Climate Skeptics on ‘historic’ UN treaty: ‘Does this mean we never have to hear about ‘solving’ glob

[Freewill]

Climate Skeptics on ‘historic’ UN treaty: ‘Does this mean we never have to hear about ‘solving’ global warming again!?’

Climate Depot's Marc Morano: 'Now that the United Nations has officially 'solved' man-made global warming, does this mean we never have to hear about 'global warming' fears again!? Does this mean we can halt the endless supply of federal tax dollars funding 'climate change' studies? Does this mean we can stop worrying about 'global warming's' ability to end civilization and cause wars, and increase prostitution, bar room brawls, rape, airline turbulence, etc.? Can we finally move on to other issues? I spent the last week in Paris marveling at how so many believe a form of modern witchcraft: That a UN agreement or EPA climate regulations can alter Earth's temperature and the level of storms. But now I realize that if they truly believe the UN has solved 'climate change' even skeptics should rejoice! Now that the UN treaty has 'solved' global warming, can we all just move on to something else?'



Read more: Climate Skeptics on 'historic' UN treaty: 'Does this mean we never have to hear about 'solving' global warming again!?'

 

[mamooth]

I hope it means we never have to hear weepy denier nonsense like Morano's again. Maybe they'll finally get the message that the whole planet considers them to be cranks, liars and losers, and slink away in disgrace, never to be heard from again.

Sadly, that won't happen. The denier cutlists have grown dependent on the emotional gratification they get from crying at people, and their leaders depend on the votes and cash they get from manipulating the rubes.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Good!

Now we can defund all this crap and put the monies to better use... Time to move on from this fraud..

 

[Old Rocks]

What this means is that we now get serious about actually addressing this issue. We already have an antiquated grid, so now is the time to replace it with it with a new one, a distributed grid. And throw that grid across the many places in the West that have vast potential for solar, wind, and geothermal. And the rest of the world will follow.

 

[ScienceRocks]

What this means is that we now get serious about actually addressing this issue. We already have an antiquated grid, so now is the time to replace it with it with a new one, a distributed grid. And throw that grid across the many places in the West that have vast potential for solar, wind, and geothermal. And the rest of the world will follow.

Good idea! A few hundred thousands gw of solar, wind and wave energy. Also, more money for fusion research and a doubling of our nuclear resources. Both would help to stabilize the grid.

That is my idea of action.

 

[Sunni Man]

 

[MarathonMike]

The biggest polluters, India and China are going to do what exactly? And when? And how will their actions, if they take any, be verified?

 

[Freewill]

What this means is that we now get serious about actually addressing this issue. We already have an antiquated grid, so now is the time to replace it with it with a new one, a distributed grid. And throw that grid across the many places in the West that have vast potential for solar, wind, and geothermal. And the rest of the world will follow.

What the hell does the grid have to do with GHGs? See that is where you expose the real agenda of the fear mongers.

 

[Freewill]

The biggest polluters, India and China are going to do what exactly? And when? And how will their actions, if they take any, be verified?

They are going to make sure the US cuts emissions even more, by shutting down US industry.

 

[Freewill]

I hope it means we never have to hear weepy denier nonsense like Morano's again. Maybe they'll finally get the message that the whole planet considers them to be cranks, liars and losers, and slink away in disgrace, never to be heard from again.

Sadly, that won't happen. The denier cutlists have grown dependent on the emotional gratification they get from crying at people, and their leaders depend on the votes and cash they get from manipulating the rubes.

Apparently we won't move on, the fear mongers are not done whining.

 

[Mr. H.]

At this "summit", did Obama announce to the world that our country's emissions are at a 20 year low?

Greens: US on track for 20-year low in carbon emissions

Did Obama also announce that this phenomenon was brought about by the increased use of natural gas?

Leveraging Natural Gas to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions | Center for Climate and Energy Solutions

And did Obama credit this increased use of natural gas to high volume high pressure hydraulic fracturing?

Fracking puts U.S. first in shale gas production

Of course he did none of the above.

Fuck that semi-Negro socialist communist Muslim Kenyan homosexual.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Climate Skeptics on ‘historic’ UN treaty: ‘Does this mean we never have to hear about ‘solving’ global warming again!?’

Climate Depot's Marc Morano: 'Now that the United Nations has officially 'solved' man-made global warming, does this mean we never have to hear about 'global warming' fears again!? Does this mean we can halt the endless supply of federal tax dollars funding 'climate change' studies? Does this mean we can stop worrying about 'global warming's' ability to end civilization and cause wars, and increase prostitution, bar room brawls, rape, airline turbulence, etc.? Can we finally move on to other issues? I spent the last week in Paris marveling at how so many believe a form of modern witchcraft: That a UN agreement or EPA climate regulations can alter Earth's temperature and the level of storms. But now I realize that if they truly believe the UN has solved 'climate change' even skeptics should rejoice! Now that the UN treaty has 'solved' global warming, can we all just move on to something else?'



Read more: Climate Skeptics on 'historic' UN treaty: 'Does this mean we never have to hear about 'solving' global warming again!?'

Obama said the oceans began to recede when he was sworn in Jan 08. His hysteria only grew from there.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Nations Approve Landmark Climate Accord in Paris

LE BOURGET, France - With the sudden bang of a gavel Saturday night, representatives of 195 nations reached a landmark accord that will, for the first time, commit nearly every country to lowering planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions to help stave ...

 

[mamooth]

This is just a start, of course. Some scientists, such as Hansen, are correctly pointing out it doesn't go nearly far enough and needs more teeth for enforcement. But that's a half-empty kind of view. The fact that 195 nations unanimously agreed to what they did was amazing. Only 6 years ago at Copenhagen, they couldn't agree to anything.

The enforcement is currently left up to individual nations. And that means we are responsible for seeing it through. Many conservatives will try to sabotage it. So we still have to work, constantly and tirelessly, at not letting them do it.

The agreement isn't enough. It talks about limits to 1.5C, but that's already locked in (we're already close to +1.0C). +2.0C isn't even doable under the agreement. The current agreement would have the world ending up more like at +2.7C, which is pretty awful. Targets need to be revised downwards.

So, to answer the OP -- no, the rational and ethical people aren't going to stop pushing, as so much more work is necessary. On a local level, that means humiliating denier kooks and diminishing their political power.

 

[skookerasbil]

Nations Approve Landmark Climate Accord in Paris

LE BOURGET, France - With the sudden bang of a gavel Saturday night, representatives of 195 nations reached a landmark accord that will, for the first time, commit nearly every country to lowering planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions to help stave ...

non-binding s0n............legally holds as much sway as a small soap dish on a 50 year old toilet. DOA in the US because progressives got their clocks cleaned in 2014!!

Idiots still talking about science on here are beyond clueless.......its ALL about the politics s0n and the politics suck-ass if you are an AGW progressive in 2015!!

 

[skookerasbil]

Why the Paris climate treaty will be the flop of the year



But go right ahead and take all the bows you want s0ns!!!

 

[Freewill]

This is just a start, of course. Some scientists, such as Hansen, are correctly pointing out it doesn't go nearly far enough and needs more teeth for enforcement. But that's a half-empty kind of view. The fact that 195 nations unanimously agreed to what they did was amazing. Only 6 years ago at Copenhagen, they couldn't agree to anything.

The enforcement is currently left up to individual nations. And that means we are responsible for seeing it through. Many conservatives will try to sabotage it. So we still have to work, constantly and tirelessly, at not letting them do it.

The agreement isn't enough. It talks about limits to 1.5C, but that's already locked in (we're already close to +1.0C). +2.0C isn't even doable under the agreement. The current agreement would have the world ending up more like at +2.7C, which is pretty awful. Targets need to be revised downwards.

So, to answer the OP -- no, the rational and ethical people aren't going to stop pushing, as so much more work is necessary. On a local level, that means humiliating denier kooks and diminishing their political power.

OK, then, the pact didn't do shit. Gottja. More cramming of the warmist agenda to be expected.

 

[mamooth]

It was one major battle won. The war continues. The denier army is in retreat, and we're pursuing.

 

[Freewill]

It was one major battle won. The war continues. The denier army is in retreat, and we're pursuing.

And hyperbole is your weapon, apparently.

 

[MarathonMike]

Who on this board knows exactly how this global agreement is going to be implemented and monitored? Does each country that's part of the agreement collect it's own taxes? How are the taxes levied? Is there some Global entity that oversees each country's emissions? What happens when they don't comply?