Clinton Foundation: Only 6% Goes to Direct Aid. The Rest? Their Personal Piggie Bank.

[Dante]

The Clinton's must of modeled their expenses after SarahPac.

"Must have" You are illiterate as well as ignorant.
What does Sarah Palin have to do with anything? Nothing.
So focus on the issue here.
The Clinton Foundation is not a foundation at all. It is merely a PAC designed to give tax free income to support the Clinton lifestyle, which resembles that of the uber-wealthy. Meanwhile Hillary is roaming around in a luxury automobile (when she's not flying first class) pretending to be an ordinary American.
Does anyone really think people will be fooled by this?

Hey folks it's Rabbi!
Considering SarahPac also contributes almost nothing financially to it's advertised cause, it can be used a tie-in to this thread as a "per-example" of the OP implied Clinton scam. Using examples in the course of discussion, is nothing new, I'd bet you have done it yourself thousands of times and that would be just on these boards.
Therefore, implying illiteracy and ignorance is complete hypocrisy. Way to go Rabbi!

No, idiot. You are illiterate because you cant tell the difference between of and have.
If Palin's PAC did that does that make the Clinton's PAC OK? You are a lying little piece of sniveling shit hypocrite. Sarah is not running for the presidency. Clinton is. Sarah did not sell out government favorites in exchange for contributions to her PAC, Clinton did. Sarah's PAC is not resubmitting new tax reports to reflect foreign contributions which were omitted in previous years, Clinton's is.
See the difference, you worthless piece of shit? Go ahea, post a graph so your humiliation is complete.

A PAC is not a charitable foundation. Sarah had a political action committee. That's a PAC. The Clintons had a charitable foundation that was supposed to collect donations to be spent on charitable works not political campaigns.

Only the Clinton foundation did no such thing.

exactly

 

[The Rabbi]

The Clinton's must of modeled their expenses after SarahPac.

"Must have" You are illiterate as well as ignorant.
What does Sarah Palin have to do with anything? Nothing.
So focus on the issue here.
The Clinton Foundation is not a foundation at all. It is merely a PAC designed to give tax free income to support the Clinton lifestyle, which resembles that of the uber-wealthy. Meanwhile Hillary is roaming around in a luxury automobile (when she's not flying first class) pretending to be an ordinary American.
Does anyone really think people will be fooled by this?

Hey folks it's Rabbi!
Considering SarahPac also contributes almost nothing financially to it's advertised cause, it can be used a tie-in to this thread as a "per-example" of the OP implied Clinton scam. Using examples in the course of discussion, is nothing new, I'd bet you have done it yourself thousands of times and that would be just on these boards.
Therefore, implying illiteracy and ignorance is complete hypocrisy. Way to go Rabbi!

No, idiot. You are illiterate because you cant tell the difference between of and have.
If Palin's PAC did that does that make the Clinton's PAC OK? You are a lying little piece of sniveling shit hypocrite. Sarah is not running for the presidency. Clinton is. Sarah did not sell out government favorites in exchange for contributions to her PAC, Clinton did. Sarah's PAC is not resubmitting new tax reports to reflect foreign contributions which were omitted in previous years, Clinton's is.
See the difference, you worthless piece of shit? Go ahea, post a graph so your humiliation is complete.

A PAC is not a charitable foundation. Sarah had a political action committee. That's a PAC. The Clintons had a charitable foundation that was supposed to collect donations to be spent on charitable works not political campaigns.

Only the Clinton foundation did no such thing.

exactly

So you agree that the Clintons are worthless scumbags and Palin has zero to do with it?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Hillary should have ppl behind her on stage that benefited from her foundation like obama doez

She always has the people n stage who benefitted from her... They're all lined up back there, 100% of 'em.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The Clinton's must of modeled their expenses after SarahPac.

"Must have" You are illiterate as well as ignorant.
What does Sarah Palin have to do with anything? Nothing.
So focus on the issue here.
The Clinton Foundation is not a foundation at all. It is merely a PAC designed to give tax free income to support the Clinton lifestyle, which resembles that of the uber-wealthy. Meanwhile Hillary is roaming around in a luxury automobile (when she's not flying first class) pretending to be an ordinary American.
Does anyone really think people will be fooled by this?

If true, this should disqualify her from nomination.

If false, everyone who has knowingly engaged in the falsehood is open to court action.

Jake the article is from the NY Post. The data is the Clinton Foundation Federal Tax Return.

I would say it's pretty damn legit.

No it is not.... There is not one piece of evidence just here say so far from this book who claims it is factual.... geeeez lets find facts people.

The article is based upon the Clinton Foundation Tax Returns. It's not even a debatable point.

Understand that since the article was published the Foundation has made a big deal about their need to revise their returns....

But ... ROFL! ... IMAGINE the depths of foolishness wherein some poor loser would DEFEND the CLINTONS!??


Now THAT is PITIFUL!

 

[The Rabbi]

The Clinton's must of modeled their expenses after SarahPac.

"Must have" You are illiterate as well as ignorant.
What does Sarah Palin have to do with anything? Nothing.
So focus on the issue here.
The Clinton Foundation is not a foundation at all. It is merely a PAC designed to give tax free income to support the Clinton lifestyle, which resembles that of the uber-wealthy. Meanwhile Hillary is roaming around in a luxury automobile (when she's not flying first class) pretending to be an ordinary American.
Does anyone really think people will be fooled by this?

If true, this should disqualify her from nomination.

If false, everyone who has knowingly engaged in the falsehood is open to court action.

Jake the article is from the NY Post. The data is the Clinton Foundation Federal Tax Return.

I would say it's pretty damn legit.

No it is not.... There is not one piece of evidence just here say so far from this book who claims it is factual.... geeeez lets find facts people.

The article is based upon the Clinton Foundation Tax Returns. It's not even a debatable point.

Understand that since the article was published the Foundation has made a big deal about their need to revise their returns....

But ... ROFL! ... IMAGINE the depths of foolishness wherein some poor loser would DEFEND the CLINTONS!??


Now THAT is PITIFUL!

The amount of sheer denial is staggering here. Dems know if Hillary is out they have zero chance of winning in 2016. The Obamas have hollowed out the party so they have no one on the national stage to turn to. They sacrificed all those people on the altar of progressive agenda items.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I will vote for any GOP that is not in the far right clown car. Now imagine paying serious attention to someone like Keys. Now THAT is PITIFUL!

 

[Papageorgio]

Charity watchdog Clinton Foundation a slush fund New York Post


Well....is anyone surprised by anything the Clinton's do? According to the NY Post the Clinton Foundation took in $140 million in 2013. So what did the people get in direct aid from the $140 million?

Per tax records $9 million. That is a 6.4% return on money given.


Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation has been placed on a charity watch for "problematic activities. Quote:

"Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years."
That

******* thieves.....pure ******* thieves....

Liar!

Please show us the lie.

Page 16: Program expenses: $196,633,380, Fundraising expenses $10,129,160, Salaries and benefits $16,633,562, Total $222,396,102. By my calculations, that's 88% of the money going to programing, which is a decent return.

The Clintons would have to be idiots to set up a charity as a personal slush fund given that everything they've ever done over the past 25 years has been scrutinized, studied, parsed and discussed, and they knew she would be running for office and this would come up.

There is no way she can legally set up her own PAC, so that part is a total lie. But it's not like this is the first time right wingers have lied about the Clintons.

Who can forget that the New York Times said that her use of private email was illegal and she could go to jail for it, and then they had to retract that statement because it was false. She broke no laws and was in no danger of going to jail.

I know you lot are desperate to get something, anything on Hillary to disqualify her candidacy but seriously people. check the facts. Google is your friend. If only you'd bother to use it.

It shows less than $55 million went to any charity, rest is salary, office expenditures, office equipment, property, travel and on and on which puts it less than 25%.

As far as the rest of your bullshit, I want Hillary as the Democratic nominee, her connections with Wall St. and big business, she will work with them as she owes them.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Charity watchdog Clinton Foundation a slush fund New York Post


Well....is anyone surprised by anything the Clinton's do? According to the NY Post the Clinton Foundation took in $140 million in 2013. So what did the people get in direct aid from the $140 million?

Per tax records $9 million. That is a 6.4% return on money given.


Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation has been placed on a charity watch for "problematic activities. Quote:

"Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years."
That

******* thieves.....pure ******* thieves....

Liar!

Please show us the lie.

Page 16: Program expenses: $196,633,380, Fundraising expenses $10,129,160, Salaries and benefits $16,633,562, Total $222,396,102. By my calculations, that's 88% of the money going to programing, which is a decent return.

The Clintons would have to be idiots to set up a charity as a personal slush fund given that everything they've ever done over the past 25 years has been scrutinized, studied, parsed and discussed, and they knew she would be running for office and this would come up.

There is no way she can legally set up her own PAC, so that part is a total lie. But it's not like this is the first time right wingers have lied about the Clintons.

Who can forget that the New York Times said that her use of private email was illegal and she could go to jail for it, and then they had to retract that statement because it was false. She broke no laws and was in no danger of going to jail.

I know you lot are desperate to get something, anything on Hillary to disqualify her candidacy but seriously people. check the facts. Google is your friend. If only you'd bother to use it.

It shows less than $55 million went to any charity, rest is salary, office expenditures, office equipment, property, travel and on and on which puts it less than 25%.

As far as the rest of your bullshit, I want Hillary as the Democratic nominee, her connections with Wall St. and big business, she will work with them as she owes them.

Monica Lewinsky's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife, is not going to be nominated for President... She's going to be too busy running down those emails she sent out to thousands of servers.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Charity watchdog Clinton Foundation a slush fund New York Post


Well....is anyone surprised by anything the Clinton's do? According to the NY Post the Clinton Foundation took in $140 million in 2013. So what did the people get in direct aid from the $140 million?

Per tax records $9 million. That is a 6.4% return on money given.


Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation has been placed on a charity watch for "problematic activities. Quote:

"Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years."
That

******* thieves.....pure ******* thieves....

Liar!

Please show us the lie.

Page 16: Program expenses: $196,633,380, Fundraising expenses $10,129,160, Salaries and benefits $16,633,562, Total $222,396,102. By my calculations, that's 88% of the money going to programing, which is a decent return.

The Clintons would have to be idiots to set up a charity as a personal slush fund given that everything they've ever done over the past 25 years has been scrutinized, studied, parsed and discussed, and they knew she would be running for office and this would come up.

There is no way she can legally set up her own PAC, so that part is a total lie. But it's not like this is the first time right wingers have lied about the Clintons.

Who can forget that the New York Times said that her use of private email was illegal and she could go to jail for it, and then they had to retract that statement because it was false. She broke no laws and was in no danger of going to jail.

I know you lot are desperate to get something, anything on Hillary to disqualify her candidacy but seriously people. check the facts. Google is your friend. If only you'd bother to use it.

It shows less than $55 million went to any charity, rest is salary, office expenditures, office equipment, property, travel and on and on which puts it less than 25%.

As far as the rest of your bullshit, I want Hillary as the Democratic nominee, her connections with Wall St. and big business, she will work with them as she owes them.

EXPENSES (PERCENT OF TOTAL EXPENSES)


PROGRAM SERVICES

Clinton Health Access Initiative $127,781,347 (57.4%)

Clinton Global Initiative $23,684,078 (10.6%)

Clinton Presidential Center $12,288,987 (5.5%)

Clinton Climate Initiative $8,406,801 (3.8%)

Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership $5,039,288 (2.3%)

Clinton Development Initiative $2,575,401 (1.2%)

Clinton Health Matters Initiative $1,676,729 (0.8%)

Other Programs $15,180,749 (6.8%)

Management and General $15,633,562 (7%)

Fundraising $10,129,160 (4.5%)

Provision for Uncollectible Pledges $225,000 (0.1%)

Total Expenses $222,621,102

 

[WelfareQueen]

Charity watchdog Clinton Foundation a slush fund New York Post


Well....is anyone surprised by anything the Clinton's do? According to the NY Post the Clinton Foundation took in $140 million in 2013. So what did the people get in direct aid from the $140 million?

Per tax records $9 million. That is a 6.4% return on money given.


Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation has been placed on a charity watch for "problematic activities. Quote:

"Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years."
That

******* thieves.....pure ******* thieves....

Liar!

Please show us the lie.

Page 16: Program expenses: $196,633,380, Fundraising expenses $10,129,160, Salaries and benefits $16,633,562, Total $222,396,102. By my calculations, that's 88% of the money going to programing, which is a decent return.

The Clintons would have to be idiots to set up a charity as a personal slush fund given that everything they've ever done over the past 25 years has been scrutinized, studied, parsed and discussed, and they knew she would be running for office and this would come up.

There is no way she can legally set up her own PAC, so that part is a total lie. But it's not like this is the first time right wingers have lied about the Clintons.

Who can forget that the New York Times said that her use of private email was illegal and she could go to jail for it, and then they had to retract that statement because it was false. She broke no laws and was in no danger of going to jail.

I know you lot are desperate to get something, anything on Hillary to disqualify her candidacy but seriously people. check the facts. Google is your friend. If only you'd bother to use it.

It shows less than $55 million went to any charity, rest is salary, office expenditures, office equipment, property, travel and on and on which puts it less than 25%.

As far as the rest of your bullshit, I want Hillary as the Democratic nominee, her connections with Wall St. and big business, she will work with them as she owes them.

EXPENSES (PERCENT OF TOTAL EXPENSES)


PROGRAM SERVICES

Clinton Health Access Initiative $127,781,347 (57.4%)

Clinton Global Initiative $23,684,078 (10.6%)

Clinton Presidential Center $12,288,987 (5.5%)

Clinton Climate Initiative $8,406,801 (3.8%)

Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership $5,039,288 (2.3%)

Clinton Development Initiative $2,575,401 (1.2%)

Clinton Health Matters Initiative $1,676,729 (0.8%)

Other Programs $15,180,749 (6.8%)

Management and General $15,633,562 (7%)

Fundraising $10,129,160 (4.5%)

Provision for Uncollectible Pledges $225,000 (0.1%)

Total Expenses $222,621,102

So your saying they flat out lied on their Federal Tax Return? Sorry....you can't have it both ways.

 

[dilloduck]

The Clinton's must of modeled their expenses after SarahPac.

"Must have" You are illiterate as well as ignorant.
What does Sarah Palin have to do with anything? Nothing.
So focus on the issue here.
The Clinton Foundation is not a foundation at all. It is merely a PAC designed to give tax free income to support the Clinton lifestyle, which resembles that of the uber-wealthy. Meanwhile Hillary is roaming around in a luxury automobile (when she's not flying first class) pretending to be an ordinary American.
Does anyone really think people will be fooled by this?

No be she's not a conservative----that's all it takes.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Charity watchdog Clinton Foundation a slush fund New York Post


Well....is anyone surprised by anything the Clinton's do? According to the NY Post the Clinton Foundation took in $140 million in 2013. So what did the people get in direct aid from the $140 million?

Per tax records $9 million. That is a 6.4% return on money given.


Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation has been placed on a charity watch for "problematic activities. Quote:

"Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years."
That

******* thieves.....pure ******* thieves....

Liar!

Please show us the lie.

Page 16: Program expenses: $196,633,380, Fundraising expenses $10,129,160, Salaries and benefits $16,633,562, Total $222,396,102. By my calculations, that's 88% of the money going to programing, which is a decent return.

The Clintons would have to be idiots to set up a charity as a personal slush fund given that everything they've ever done over the past 25 years has been scrutinized, studied, parsed and discussed, and they knew she would be running for office and this would come up.

There is no way she can legally set up her own PAC, so that part is a total lie. But it's not like this is the first time right wingers have lied about the Clintons.

Who can forget that the New York Times said that her use of private email was illegal and she could go to jail for it, and then they had to retract that statement because it was false. She broke no laws and was in no danger of going to jail.

I know you lot are desperate to get something, anything on Hillary to disqualify her candidacy but seriously people. check the facts. Google is your friend. If only you'd bother to use it.

Not according to their Federal Tax Return. Now the Clinton's wouldn't lie to Feds...would they?

So tell me....which is true?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Charity watchdog Clinton Foundation a slush fund New York Post


Well....is anyone surprised by anything the Clinton's do? According to the NY Post the Clinton Foundation took in $140 million in 2013. So what did the people get in direct aid from the $140 million?

Per tax records $9 million. That is a 6.4% return on money given.


Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation has been placed on a charity watch for "problematic activities. Quote:

"Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years."
That

******* thieves.....pure ******* thieves....

Liar!

Please show us the lie.

Page 16: Program expenses: $196,633,380, Fundraising expenses $10,129,160, Salaries and benefits $16,633,562, Total $222,396,102. By my calculations, that's 88% of the money going to programing, which is a decent return.

The Clintons would have to be idiots to set up a charity as a personal slush fund given that everything they've ever done over the past 25 years has been scrutinized, studied, parsed and discussed, and they knew she would be running for office and this would come up.

There is no way she can legally set up her own PAC, so that part is a total lie. But it's not like this is the first time right wingers have lied about the Clintons.

Who can forget that the New York Times said that her use of private email was illegal and she could go to jail for it, and then they had to retract that statement because it was false. She broke no laws and was in no danger of going to jail.

I know you lot are desperate to get something, anything on Hillary to disqualify her candidacy but seriously people. check the facts. Google is your friend. If only you'd bother to use it.

It shows less than $55 million went to any charity, rest is salary, office expenditures, office equipment, property, travel and on and on which puts it less than 25%.

As far as the rest of your bullshit, I want Hillary as the Democratic nominee, her connections with Wall St. and big business, she will work with them as she owes them.

EXPENSES (PERCENT OF TOTAL EXPENSES)


PROGRAM SERVICES

Clinton Health Access Initiative $127,781,347 (57.4%)

Clinton Global Initiative $23,684,078 (10.6%)

Clinton Presidential Center $12,288,987 (5.5%)

Clinton Climate Initiative $8,406,801 (3.8%)

Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership $5,039,288 (2.3%)

Clinton Development Initiative $2,575,401 (1.2%)

Clinton Health Matters Initiative $1,676,729 (0.8%)

Other Programs $15,180,749 (6.8%)

Management and General $15,633,562 (7%)

Fundraising $10,129,160 (4.5%)

Provision for Uncollectible Pledges $225,000 (0.1%)

Total Expenses $222,621,102

ROFLMNAO! Adorable...

Who could have predicted that the same people that promote perversion would be the one's promoting Monica Lewinsky's Ex-boyfriend's Wife?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Liar!

Please show us the lie.

Page 16: Program expenses: $196,633,380, Fundraising expenses $10,129,160, Salaries and benefits $16,633,562, Total $222,396,102. By my calculations, that's 88% of the money going to programing, which is a decent return.

The Clintons would have to be idiots to set up a charity as a personal slush fund given that everything they've ever done over the past 25 years has been scrutinized, studied, parsed and discussed, and they knew she would be running for office and this would come up.

There is no way she can legally set up her own PAC, so that part is a total lie. But it's not like this is the first time right wingers have lied about the Clintons.

Who can forget that the New York Times said that her use of private email was illegal and she could go to jail for it, and then they had to retract that statement because it was false. She broke no laws and was in no danger of going to jail.

I know you lot are desperate to get something, anything on Hillary to disqualify her candidacy but seriously people. check the facts. Google is your friend. If only you'd bother to use it.

It shows less than $55 million went to any charity, rest is salary, office expenditures, office equipment, property, travel and on and on which puts it less than 25%.

As far as the rest of your bullshit, I want Hillary as the Democratic nominee, her connections with Wall St. and big business, she will work with them as she owes them.

EXPENSES (PERCENT OF TOTAL EXPENSES)


PROGRAM SERVICES

Clinton Health Access Initiative $127,781,347 (57.4%)

Clinton Global Initiative $23,684,078 (10.6%)

Clinton Presidential Center $12,288,987 (5.5%)

Clinton Climate Initiative $8,406,801 (3.8%)

Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership $5,039,288 (2.3%)

Clinton Development Initiative $2,575,401 (1.2%)

Clinton Health Matters Initiative $1,676,729 (0.8%)

Other Programs $15,180,749 (6.8%)

Management and General $15,633,562 (7%)

Fundraising $10,129,160 (4.5%)

Provision for Uncollectible Pledges $225,000 (0.1%)

Total Expenses $222,621,102

ROFLMNAO! Adorable...

Who could have predicted that the same people that promote perversion would be the one's promoting Monica Lewinsky's Ex-boyfriend's Wife?

This from the guy who thinks Jesus was abnormal because he was celibate.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Charity watchdog Clinton Foundation a slush fund New York Post


Well....is anyone surprised by anything the Clinton's do? According to the NY Post the Clinton Foundation took in $140 million in 2013. So what did the people get in direct aid from the $140 million?

Per tax records $9 million. That is a 6.4% return on money given.


Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation has been placed on a charity watch for "problematic activities. Quote:

"Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years."
That

******* thieves.....pure ******* thieves....

Liar!

Please show us the lie.

Page 16: Program expenses: $196,633,380, Fundraising expenses $10,129,160, Salaries and benefits $16,633,562, Total $222,396,102. By my calculations, that's 88% of the money going to programing, which is a decent return.

The Clintons would have to be idiots to set up a charity as a personal slush fund given that everything they've ever done over the past 25 years has been scrutinized, studied, parsed and discussed, and they knew she would be running for office and this would come up.

There is no way she can legally set up her own PAC, so that part is a total lie. But it's not like this is the first time right wingers have lied about the Clintons.

Who can forget that the New York Times said that her use of private email was illegal and she could go to jail for it, and then they had to retract that statement because it was false. She broke no laws and was in no danger of going to jail.

I know you lot are desperate to get something, anything on Hillary to disqualify her candidacy but seriously people. check the facts. Google is your friend. If only you'd bother to use it.

Not according to their Federal Tax Return. Now the Clinton's wouldn't lie to Feds...would they?

So tell me....which is true?

Benghazi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Dante]

Unwatch Thread

Ha...ha...ha....

 

[CowboyTed]

Charity watchdog Clinton Foundation a slush fund New York Post


Well....is anyone surprised by anything the Clinton's do? According to the NY Post the Clinton Foundation took in $140 million in 2013. So what did the people get in direct aid from the $140 million?

Per tax records $9 million. That is a 6.4% return on money given.


Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation has been placed on a charity watch for "problematic activities. Quote:

"Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years."
That

******* thieves.....pure ******* thieves....

Liar!

Please show us the lie.

Page 16: Program expenses: $196,633,380, Fundraising expenses $10,129,160, Salaries and benefits $16,633,562, Total $222,396,102. By my calculations, that's 88% of the money going to programing, which is a decent return.

The Clintons would have to be idiots to set up a charity as a personal slush fund given that everything they've ever done over the past 25 years has been scrutinized, studied, parsed and discussed, and they knew she would be running for office and this would come up.

There is no way she can legally set up her own PAC, so that part is a total lie. But it's not like this is the first time right wingers have lied about the Clintons.

Who can forget that the New York Times said that her use of private email was illegal and she could go to jail for it, and then they had to retract that statement because it was false. She broke no laws and was in no danger of going to jail.

I know you lot are desperate to get something, anything on Hillary to disqualify her candidacy but seriously people. check the facts. Google is your friend. If only you'd bother to use it.

It shows less than $55 million went to any charity, rest is salary, office expenditures, office equipment, property, travel and on and on which puts it less than 25%.

As far as the rest of your bullshit, I want Hillary as the Democratic nominee, her connections with Wall St. and big business, she will work with them as she owes them.

Sticking your head in the sand and saying I can't see it, just puts your ass in the air...

There is nothing here AGAIN....

The RW has been on a hard on for weeks trying to throw as much mud as possible... The didn't even wait to go dirty, they just continued on from Obama...

And rightly so the polls are showing that their endless lies are being found out... Their tactic of telling a lie and keep repeating it (a NAZI trick) is starting to wain...

Even the most casual infromed voter knows that the GOP and RW are just lieing and lieing...

The places that caught them are Trickle dow economics, Iraq and the economy crisis.... They are also delivering next to nothing, heck even Obama is rarely using the Veto, only twice this year so far...

 

[Papageorgio]

Charity watchdog Clinton Foundation a slush fund New York Post


Well....is anyone surprised by anything the Clinton's do? According to the NY Post the Clinton Foundation took in $140 million in 2013. So what did the people get in direct aid from the $140 million?

Per tax records $9 million. That is a 6.4% return on money given.


Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation has been placed on a charity watch for "problematic activities. Quote:

"Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years."
That

******* thieves.....pure ******* thieves....

Liar!

Please show us the lie.

Page 16: Program expenses: $196,633,380, Fundraising expenses $10,129,160, Salaries and benefits $16,633,562, Total $222,396,102. By my calculations, that's 88% of the money going to programing, which is a decent return.

The Clintons would have to be idiots to set up a charity as a personal slush fund given that everything they've ever done over the past 25 years has been scrutinized, studied, parsed and discussed, and they knew she would be running for office and this would come up.

There is no way she can legally set up her own PAC, so that part is a total lie. But it's not like this is the first time right wingers have lied about the Clintons.

Who can forget that the New York Times said that her use of private email was illegal and she could go to jail for it, and then they had to retract that statement because it was false. She broke no laws and was in no danger of going to jail.

I know you lot are desperate to get something, anything on Hillary to disqualify her candidacy but seriously people. check the facts. Google is your friend. If only you'd bother to use it.

It shows less than $55 million went to any charity, rest is salary, office expenditures, office equipment, property, travel and on and on which puts it less than 25%.

As far as the rest of your bullshit, I want Hillary as the Democratic nominee, her connections with Wall St. and big business, she will work with them as she owes them.

Sticking your head in the sand and saying I can't see it, just puts your ass in the air...

There is nothing here AGAIN....

The RW has been on a hard on for weeks trying to throw as much mud as possible... The didn't even wait to go dirty, they just continued on from Obama...

And rightly so the polls are showing that their endless lies are being found out... Their tactic of telling a lie and keep repeating it (a NAZI trick) is starting to wain...

Even the most casual infromed voter knows that the GOP and RW are just lieing and lieing...

The places that caught them are Trickle dow economics, Iraq and the economy crisis.... They are also delivering next to nothing, heck even Obama is rarely using the Veto, only twice this year so far...

I'm for Hillary, she will help big business and Wall St.

I am hoping no other Democrat comes close. Oh, I like how you used the word NAZI, that is a classic fear mongering trick.

Also, you might want to use spell check before you post, I don't want you to embarrass yourself.

 

[Ame®icano]

Foundation CEO admitted making mistakes. So, there is something there and I believe much more then we know.

It's not first time Clingons are having issues with donations and fundraisers, so it's clear they can't be trusted this time neither. For **** sake, if you really trust in her word that she can't handle two phones at the same time, you might trust her with these money laundering things, but can you really trust this **** holding a finger on a button? You lefties are so pathetic...

 

[Oldstyle]

Charity watchdog Clinton Foundation a slush fund New York Post


Well....is anyone surprised by anything the Clinton's do? According to the NY Post the Clinton Foundation took in $140 million in 2013. So what did the people get in direct aid from the $140 million?

Per tax records $9 million. That is a 6.4% return on money given.


Meanwhile, the Clinton Foundation has been placed on a charity watch for "problematic activities. Quote:

"Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years."
That

******* thieves.....pure ******* thieves....

Liar!

Please show us the lie.

Page 16: Program expenses: $196,633,380, Fundraising expenses $10,129,160, Salaries and benefits $16,633,562, Total $222,396,102. By my calculations, that's 88% of the money going to programing, which is a decent return.

The Clintons would have to be idiots to set up a charity as a personal slush fund given that everything they've ever done over the past 25 years has been scrutinized, studied, parsed and discussed, and they knew she would be running for office and this would come up.

There is no way she can legally set up her own PAC, so that part is a total lie. But it's not like this is the first time right wingers have lied about the Clintons.

Who can forget that the New York Times said that her use of private email was illegal and she could go to jail for it, and then they had to retract that statement because it was false. She broke no laws and was in no danger of going to jail.

I know you lot are desperate to get something, anything on Hillary to disqualify her candidacy but seriously people. check the facts. Google is your friend. If only you'd bother to use it.

It shows less than $55 million went to any charity, rest is salary, office expenditures, office equipment, property, travel and on and on which puts it less than 25%.

As far as the rest of your bullshit, I want Hillary as the Democratic nominee, her connections with Wall St. and big business, she will work with them as she owes them.

Sticking your head in the sand and saying I can't see it, just puts your ass in the air...

There is nothing here AGAIN....

The RW has been on a hard on for weeks trying to throw as much mud as possible... The didn't even wait to go dirty, they just continued on from Obama...

And rightly so the polls are showing that their endless lies are being found out... Their tactic of telling a lie and keep repeating it (a NAZI trick) is starting to wain...

Even the most casual infromed voter knows that the GOP and RW are just lieing and lieing...

The places that caught them are Trickle dow economics, Iraq and the economy crisis.... They are also delivering next to nothing, heck even Obama is rarely using the Veto, only twice this year so far...

So The Times lied? Is that what you're going with, Teddy? That "they" are part of the Nazi conspiracy against, Hillary? You know...the "vast right wing conspiracy" that Hillary tried to blame her husband's lies on back in the day? Care to take a crack at explaining how the Clinton Foundation somehow "forgot" to claim all those foreign donors on their income tax statements? Is that a "lie" too?