Clinton, and The Seeds of Obama's Destruction

[PoliticalChic]

A major point from the OP is the reason why Obama is fabricating the details of the attack.....
....it reveals that he has zero foreign policy successes!

None!

Well this is a lie.

Oh and this wont sink him. The economy is more important than some attack in another country.

You're far from being a quick learner, aren't you.

I never lie.

Ever.



He's already sunk.

 

[Plasmaball]

A major point from the OP is the reason why Obama is fabricating the details of the attack.....
....it reveals that he has zero foreign policy successes!

None!

Well this is a lie.

Oh and this wont sink him. The economy is more important than some attack in another country.

You're far from being a quick learner, aren't you.

I never lie.

Ever.



He's already sunk.

well


sure

you

lie.

Stating


you


never


lie


is

a


lie.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Well this is a lie.

Oh and this wont sink him. The economy is more important than some attack in another country.

You're far from being a quick learner, aren't you.

I never lie.

Ever.



He's already sunk.

well


sure

you

lie.

Stating


you


never


lie


is

a


lie.

Getting involved with you in this level of post is like starting a game of 'Peek-a-boo' with the three year old in the seat in front of you on the plane.

 

[Plasmaball]

so you hate kids? i bet you pinch other peoples kids because you dont like them.

Anyways thats how you post, annoying isn't it turd....?

 

[PoliticalChic]

so you hate kids? i bet you pinch other peoples kids because you dont like them.

Anyways thats how you post, annoying isn't it turd....?

My impression?

Your posts are representative of one who is jealous of the gifts others have, and you realize, you don't have.

Not imaginative, not smart, not educated.

Did I hit the nail on your head?




Help is available.....a compound based on the elements that you lack:

Thorium-Indium-Potassium.
I'm sure that you don't know the symbols....so very many things you don't know.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

A major point from the OP is the reason why Obama is fabricating the details of the attack.....
....it reveals that he has zero foreign policy successes!

None!

Well this is a lie.

Oh and this wont sink him. The economy is more important than some attack in another country.

Agreed.. exactly why 43+ months of record unemployment, record debt, record deficits, record numbers on public assistance, shrinking US $, credit downgrades, etc. will be his undoing.

 

[Plasmaball]

jealous lol...thats the meth talking.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

jealous lol...thats the meth talking.

Meth is bad for you... you should stop doing meth.

 

[PoliticalChic]

jealous lol...thats the meth talking.

So.....you're not ready to deny the conjecture?

 

[lukelk]

Benghazi won't sink Obama any more than Beirut sank Reagan...

...despite the latter being 50 times the tragedy, in lives lost.

Except that Reagan was driving policy that promoted a thriving economy, freedom, and national security, while Obama is driving policy that is collpasing our economy, stripping us of freedoms, and weakening our national security.

Obama was already going to lose in a landslide anyway (just like November 2010). This scandal is just the icing on the cake.

lol at this guy, WTF are you talking about with this regan nonsense. He did promote a thriving econ. infact his policy pretty much invented deficit spending, putting things on a cc, a bloated military and private job loss and public job gain growing the gov.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Benghazi won't sink Obama any more than Beirut sank Reagan...

...despite the latter being 50 times the tragedy, in lives lost.

Except that Reagan was driving policy that promoted a thriving economy, freedom, and national security, while Obama is driving policy that is collpasing our economy, stripping us of freedoms, and weakening our national security.

Obama was already going to lose in a landslide anyway (just like November 2010). This scandal is just the icing on the cake.

lol at this guy, WTF are you talking about with this regan nonsense. He did promote a thriving econ. infact his policy pretty much invented deficit spending, putting things on a cc, a bloated military and private job loss and public job gain growing the gov.

1. Cuts in tax rates to restore incentives for growth, first a reduction in the top rate from 70% to 50%, followed by a 25% across-the-board cut in rates for everyone. The 1986 tax reform, finally, left just two rates, 28% and 15%.

2. When Reagan came into office in 1981, he forced through Congress not only his famed, historic tax cuts, but also a package of budget cuts. That package was close to 5%, (a $31 billion cut) of the Federal budget at the time, which would be the equivalent of roughly $200 billion today.

In nominal terms, non-defense discretionary spending actually declined by 7.1% from 1981 to 1982. But the roaring inflation at the time actually masks the true magnitude of the Reagan spending cut achievement.

In constant dollars, non-defense discretionary spending declined by 14.4% from 1981 to 1982, and by 16.8% from 1981 to 1983. Moreover, in constant dollars, this non-defense discretionary spending never returned to its 1981 level for the rest of Reagan's two terms!

By 1988, this spending was still down 14.4% from its 1981 level in constant dollars. Even with the Reagan defense build-up, which, remember, won the Cold War without firing a shot, total Federal spending as a percent of GDP declined from a high of 23.5% of GDP in 1983 to 21.3% in 1988 and 21.2% in 1989. That's a real reduction in the size of government relative to the economy of 10%. Americansolutions.com


3. Anti-inflation monetary policy restraining money supply growth compared to demand, to maintain a stable value of the dollar.

4. Deregulation, which saved consumers an estimated $100 billion a year in lower prices. Reagan’s first executive order, in fact, eliminated price controls on oil and natural gas. Production soared, and the price of oil declined by over 50%.


5. His policies worked spectacularly! The Reagan recovery started officially in November of 1982 and lasted 92 months without any more than a shallow, short recession, until July 1990, when tax increases of the ’92 budget deal killed it.
Robert Bartley, “The Seven Fat Years,” p. 135, 144.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Benghazi won't sink Obama any more than Beirut sank Reagan...

...despite the latter being 50 times the tragedy, in lives lost.

"In the days before the attack, Joe Biden had been peddling his Obama campaign slogan that: "Bin Laden is dead, and General Motors is alive." The first successful terrorist attack on U.S. sovereign territory since 9/11, and on the very anniversary and by al-Qaida-linked killers, was not helpful to the Obama team. And so the nature of the event had to be "politicized": Look, over there – an Islamophobic movie! "Greater love hath no man than this," quoth the President at Chris Stevens' coffin, "that a man lay down his life for his friends." Smaller love hath no man than Obama's, than to lay down his "friend" for a couple of points in Ohio."
Mark Steyn: 'Politicized' Benghazi distracts from Big Bird | obama, four, security - Opinion - The Orange County Register

 

[Liberal]

He's already sunk.

Are you insinuating that he will lose the election?

 

[Liberal]

Except that Reagan was driving policy that promoted a thriving economy, freedom, and national security, while Obama is driving policy that is collpasing our economy, stripping us of freedoms, and weakening our national security.

Obama was already going to lose in a landslide anyway (just like November 2010). This scandal is just the icing on the cake.

lol at this guy, WTF are you talking about with this regan nonsense. He did promote a thriving econ. infact his policy pretty much invented deficit spending, putting things on a cc, a bloated military and private job loss and public job gain growing the gov.

1. Cuts in tax rates to restore incentives for growth, first a reduction in the top rate from 70% to 50%, followed by a 25% across-the-board cut in rates for everyone. The 1986 tax reform, finally, left just two rates, 28% and 15%.

2. When Reagan came into office in 1981, he forced through Congress not only his famed, historic tax cuts, but also a package of budget cuts. That package was close to 5%, (a $31 billion cut) of the Federal budget at the time, which would be the equivalent of roughly $200 billion today.

In nominal terms, non-defense discretionary spending actually declined by 7.1% from 1981 to 1982. But the roaring inflation at the time actually masks the true magnitude of the Reagan spending cut achievement.

In constant dollars, non-defense discretionary spending declined by 14.4% from 1981 to 1982, and by 16.8% from 1981 to 1983. Moreover, in constant dollars, this non-defense discretionary spending never returned to its 1981 level for the rest of Reagan's two terms!

By 1988, this spending was still down 14.4% from its 1981 level in constant dollars. Even with the Reagan defense build-up, which, remember, won the Cold War without firing a shot, total Federal spending as a percent of GDP declined from a high of 23.5% of GDP in 1983 to 21.3% in 1988 and 21.2% in 1989. That's a real reduction in the size of government relative to the economy of 10%. Americansolutions.com


3. Anti-inflation monetary policy restraining money supply growth compared to demand, to maintain a stable value of the dollar.

4. Deregulation, which saved consumers an estimated $100 billion a year in lower prices. Reagan’s first executive order, in fact, eliminated price controls on oil and natural gas. Production soared, and the price of oil declined by over 50%.


5. His policies worked spectacularly! The Reagan recovery started officially in November of 1982 and lasted 92 months without any more than a shallow, short recession, until July 1990, when tax increases of the ’92 budget deal killed it.
Robert Bartley, “The Seven Fat Years,” p. 135, 144.

Stop.

Seriously, stop regurgitating Peter Ferrara talking points.

I can't believe people think you are a "great poster" on this forum.. You can't even articulate your own opinion without copy/pasting replies.

 

[PoliticalChic]

lol at this guy, WTF are you talking about with this regan nonsense. He did promote a thriving econ. infact his policy pretty much invented deficit spending, putting things on a cc, a bloated military and private job loss and public job gain growing the gov.

1. Cuts in tax rates to restore incentives for growth, first a reduction in the top rate from 70% to 50%, followed by a 25% across-the-board cut in rates for everyone. The 1986 tax reform, finally, left just two rates, 28% and 15%.

2. When Reagan came into office in 1981, he forced through Congress not only his famed, historic tax cuts, but also a package of budget cuts. That package was close to 5%, (a $31 billion cut) of the Federal budget at the time, which would be the equivalent of roughly $200 billion today.

In nominal terms, non-defense discretionary spending actually declined by 7.1% from 1981 to 1982. But the roaring inflation at the time actually masks the true magnitude of the Reagan spending cut achievement.

In constant dollars, non-defense discretionary spending declined by 14.4% from 1981 to 1982, and by 16.8% from 1981 to 1983. Moreover, in constant dollars, this non-defense discretionary spending never returned to its 1981 level for the rest of Reagan's two terms!

By 1988, this spending was still down 14.4% from its 1981 level in constant dollars. Even with the Reagan defense build-up, which, remember, won the Cold War without firing a shot, total Federal spending as a percent of GDP declined from a high of 23.5% of GDP in 1983 to 21.3% in 1988 and 21.2% in 1989. That's a real reduction in the size of government relative to the economy of 10%. Americansolutions.com


3. Anti-inflation monetary policy restraining money supply growth compared to demand, to maintain a stable value of the dollar.

4. Deregulation, which saved consumers an estimated $100 billion a year in lower prices. Reagan’s first executive order, in fact, eliminated price controls on oil and natural gas. Production soared, and the price of oil declined by over 50%.


5. His policies worked spectacularly! The Reagan recovery started officially in November of 1982 and lasted 92 months without any more than a shallow, short recession, until July 1990, when tax increases of the ’92 budget deal killed it.
Robert Bartley, “The Seven Fat Years,” p. 135, 144.

Stop.

Seriously, stop regurgitating Peter Ferrara talking points.

I can't believe people think you are a "great poster" on this forum.. You can't even articulate your own opinion without copy/pasting replies.

Inadvertent compliments are always the best.

You've served your purpose, now don't let me keep you, Lumbricus.

 

[Plasmaball]

jealous lol...thats the meth talking.

Meth is bad for you... you should stop doing meth.

thankfully i don't take meth, the OP on the otherhand seems to pound it.

 

[Plasmaball]

jealous lol...thats the meth talking.

So.....you're not ready to deny the conjecture?

you a silly little girl...