Climate scientist: Yes, I cooked my Nature article on global warming — and here’s why.

[Weatherman2020]

I have a friend who’s one of the leading researchers in black holes. She says the biggest problem with her field is fighting the narrative to obtain funding. Nothing to do with political outcomes in her field, but so much of science is guided by having a predetermined outcome that fits the narrative.

Climate change is a gravy train for a lot of people who just enjoy spinning a narrative just to get wealthy.

This researcher no longer works in academia so felt free to discuss this.

“Feeding the narrative? Check. Editorial bias? Check.Top-down political influence on science? Double check. Bloated Academia competing too hard for too few dollars and openings? Check, at least to a degree. Ironically, that makes the Academia-Media nexus the least interesting part of Brown’s essay, but it’s still plenty interesting — and important, too.”

I Left Out the Full Truth to Get My Climate Change Paper Published

I just got published in Nature because I stuck to a narrative I knew the editors would like. That’s not the way science should work.

www.thefp.com

Climate scientist: Yes, I cooked my Nature article on global warming -- and here's why

hotair.com

 

[EMH]

All FRAUD.

The only thing the Co2 FRAUD has that is real is Urban Heat Sink Effect. Otherwise, for the duration of the Co2 FRAUD, the climate data has read precisely


NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in CANES
NO OCEAN RISE

 

[EMH]

View attachment 825484

I have a friend who’s one of the leading researchers in black holes. She says the biggest problem with her field is fighting the narrative to obtain funding. Nothing to do with political outcomes in her field, but so much of science is guided by having a predetermined outcome that fits the narrative.

Climate change is a gravy train for a lot of people who just enjoy spinning a narrative just to get wealthy.

This researcher no longer works in academia so felt free to discuss this.

“Feeding the narrative? Check. Editorial bias? Check.Top-down political influence on science? Double check. Bloated Academia competing too hard for too few dollars and openings? Check, at least to a degree. Ironically, that makes the Academia-Media nexus the least interesting part of Brown’s essay, but it’s still plenty interesting — and important, too.”

I Left Out the Full Truth to Get My Climate Change Paper Published

I just got published in Nature because I stuck to a narrative I knew the editors would like. That’s not the way science should work.

www.thefp.com

Climate scientist: Yes, I cooked my Nature article on global warming -- and here's why

hotair.com

This individual failed to notice that too many humans are sucking too much fresh water from nature, causing vegetation to dry and become ready to burn. Wet plants do not burn. How hard is that to understand?

 

[expat_panama]

View attachment 825484

I have a friend who’s one of the leading researchers in black holes. She says the biggest problem with her field is fighting the narrative to obtain funding. Nothing to do with political outcomes in her field, but so much of science is guided by having a predetermined outcome that fits the narrative.

Climate change is a gravy train for a lot of people who just enjoy spinning a narrative just to get wealthy.

This researcher no longer works in academia so felt free to discuss this.

“Feeding the narrative? Check. Editorial bias? Check.Top-down political influence on science? Double check. Bloated Academia competing too hard for too few dollars and openings? Check, at least to a degree. Ironically, that makes the Academia-Media nexus the least interesting part of Brown’s essay, but it’s still plenty interesting — and important, too.”

I Left Out the Full Truth to Get My Climate Change Paper Published

I just got published in Nature because I stuck to a narrative I knew the editors would like. That’s not the way science should work.

www.thefp.com

Climate scientist: Yes, I cooked my Nature article on global warming -- and here's why

hotair.com

Another bias that comes out w/ publishing science papers is the fact that it's a lot easier to publish findings of some new correlation (say, proving coffee makes your hair fall out) but it's a lot harder to publish data that debunks earlier false correlations.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Urban Heat Sink Effect

Heat Island

Is it Alzheimer's?

 

[skye]

All FRAUD.

The only thing the Co2 FRAUD has that is real is Urban Heat Sink Effect. Otherwise, for the duration of the Co2 FRAUD, the climate data has read precisely


NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in CANES
NO OCEAN RISE

 

[Weatherman2020]

When you hear ‘climate’, just follow the money.

 

[EMH]

View attachment 825738

The Maui mass murder used more sophisticated weapons than flamethrowers, but the data is perfectly clear. The damage in the photos we see of Maui was not caused by a "wildfire." Not even close...

 

[EMH]

Heat Island

Is it Alzheimer's?

Was Antarctica still on the south pole 70 million years ago?

Still parroting McBullshit "studies" that date wood outside as 20k years old??

LOL!!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Was Antarctica still on the south pole 70 million years ago?

Still parroting McBullshit "studies" that date wood outside as 20k years old??

LOL!!!

Still looking for the info the Jews are hiding from you?

 

[EMH]

Still looking for the info the Jews are hiding from you?

Stick to the debate short cock....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Stick to the debate short cock....

Keep drooling, retard.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Was Antarctica still on the south pole 70 million years ago?

Still parroting McBullshit "studies" that date wood outside as 20k years old??

LOL!!!

Yes, Antarctica was at the South Pole 70 million years ago.
In fact, over 100 million years ago.

“From about 100 myr ago (later Cretaceous) the crust of Australia and New Zealand begin separating from Antarctica. By this time Antarctica is already positioned over the South Pole.”

Science.

Tectonic history: into the deep freeze - Discovering Antarctica

Antarctica hasn’t always been a continent covered in thick ice. Find out how and why the landscape has changed over the past 200 million years.

discoveringantarctica.org.uk

 

[EMH]

Yes, Antarctica was at the South Pole 70 million years ago.
In fact, over 100 million years ago.

“From about 100 myr ago (later Cretaceous) the crust of Australia and New Zealand begin separating from Antarctica. By this time Antarctica is already positioned over the South Pole.”

Science.

Tectonic history: into the deep freeze - Discovering Antarctica

Antarctica hasn’t always been a continent covered in thick ice. Find out how and why the landscape has changed over the past 200 million years.

discoveringantarctica.org.uk

FRAUD....

Read the OP from this one...

The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago

McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure... We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Weatherman2020]

FRAUD....

Read the OP from this one...

The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago

McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure... We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old...

www.usmessageboard.com

I supplied links to scientists.
You have zero links.

I win again.

 

[EMH]

Yes, Antarctica was at the South Pole 70 million years ago.
In fact, over 100 million years ago.

“From about 100 myr ago (later Cretaceous) the crust of Australia and New Zealand begin separating from Antarctica. By this time Antarctica is already positioned over the South Pole.”

Science.

Tectonic history: into the deep freeze - Discovering Antarctica

Antarctica hasn’t always been a continent covered in thick ice. Find out how and why the landscape has changed over the past 200 million years.

discoveringantarctica.org.uk

One of the biggest problems in outing the Co2 fraud is that there are always idiots like you who parrot things that are fudge and accept them as true, when, in fact, they are easily refuted.

The other pole's McBullshit is also laughably destroyed here...

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[EMH]

I supplied links to scientists.
You have zero links.

I win again.

A link to fudged fraud is all it takes... great polly....

You can always tell an idiot, they are the ones who parrot once and cannot debate...

 

[EMH]

The vicious circle of the idiot parrot.

Everyone is a parrot, because the parrot is a parrot. So you are PARROTING....

until we discover NOBODY ELSE IS SAYING THE SAME THINGS....

and then you are "wrong" because said PARROT can link a fudged fraud chart to "prove" you are "wrong."

the ATMOSPHERE is WARMING and I can cite hundreds of fudge charts to "prove" it...

Never mind we have TWO AND ONLY TWO readings of atmospheric temps, and during a period of rising Co2....

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"



So a fudged fraud chart that shows "atmospheric warming" clearly "proves" the actual data was "wrong" because a conflicted taxpayer funded liar fudged it, and a parrot can link it and cut paste copy it...

LOL!!!

 

[Flash]

View attachment 825484

I have a friend who’s one of the leading researchers in black holes. She says the biggest problem with her field is fighting the narrative to obtain funding. Nothing to do with political outcomes in her field, but so much of science is guided by having a predetermined outcome that fits the narrative.

Climate change is a gravy train for a lot of people who just enjoy spinning a narrative just to get wealthy.

This researcher no longer works in academia so felt free to discuss this.

“Feeding the narrative? Check. Editorial bias? Check.Top-down political influence on science? Double check. Bloated Academia competing too hard for too few dollars and openings? Check, at least to a degree. Ironically, that makes the Academia-Media nexus the least interesting part of Brown’s essay, but it’s still plenty interesting — and important, too.”

I Left Out the Full Truth to Get My Climate Change Paper Published

I just got published in Nature because I stuck to a narrative I knew the editors would like. That’s not the way science should work.

www.thefp.com

Climate scientist: Yes, I cooked my Nature article on global warming -- and here's why

hotair.com

Just another of the many examples of the Environmental Wackos lying about AGW.

Hardly news worthy any more seeing how frequent we see it.

 

[Flash]

Scientists can be bought just like politicians.