Clinton Camp Wants Fox News Presidential Debate Moderator Chris Wallace Removed

[Steve_McGarrett]

OK, replace Wallace with Michael Savage. How do you like them apples, Dems?

Hillary Clinton Ally: Drop Fox News Presidential Debate Moderator Chris Wallace Over Conflict of Interest

 

[Snouter]

Crooked Hillary got her ass beat so bad at the Commander in Chief thing they are desperate. Wallace is a long time Democrat and let Crooked Hillary lie during the interview with her a few weeks ago. The butthurtness of the Dems cannot be underestimated.

 

[S.J.]

She's afraid Chris will use the opportunity to get even with Bill for attacking him during his interview.

 

[MisterBeale]

David Brock is just worried Roger Ailes is going to coach Trump through an earpiece.

I guess he just doesn't want them to be on an equal footing.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

Trump people want Hillary to show up with no foreign objects in her ears/butt/pants

 

[bodecea]

OK, replace Wallace with Michael Savage. How do you like them apples, Dems?

Hillary Clinton Ally: Drop Fox News Presidential Debate Moderator Chris Wallace Over Conflict of Interest

Shouldn't happen...ain't gonna happen.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

next thing u know,,,,Hillary will demand a pee break every ten minutes

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's clearly a conflict of interest. Foxnews is all-in for Trump.

 

[bodecea]

It's clearly a conflict of interest. Foxnews is all-in for Trump.

So what...she'll still crush him.

 

[Hossfly]

I would gladly give a months pay to see and hear Judge Jeanine Pirro interview or moderate Hilliary. Hilliary would have to be removed in a strait jacket. Never happen though.

 

[MisterBeale]

It's clearly a conflict of interest. Foxnews is all-in for Trump.

What's your point?


By that logic, only folks from the alternative media that are not associated with the Aglo-American establishment are qualified to host the debates.

"NBC news chief anchor Lester Holt will moderate the first scheduled presidential debate on Sept. 26 between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.


ABC’s Martha Raddatz and CNN’s Anderson Cooper are doing the second and Fox News Channel’s Chris Wallace the third."
Here are the moderators of the 2016 presidential debates

NBC, ABC, and CNN are all in the tank for Clinton. In fact, Cooper is so Deep State, he received his training at the CIA.

Impartiality? Hell, every intelligent person so knows how that has already gone down. Get your head out of your ass.


Even Fox is a member of the CFR, so don't worry your pretty little head. Look what Megyn Kelly did to Trump. If the establishment had it's way, Hillary would be running against Bush, Cruz, or some other putz right now.

 

[Avatar4321]

And id like Clinton and trump removed. And in Clinton's case thrown in jail.

However if they are going to to get rid of Wallace have them put in Glenn beck. He will ask tough questions to both of them.

 

[JakeStarkey]

And id like Clinton and trump removed. And in Clinton's case thrown in jail.

However if they are going to to get rid of Wallace have them put in Glenn beck. He will ask tough questions to both of them.

Beck hates them both, so, yeah.

 

[MisterBeale]

If folks bitching on the right and on left really cared, they would demand that the control of the debates be given back to The League of Women Voters.

When they didn't, they signaled that they were ready for a sham democracy.

League Refuses to "Help Perpetrate a Fraud"
League Refuses to "Help Perpetrate a Fraud"
"It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and honest answers to tough questions," Neuman said. "The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."


Neuman said that the campaigns presented the League with their debate agreement on
September 28, two weeks before the scheduled debate. The campaigns' agreement was negotiated "behind closed doors" and vas presented to the League as "a done deal," she said, its 16 pages of conditions not subject to negotiation.


Most objectionable to the League, Neuman said, were conditions in the agreement that gave the campaigns unprecedented control over the proceedings. Neuman called "outrageous" the campaigns' demands that they control the selection of questioners, the composition of the audience, hall access for the press and other issues.


"The campaigns' agreement is a closed-door masterpiece," Neuman said. "Never in the history of the League of Women Voters have two candidates' organizations come to us with such stringent, unyielding and self-serving demands."


Neuman said she and the League regretted that the American people have had no real opportunities to judge the presidential nominees outside of campaign-controlled environments.


"On the threshold of a new millenium, this country remains the brightest hope for all who cherish free speech and open debate," Neuman said. "Americans deserve to see and hear the men who would be president face each other in a debate on the hard and complex issues critical to our progress into the next century."


The League of Women Voters and Candidate Debates: A Changing Relationship

 

[MarathonMike]

None of the moderators should be from the media IMO. They are all entertainers and all of them have abandoned their journalistic principles.

 

[ColonelAngus]

No one seemed to have an issue with the moderators of Hillary and Bernie's debate on PBS being Clinton donors.

OR the fact that Martha Raddatz had OBAMA at her wedding.

LET ME REPEAT:

Martha Raddatz had OBAMA at her wedding...I guess Trump should insist she be removed.

 

[IsaacNewton]

Faux News isn't a news channel, they admitted that early on. It is purely a right wing opinion channel, so any of their paid shills cannot, by definition, be unbiased. The fact that most of the regulars are jumping ship ought to be enough information on the state of the ship. Faux should be left out of adult politics in America. They are the JV team.

 

[MisterBeale]

And id like Clinton and trump removed. And in Clinton's case thrown in jail.

However if they are going to to get rid of Wallace have them put in Glenn beck. He will ask tough questions to both of them.

Beck hates them both, so, yeah.

Beck only pretends to hate Hillary. He has to maintain his street cred. He is still an establishment CFR guy.

 

[MisterBeale]

None of the moderators should be from the media IMO. They are all entertainers and all of them have abandoned their journalistic principles.

Absolutely. They ought to have other entertainers read the questions if they are going to choose entertainers.


The job is to ask questions, and keep time. Any pretty face can do it. My kid could do the job.


They just need to come up with someone that everyone trusts.


I did some research, I found that one of the most trusted "celebrities" turns out to be Judge Judy.

That's enough Ms. Clinton.

C'mon, wrap it up Donald, let's keep things moving.

 

[MarathonMike]

Judge Judy would be a big improvement. I was thinking you could choose one moderator from among teachers, one from business, and one from the military.