doesn't get you anywhere.
Look, guy, the only way you beat Hillary in 2016 is you get someone who voted for Obama in 2012 to vote for your guy.
Then you repeat that process 2.5 million times, the number of votes you'd have to change to put your guy in the majority.
The challenges you face are that your voters skew older and some of them are going to be taking a dirt nap in 2016.
So in short, you are going to have to win over 3 million people who voted for Obama in 2012 to vote for (Phil N. TheBlank) in 2016 over Hillary.
Impress us how you are going to do that. My guess is you will just sputter about those folks who voted for Obama.
[
Was Ronald Reagan alive and president before you were born, subversive?
Why do you keep trying to play at being a moderate Republican? We all know you're a full Blown Obuma Zombie, if you weren't you would have STFU a long time ago!![]()
Dumbasscommunist says what?Or maybe he's figured out 16 years late, attacking the Clintons on a personal level doesn't get you anywhere.
Look, guy, the only way you beat Hillary in 2016 is you get someone who voted for Obama in 2012 to vote for your guy.
Then you repeat that process 2.5 million times, the number of votes you'd have to change to put your guy in the majority.
The challenges you face are that your voters skew older and some of them are going to be taking a dirt nap in 2016.
So in short, you are going to have to win over 3 million people who voted for Obama in 2012 to vote for (Phil N. TheBlank) in 2016 over Hillary.
Impress us how you are going to do that. My guess is you will just sputter about those folks who voted for Obama.
Whenever you use the word "Communist" it means you didn't have an answer to the obvious statement.
Okay, guy, one more time.
How do you get 3 million people who voted for Obama in 2012 to vote for your guy.
Knock yourself out. I'd be interested in hearing your ideas.