Anomalies are not "adjusted", they are calculated.
Is Sabine the woman in the picture? What do you actually mean by "booted from the Global Warming Club"? Was anything actually done to her by anyone?
Just as an FYI, the authors of this paper are a who's who of global warming deniers.Scientists come to opposite conclusions about the causes of recent climate change depending on which datasets they consider. For instance, the panels on the left lead to the conclusion that global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to human-caused emissions, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), i.e., the conclusion reached by the UN IPCC reports. In contrast, the panels on the right lead to the exact opposite conclusion, i.e., that the global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to natural cycles, chiefly long-term changes in the energy emitted by the Sun.
Both sets of panels are based on published scientific data, but each uses different datasets and assumptions. On the left, it is assumed that the available temperature records are unaffected by the urban heat island problem, and so all stations are used, whether urban or rural. On the right, only rural stations are used. Meanwhile, on the left, solar output is modeled using the low variability dataset that has been chosen for the IPCC’s upcoming (in 2021/2022) 6th Assessment Reports. This implies zero contribution from natural factors to the long-term warming. On the right, solar output is modeled using a high variability dataset used by the team in charge of NASA’s ACRIM sun-monitoring satellites. This implies that most, if not all, of the long-term temperature changes are due to natural factors.
Here is the link to the full paper.
ShieldSquare Captcha
I have long wondered why people like you are so fanatical to believe the AGW religionist group and so resistant to looking at any scientific study/thought/analysis that is contrary to the AGW religion?
fyi Ever notice how scientists who test Relativity or any other Theory in the Universe apart from “American CO2 is killing all life on Earth” are not “Deniers”
I didn't say "deniers". I said "global warming deniers".
No. They are deniers of AGW. So what? So am I.
One segment of satellilte and one segment of radiosonde data that did not match other data at the time and were found to both be suffering calibration issues. Data before, during and after their collection showed warming.
You always use the term "break out". Let's try a more quantifiable term: INCREASE
www.c2es.org
As several people have already told you, surface pressure drops with increasing temperature.
'You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.' --Daniel Patrick Moynihan
