Climate Hustle do not miss this film

[Rambunctious]

Do not miss this film...it explains everything.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Paying people to say "CONSENSUS!!!" is not science

 

[Rambunctious]

Paying people to say "CONSENSUS!!!" is not science

So if you get paid you're a liar? does that include the paid lackeys/scientist that agree with man made global warming?

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[ClosedCaption]

Paying people to say "CONSENSUS!!!" is not science

Of course it isnt...but science is science

 

[mamooth]

As we hate to see the mentally handicapped taken advantage of, we at least attempt to keep deniers from sending any money to the various fraudsters who run their cult. But if they're dead set on funding shysters like Morano, we can't stop them.

 

[jc456]

Paying people to say "CONSENSUS!!!" is not science

Of course it isnt...but science is science

damn, and here I thought science was football.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Paying people to say "CONSENSUS!!!" is not science

Of course it isnt...but science is science

damn, and here I thought science was football.

And that guy thought consensus was science so theres a lot of that going around

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Paying people to say "CONSENSUS!!!" is not science

Of course it isnt...but science is science

yeah.

Can you point to even one single lab experiment linking 200PPM of CO2 to any discernible increase in temperature?

No?

Didn't think so

 

[ClosedCaption]

Why only 200PPM of CO2?

 

[jc456]

Why only 200PPM of CO2?

I agree, what about 10PPM or 20 or 400 or whatever, where is the experiment?

 

[skookerasbil]

A huge plurality of the population doesn't care about global warming. Those that do and who are not part of the religion, have not been exposed to the facts presented in the film.....the zombies with their heads in the iStoopidphone 24 hours a day......

No need to elaborate

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Why only 200PPM of CO2?

Are you at all familiar with your age theory

 

[SSDD]

Why only 200PPM of CO2?

Because we have seen about a 60 parts per million rise since 1981...and you guys claim that it is wrecking the atmosphere...funny considering that you can't provide any evidence showing that even 200 ppm will cause an increase....there is a vast disconnect between what you claim that CO2 can do and what you are actually able to demonstrate that it can do.

 

[ClosedCaption]

There is also a difference between your speculation and scientific theory.

You think just because you can think up a question then that in itself proves something.

We'll it does actually. It proves you can come up with questions. But you cant come up with answers.

 

[SSDD]

There is also a difference between your speculation and scientific theory.

You think just because you can think up a question then that in itself proves something.

We'll it does actually. It proves you can come up with questions. But you cant come up with answers.

Science is about asking questions, then researching till you can get answers...thus far, climate science has provided absolutely zero actual observed, measured, quantified evidence to support the A in AGW...sure, the climate is changing....it has always changed but there is absolutely no real world evidence that man is altering the global climate. If CO2 had the power you guys claim, it should be no problem to come up with a valid lab experiment to demonstrate it....us skeptics keep asking and you warmers keep not delivering.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Except the only issue here is getting you to believe it. Science is there fto present facts. You call the facts something other than facts and demand.....FACTS! Lol...it's a cute little game where you demand something until it's given then you dismiss those findings as if your dismissal means the facts never happened.

So at the end of the day what you're saying is that CO2 has no effect on anything. LOL...that's funny

 

[SSDD]

Except the only issue here is getting you to believe it. Science is there fto present facts. You call the facts something other than facts and demand.....FACTS! Lol...it's a cute little game where you demand something until it's given then you dismiss those findings as if your dismissal means the facts never happened.

So at the end of the day what you're saying is that CO2 has no effect on anything. LOL...that's funny

Wake up...I started a whole thread asking for nothing more than to be deluged with the observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence gathered from out here in the real observable, measurable, quantifiable world that supports the A in AGW.... and thus far, not one bit of actual evidence in support of that all important A has been posted...certainly observed, measured evidence of some things...but not the A in AGW....you believe evidence exists...there is a whole thread whose sole purpose is for you to slap me down and make me your bitch with it...you got evidence go to the thread titled "In support of the A in AGW" and give it your best shot...

I predict, however, that you won't show and if you do, you won't have anything like actual observed, measured, quantified evidence in support of the A in AGW...

And sure, CO2 has an effect on things....it makes plants grow great...It can put out an electrical fire or chemical fire safely...it even serves a purpose in your body...but altering the global climate?...not a chance in hell.

 

[mamooth]

Wake up...I started a whole thread asking for nothing more than to be deluged with the observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence gathered from out here in the real observable, measurable, quantifiable world that supports the A in AGW....

And you were given it, in spades, and in response you went into a meltdown of denial. It's why you're called a denier. And why that thread is now only useful as an illustration of the personality disorders displayed by hard core cultists.

Oh, once more, here's the link to the hundreds of lab experiments documenting the IR spectral absorption properties of all atmospheric gases, put together by those pinkos at the Air Force. Deniers will scream "That doesn't count!" because ... because ... well, they don't say. They just sulk about how the last century of physics is a conspiracy. It's the same "Because I say so!" standard they use in every aspect of their "science".

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/hitran/Updated/ref-table.pdf

Anyways, you deniers all make sure you throw some money at self-admitted paid propagandist Morano. The cult wants you to, and that's all the motivation you should need.

 

[elektra]

Wake up...I started a whole thread asking for nothing more than to be deluged with the observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence gathered from out here in the real observable, measurable, quantifiable world that supports the A in AGW....

And you were given it, in spades, and in response you went into a meltdown of denial. It's why you're called a denier. And why that thread is now only useful as an illustration of the personality disorders displayed by hard core cultists.

Oh, once more, here's the link to the hundreds of lab experiments documenting the IR spectral absorption properties of all atmospheric gases, put together by those pinkos at the Air Force. Deniers will scream "That doesn't count!" because ... because ... well, they don't say. They just sulk about how the last century of physics is a conspiracy. It's the same "Because I say so!" standard they use in every aspect of their "science".

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/hitran/Updated/ref-table.pdf

Anyways, you deniers all make sure you throw some money at self-admitted paid propagandist Morano. The cult wants you to, and that's all the motivation you should need.

There is not one study in that whole database that shows CO2 increases the temperature of the earth. Not one. Point one out, link and quote, otherwise your link is another MOOT point.