Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How can one be sincerely concerned about man-made Climate Change but opposed to the most obvious remedy, nuclear power? Please explain.
How can one be sincerely concerned about man-made Climate Change but opposed to the most obvious remedy, nuclear power? Please explain.
How can one be sincerely concerned about man-made Climate Change but opposed to the most obvious remedy, nuclear power? Please explain.
Don't expect logic from Greens.
Cheapest power is not coming from a monopoly.It may be more about our corrupt government running a lucrative protection racket for the old big energy corporations.
Agreed. Monopoly has nothing to do with my postCheapest power is not coming from a monopoly.It may be more about our corrupt government running a lucrative protection racket for the old big energy corporations.
Which outweigh climate change then?The reasons right or wrong cost, safety, & a extreme long time line to build one.
The key word here is "sincerely". The Left is NOT sincerely concerned with the planet, they are concerned only with power over the people and their personal wealth.How can one be sincerely concerned about man-made Climate Change but opposed to the most obvious remedy, nuclear power? Please explain.
The reasons right or wrong cost, safety, & a extreme long time line to build one.
It's not as big of a deal as you think it isI'm not a climate wacko, but have they ever figured out what do do with nuclear waste? Isn't that stuff still very real bad news? I say stick to clean coal if possible.
How can one be sincerely concerned about man-made Climate Change but opposed to the most obvious remedy, nuclear power? Please explain.
How can one be sincerely concerned about man-made Climate Change but opposed to the most obvious remedy, nuclear power? Please explain.
Depends on what else you believe in. Nuclear waste is an issue, radiation dangers etc. To believe in man-made climate change and ignore the nuclear option really would require that you also support drawdown strategies intended to fundamentally shift how humans live their lives. I have yet to encounter a mainstream democrat who supports radical reductions in consumption, including energy consumption. They have a techno optimism that if you throw money at it, people will magically invent new technologies out of thin air while they ignore that most of the low hanging fruit has been picked already in terms of technology. I do support such draw down strategies, but I don't particularly care about nuclear energy nor is it because of AGW (about which I am skeptical). It is because 1) it reduces pollution and degradation of natural habits; 2) it reduces people's dependence on others for absolutely all aspects of their lives; and 3) People will be a lot less crazy and stressed out all the time chasing dollars to buy whatever they are indoctrinated to believe they must have next.
How can one be sincerely concerned about man-made Climate Change but opposed to the most obvious remedy, nuclear power? Please explain.