Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm gonna kill your thread. From the same article.
"Clinton may have been
Be less slick and/or less stupid. Delete your thread.
Read more: Clinton: 'We didn't lose a single person' in Libya
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
How could she make such an absurd statement? Did she forget the four dead Americans thanks to her incompetence and warmongering policies?I'm gonna kill your thread. From the same article.
"Clinton may have been referring strictly to the U.S.-backed overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, which indeed saw no loss of American lives and cost just around $1 billion.
There. Your thread is dead. You wanted readers of this board to believe that Clinton was referring to the conflict on Lybia in general, when in fact she was referring to a single operation (i.e. the move against Qaddafi).
Be less slick and/or less stupid. Delete your thread.
Read more: Clinton: 'We didn't lose a single person' in Libya
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
How could she make such an absurd statement? Did she forget the four dead Americans thanks to her incompetence and warmongering policies?I'm gonna kill your thread. From the same article.
"Clinton may have been referring strictly to the U.S.-backed overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, which indeed saw no loss of American lives and cost just around $1 billion.
There. Your thread is dead. You wanted readers of this board to believe that Clinton was referring to the conflict on Lybia in general, when in fact she was referring to a single operation (i.e. the move against Qaddafi).
Be less slick and/or less stupid. Delete your thread.
Read more: Clinton: 'We didn't lose a single person' in Libya
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
If an R made such an absurd statement, the MSM would have crucified him/her and libs like you would have done the same.
The real question should be, "What benefit did the U.S. taxpayer get for the billion dollars spent killing Qaddafi and destabilizing Libya"? ......
She didn't forget about the four deaths, because she was not referring to those four deaths, moron. Learn how to read.How could she make such an absurd statement? Did she forget the four dead Americans thanks to her incompetence and warmongering policies?I'm gonna kill your thread. From the same article.
"Clinton may have been referring strictly to the U.S.-backed overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, which indeed saw no loss of American lives and cost just around $1 billion.
There. Your thread is dead. You wanted readers of this board to believe that Clinton was referring to the conflict on Lybia in general, when in fact she was referring to a single operation (i.e. the move against Qaddafi).
Be less slick and/or less stupid. Delete your thread.
Read more: Clinton: 'We didn't lose a single person' in Libya
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
If an R made such an absurd statement, the MSM would have crucified him/her and libs like you would have done the same.
That question is NEVER asked. Our government's constant interventions are NEVER beneficial to the average American taxpayer, but they do enrich and empower the State and it's cronies, which is why interventionism continues unabated...and wait till Cankles is POTUS...intervention on steroids.The real question should be, "What benefit did the U.S. taxpayer get for the billion dollars spent killing Qaddafi and destabilizing Libya"? ......
What difference does it make?I'm gonna kill your thread. From the same article.
"Clinton may have been referring strictly to the U.S.-backed overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, which indeed saw no loss of American lives and cost just around $1 billion.
There. Your thread is dead. You wanted readers of this board to believe that Clinton was referring to the conflict on Lybia in general, when in fact she was referring to a single operation (i.e. the move against Qaddafi).
Be less slick and/or less stupid. Delete your thread.
Read more: Clinton: 'We didn't lose a single person' in Libya
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
Stevens wasn't murdered. He died of smoke inhalation:
She didn't forget about the four deaths, because she was not referring to those four deaths, moron. Learn how to read.How could she make such an absurd statement? Did she forget the four dead Americans thanks to her incompetence and warmongering policies?I'm gonna kill your thread. From the same article.
"Clinton may have been referring strictly to the U.S.-backed overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, which indeed saw no loss of American lives and cost just around $1 billion.
There. Your thread is dead. You wanted readers of this board to believe that Clinton was referring to the conflict on Lybia in general, when in fact she was referring to a single operation (i.e. the move against Qaddafi).
Be less slick and/or less stupid. Delete your thread.
Read more: Clinton: 'We didn't lose a single person' in Libya
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
If an R made such an absurd statement, the MSM would have crucified him/her and libs like you would have done the same.
It's like you saying that I forgot about Lincoln's death because I was talking about FDR. Stupid.
Well you can make excuses for her, but it won't fly here.She didn't forget about the four deaths, because she was not referring to those four deaths, moron. Learn how to read.How could she make such an absurd statement? Did she forget the four dead Americans thanks to her incompetence and warmongering policies?I'm gonna kill your thread. From the same article.
"Clinton may have been referring strictly to the U.S.-backed overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, which indeed saw no loss of American lives and cost just around $1 billion.
There. Your thread is dead. You wanted readers of this board to believe that Clinton was referring to the conflict on Lybia in general, when in fact she was referring to a single operation (i.e. the move against Qaddafi).
Be less slick and/or less stupid. Delete your thread.
Read more: Clinton: 'We didn't lose a single person' in Libya
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
If an R made such an absurd statement, the MSM would have crucified him/her and libs like you would have done the same.
It's like you saying that I forgot about Lincoln's death because I was talking about FDR. Stupid.
She didn't forget about the four deaths, because she was not referring to those four deaths, moron. Learn how to read.How could she make such an absurd statement? Did she forget the four dead Americans thanks to her incompetence and warmongering policies?I'm gonna kill your thread. From the same article.
"Clinton may have been referring strictly to the U.S.-backed overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, which indeed saw no loss of American lives and cost just around $1 billion.
There. Your thread is dead. You wanted readers of this board to believe that Clinton was referring to the conflict on Lybia in general, when in fact she was referring to a single operation (i.e. the move against Qaddafi).
Be less slick and/or less stupid. Delete your thread.
Read more: Clinton: 'We didn't lose a single person' in Libya
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
If an R made such an absurd statement, the MSM would have crucified him/her and libs like you would have done the same.
It's like you saying that I forgot about Lincoln's death because I was talking about FDR. Stupid.
I know looneys like a prez took out of context the mission accomplished banner that was celebrating the end of that crews mission. They spun it around to say he meant the end of the Iraq war. Looneys will be looney.How could she make such an absurd statement? Did she forget the four dead Americans thanks to her incompetence and warmongering policies?I'm gonna kill your thread. From the same article.
"Clinton may have been referring strictly to the U.S.-backed overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, which indeed saw no loss of American lives and cost just around $1 billion.
There. Your thread is dead. You wanted readers of this board to believe that Clinton was referring to the conflict on Lybia in general, when in fact she was referring to a single operation (i.e. the move against Qaddafi).
Be less slick and/or less stupid. Delete your thread.
Read more: Clinton: 'We didn't lose a single person' in Libya
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
If an R made such an absurd statement, the MSM would have crucified him/her and libs like you would have done the same.
I'm gonna kill your thread. From the same article.
"Clinton may have been referring strictly to the U.S.-backed overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, which indeed saw no loss of American lives and cost just around $1 billion.
There. Your thread is dead. You wanted readers of this board to believe that Clinton was referring to the conflict on Lybia in general, when in fact she was referring to a single operation (i.e. the move against Qaddafi).
Be less slick and/or less stupid. Delete your thread.
Read more: Clinton: 'We didn't lose a single person' in Libya
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook